• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Conder101

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    10,047
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    90

Posts posted by Conder101

  1. Actually the second one is the one with the damage.  When this farthing design came out in 1895 and 1896 some scammers were managing to pass off the unfamiliar coins as 1/2 sovereigns. (The British version of the Racketeer nickel.) So partway through 1897 and in all of 1898, 99, 00 and 01 the farthings were deliberately blackened at the mint before they were released.  So at some point in the past that second coin was scrubbed to remove the black finish. 

  2. On 2/13/2022 at 8:08 PM, VKurtB said:

    Offer a nice sum to even SEE an ultra-rarity in an effort to “flush one out of hiding”. It’s not going to work, assuming the holders of any 1964 Peace dollars aren’t really stupid. They’d be seized under the Langbord precedent.

    They haven't seized the Toven 1974 Aluminum cent.  They have said it's government property, but they have made no attempt to recover it.  Now if it were to be put up for public auction then I'm sure they would try to confiscate it.

  3. On 2/8/2022 at 3:20 PM, Mr.Bill347 said:

    It appears to be a 1795 flowing hair cent with a reeded edge.

    Not even close.

    1795 S-76 The real question is does it have a lettered edge or a plan edge.  The lettered edge (S-76a) is an R-5 (31 to 75 known) and the plain edge (S-76b) is an R-1 (over 1000 estimated to exist)  The S-76 plain edge is the most common of the 1795 cents.  That said this is not in the typical condition seen.  This is a very desirable coin.

  4. On 1/30/2022 at 2:40 PM, RWB said:

    If Rittenhouse and friends were trying to make something special, why use a patched planchet. Why select a planchet with adjustment marks?

    Those are also my arguments against it being the first.

    Now it IS one of the first coins.  The die clearly had some polishing done to it to give the PL surfaces to the theoretical first/presentation coin and those polished surfaces were still present when this coin was struck.  Another proof of it being one of the first coins struck is that it is the earliest die stage known for the 1794 dollars, and is the only dollar known from this die stage.  So this could conceivably be the second dollar or at least one of the first few.

  5. Circulating, No.  But there are two legal tender non-circulating coins with Trump on them.  1000 and 5000 Franc coins of Equatorial Guinea.  Issued in 2017.

     

    And just wait, eventually we will most likely have a Trump presidential dollar.  (For those who really hate him, look on the bright side, by the time it happens he will have been dead for two years.  Yes I know, you'd like to see his new dollar coin as soon as possible.)

  6. On 2/2/2022 at 12:59 AM, Dacid Vigil said:

    Sugar coated? Hmmm interesting choice of words

    Old expression.  Many years ago medicines, pills etc. especially bad tasting ones would be made with a sugar coating to make them more palatable or "easier to take"  it.  So "sugar coating" ones words would mean to express them in ways so as to make them gentler or easier to accept.  Non-offensive.

  7. On 1/27/2022 at 12:21 PM, Mr.Bill347 said:

    Just store them away. Its a first year design change

    Second year of the design, these are 2022 rolls.

    Raw coins are around $32 each, grading (if you send in 5 or more) costs around $28 each so then you've got $60 each in the coins.  Already graded MS-69's can be purchased for $44 each, MS-70's for around $55.  If it was me, I wouldn't bother sending them in.

    Now if you were sending in several monster boxes at a time and could get the slabbing fees down, then it might be worth it.  Or if you were a distributor and were buying direct from the Mint at $25 each that would help as well.

  8. On 1/25/2022 at 12:34 PM, gmarguli said:

    It's the ultimate non-collectible series. 

    • Too short to be a challenge for a determined person.
    • Too expensive for most collectors to collect in nice condition. 
    • A few stoppers (price) in lower grades for a lot of collectors.
    • Way too many counterfeits that fool even the dealers. 

    And two stoppers that only the very wealthy can afford that keep you from having a complete set (1884 10 known, and 1885 5 known)