• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

“”

Member
  • Posts

    415
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by “”

  1. Actually both Sandon and powermad5000 are both incorrect. On Roosevelt dimes PCGS uses the term FB. NGC uses the term FT. NGC is much more stringent on their grading and determination for the FT designation much more so than PCGS is on the FB designation.

     

    Based on the hit crossing the bottom bands, NGC mostly likely would not designate this as a FT specimen. On the other hand their probably a 50 - 50 chance that PCGS would award the FB designation to your dime if it were submitted for grading.

  2. I own quite a few coins with the * designation including some that have the + and *. Most do have attractive toning generally on both sides of the coin, but some are toned only on one side. In addition, I own quite a few proof coins with the * designation. 
     

    If anyone cares to take a look at EBay, do a search for 1965, 1966 or 1967 SMS coins and check out the * coins in nickels, dimes, quarters and halves!

     

  3. On 3/14/2023 at 12:48 PM, JamieinMN said:

    Just received my coins back and pretty happy with the results. 
     

    l’m curious though, does NGC notify PCGS when they crossover coins (and visa versa) to update census and remove serial numbers from being active?    

    59CC0568-D046-4B79-A270-2F631903CE11.jpeg

    To my knowledge, no they do not. I still have the PCGS inserts from crossover submissions from 4 years ago. When I insert the cert. no. into their database the coin is still there.

    At this point, the census on both sides is not really close at all. Due to the crossover, crack out and resubmissions never being notified to the TPG. PCGS as well as NGC will delete the data from their respective data if you notify them and return the inserts.

  4. On 3/13/2023 at 4:58 PM, Hoghead515 said:

    Ive thought about it . Several of the coins I was looking to sell are in the $40 to $50 range. 

    If you do send to GC for auction you may wish to instruct them to start the auctions at $1.00 By doing that your selling fees are reduced significantly.

     

  5. On 3/8/2023 at 1:37 PM, VKurtB said:

    Or even why bother with ANYTHING online, right? I mean, heck, Cliff Mishler sure doesn’t “do” online, right? Know what I use to “connect” with collectors of similar interests? Planes, trains, and automobiles. I even got to rap face to face with Administrator Lisa on this site last week. No avatar. The living breathing Lisa. 
     

    By the way, I also use NGC’s database, but not the registry. No registry is required to use the database. 

    I don't understand your point. I have traveled as well and mentioned that I have met collectors with similar interests. And perhaps some may not have the financial means to travel as you have.

    I also know how and do use the database often but can look at a specific set within the registry and see all the sets listed in one place. 

    How do you know Cliff does not "do" online? You don't "do" the registry thing, but you do "do" online.