• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

“”

Member
  • Posts

    415
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by “”

  1. On 1/28/2024 at 11:26 AM, USAuPzlBxBob said:

    The mark is not from a suction cup.

    Consider other scenarios that could have caused the malady.

    Accidents routinely happen on assembly lines, but to small enough extents that the processes are deemed profitable.

    Your coin "slipped" through quality control, you bought it, but then it was up to you to be the final arbiter of its acceptability… and in a timely manner.

    Live and learn.

    P.S.  Good thread.  Thank you.

    He said it could not be returned which is disappointing to say the least.

    i prefer purchasing these types of issues already slabbed by a TPG so these types of issues are more easily avoided.

  2. On 1/27/2024 at 7:50 AM, J P M said:

    No questions are stupid it is how we learn. I have been around a long time, and I find new information every day because someone asked a question. 

    It can sure seem they’re stupid around here more often than necessary based on some responses. That gets followed by explanations of excuses as to why said responses weren’t really meant to be rude acknowledging pretty much that they are / were.

    I understand there are trolls and bad posts and people in general who don’t care about our hobby. But I also believe if we wish our hobby to be sustained we need to be a little more careful with those “newbies” who have a genuine interest. Perhaps we need to show a little more patience and understanding that no they don’t know all the correct terminology or nuances of our hobby and we need to help them learn in a more positive way.

     

  3. On 1/22/2024 at 10:31 PM, Midwest Dozer said:

    well i wish i would have tested the waters before i threw that question out their..  and apparently dont say cleaned in a sentence.. i really wish they NGC would have taken a picture of the coin while they had it. maybe it was graded back in the day but i dont know  feel free to look the coin up ive been searching for pictures of it. i did email them and got the slab number. number as follows 6529202-005 i can do that i added it to my set already without pictures..  

     

    IMG_1177.png

  4. The Roosevelt dimes in the silver years of 1946 - 1964 is a great set and can be economical to collect in relatively high grades. There are quite a few collectors who seek out FT specimens only which by NGC standards is the toughest in the industry. In order to qualify as a FT specimen the top and bottom bands must be fully split. In addition, the vertical bands must show definition.
     

    There are several dates and mints that are famous for beautiful toning  from sitting in albums for years, especially Wayne Raymond albums. Several of the original mint sets from the 50’s can also impart impressive toning. 


    Toning is in the eyes of the beholder and is sought after in all series by some collectors.

     

  5. On 1/18/2024 at 8:44 AM, edhalbrook said:

    This coin nis ms68*. To me it looks like in the right bottom it's corroded. Is it not? 

    I do see however on some of my dimes the bottom band is lacking. A weak strike I guess. How can you tell a really good dime that might be worthy of grading? Not that I'm going to send any in but I wonder what ones are the very best. 

    4510602_Full_Obv.jpg

    4510602_Full_Rev.jpg

    I own this coin and I assure you it is has no corrosion.

  6. On 12/18/2023 at 4:23 PM, powermad5000 said:

    It sounds like the seller you purchased this from was using "stock" photos. Did the seller have more than one of these for sale in the listing? If so, that would explain the difference in the coin in hand and the photo on the sellers listing page. I typically will not buy from a seller that uses stock photos as you will not get the coin in the photo (which the seller is likely to use the best coin in the lot to take the photo). Hopefully you bought from a seller that accepts returns as it sounds like you are not happy with the coin that arrived at your door. I would return the coin and maybe look for a seller that is not using stock photos and is selling only one of these coins.

    As for the registry photos, I am not a registry participant, but I have looked into the process. Nobody can "upload" photos to the registry or to NGC. You can upload photos here in the forum, but not for any grading/certification/registry purposes (I do not know how the PCGS end of this works). You go and look up the NGC cert number on their verification and then you can click a button to claim the coin as yours and add it to your registry set.

    You can contact NGC customer service and ask for a specific date of when a coin was graded, but I am not sure how this fits into what is taking place here. You can "estimate" an approximate range of the date when it was graded based on the cert number on the slab and where the submission numbers are starting out at now although this won't be helpful if you don't submit your own coins to NGC.

    Yes you can upload your own photos to your registry. Once a PCGS coin is confirmed and accepted into your registry set you are free to upload those photos as well.

  7. On 10/21/2023 at 8:01 AM, J P M said:

    Lucy. We have not seen the other side but I have to say. Getting a 67 on that coin was a gift . It has lots of hits and a scratch that goes from two a clock to four a clock. I hope you have some more with good grades out of 30 coins.  

    I bet that is a die crack from two o’clock to four. If that was a scratch, NGC would have body bagged that coin with no grade.