• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Revenant

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    3,597
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Posts posted by Revenant

  1. On 10/10/2021 at 9:48 AM, imperatorcoaticus97 said:

    So, so far I’ve been using non latex non blah blah blah medical gloves to handle my coins. Should I switch to cotton? 

    For coins I've always heard cotton recommended. They're soft and they don't have the powders and chemicals on them that latex gloves do. I also don't know if latex gloves use the same plasticizers that make pvc so bad for coins.

  2. On 10/9/2021 at 6:27 PM, Mohawk said:

    Indeed it is!! It sounds like you've found a good shop....if I were in Massachusetts, I'd be asking you if they had any ancients for sale.  We used to do stuff like that for kids at the shop I worked at as well....we'd give them any gold plated State Quarters that came in, along with Kennedy Halves, Sac Dollars and even low grade Indian Cents, Liberty Nickels and Buffalo Nickels.  It was amazing to see their eyes light up....you can't beat that experience.  The kids are honestly one of the things I miss the most about that job....they were great!

    There's a store near my office that has a small display of ancients but all their stuff is graded so I don't think you'd be game. Lol

  3. On 10/8/2021 at 9:45 PM, VKurtB said:

    When was the last time in your life that a new version of software did NOT ruin everything you liked about it? I cannot remember the last time. 

    The proprietary software my company uses to do most of our work gets usually 1-2 major updates a year with new features and such. It tends to get better over time and the new features are nice, but sometimes weird bugs pop up that we mostly resolve in beta. The unfortunate thing here is that we're all unofficial beta testers. lol

  4. On 10/8/2021 at 11:10 AM, comicdonna said:

    I have been having the same problem.  It took me a while to see that I had to sign out on the home page before I could sign in.  Something is not right.  The CGC chat boards have been having serious 500 errors that have been going on for months.  Dena has posted there that a fix is coming soon.  Maybe one is coming here, too.

    I have the same problems.

    This place is probably in near constant Flux as they work on underlying stuff to improve the site and add new features. Sometimes you accidentally break things and that seems to be what may have happened here.

    I'm sure they'll get to patched at some point.

    It's annoying in the mean time but maybe something good is coming down the pipe.

  5. On 10/6/2021 at 12:31 PM, Jason Abshier said:

    I read somewhere the $1 trillion dollar coin was supposed to be 10 feet in diameter and 2 feet thick ! Crazy . No way they would be able to make a coin that big with machinery and cost that would be involved to make it 

    I think it was Canada that made some huge gold coin as a 1-off or 2-off design that was a literal museum piece from the start and they sold 1 more of them to a private party. Odd stuff...

  6. On 10/6/2021 at 6:33 AM, Fenntucky Mike said:

    The face value of the coin would be $1T, the coin would probably only be as big as it would need to in order to fit that many 0's on it. lol Or the word "Trillion".

    I think you'd just get "Trillion," That's the route Venezuela took with the 1 Million Bolivares notes. That's actually the approach most groups take, which is what makes the P-91 Zimbabwean note so unique - they were the only ones shameless enough to put 14 zeros behind a 1 lol to spell it all out!

    Incidentally - a random fact I've become aware of in recent reading - apparently the 2003-dated $10 and $25 coins were not released in 2003. They were released in Aug 2008, after the 2nd redenomination, with / alongside the new 2007-dated 3rd dollar banknotes. So instead of being valued at 10 and 25 ZWD, they were valued at 10 and 25 ZWR, which was equal to 100 Trillion and 250 Trillion ZWD. lol

  7. I mean... Biden's administration is just talking about something that they talked about when Obama was president and Biden was the VP and the same nonsense was going on. They didn't do it then and they won't do it now because it is the nuclear option. It is crossing the Rubicon. If you do this you can't even pretend like Congress and the Legislative branch matter anymore and it just becomes 100% a clown show and they will NEVER do this because of how this could be used the second the shoe is on the other foot. Just  my 2 cents.

  8. On 10/1/2021 at 10:04 PM, Woods020 said:

    Not true. Art is cleaned often without enhancement. It’s more about keeping it from damage over time. I’m staying out of the coin debate but museums have teams of people who clean and preserve pieces with no intention of improving. They simply want it to stay as is for as long as possible. 

    The word conservation - as opposed to preservation - includes repair as well as simple preservation. 

  9. On 9/24/2021 at 7:00 AM, Winesteven said:

    I see NGC now placed the proper photo in the "Obverse" photo area. However, they put that same photo of my obverse slab in the "Reverse" photo area instead of the large photo of the reverse of this 1908 Indian. For the time being I deleted the incorrect photo in that "Reverse" photo area. I cannot add the correct large Reverse photo of the 1908 Indian, as whenever I try, the slab obverse photo comes back. Hopefully NGC can do for this reverse photo area what they successfully did for the Obverse photo area (in getting my desired photo for that area in place).

    Thanks, greatly appreciated.

    Steve

    I was having a problem similar to this with a new photo not replacing and old one and I think it was because my high resolution photo was over 4 MB. I reduced the image resolution and file size and it took.

  10. On 9/23/2021 at 6:27 PM, Quintus Arrius said:

    It is my understanding, possibly dead-wrong, that any picture-taking would require a coin be posed in its raw state, a polite way of saying disrobed or de-encapsulated.  If that were to occur -- and I have not ruled it out -- the coin would then have to be re-encapsulated.

    Required? I don't know. There are some slabs that are just so scratched and beat to hell. Personally, I think I did really good with my 10G set when they came back home, all 8 in pristine, new, unmarked, scratch-resistant holders. But, even then I have to deal with the prongs / supports blocking out part of the rim, so the images might fail your test on that basis.

    Set Details | NGC Registry | NGC (ngccoin.com)

     

    3436139_Full_Obv.jpg

    3436139_Full_Rev.jpg