• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Conder Collectors - Post Your Images
3 3

606 posts in this topic

Well I cracked out some of my Conders and here is one that upgraded:

 

Before

 

DH-1038BMiddlesexNGCAU58.jpg

 

After - I thought it was undergraded for NGC grading standards at least, I guess I was correct.

 

Best, HT

 

DH-1038bMiddlesexNGCMS63CFL_zpse2b627ac.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I couldn't resist picking this one up for the price! I'll buy MS graded Conders (even those minted by the ton) for $90 all day long. :) There is a bit of weakness to the strike on the obverse lower right (and the corresponding reverse upper right). I'm guessing it's due to a slightly thin area of the flan. Lots of red left on the reverse.

 

1794_Kent_Hawkhurst_DH30_NGC_MS64RB_composite_zpsa9e9fbd6.jpg

 

1794_Kent_Hawkhurst_DH30_NGC_MS64RB_obv_zpsb0f6dbff.jpg

1794_Kent_Hawkhurst_DH30_NGC_MS64RB_rev_zps06420e86.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why we like Pidcock's - abit of history in a newspaper clip from the 1790's:

 

RhinoLyceum_zps0f4b6302.jpg

 

And a Rhino/Elephant Pidcock's, not my best image but wanted to post with the clipping above. Very different luster and toning on each side.

 

Best, HT

 

DH-416AMiddlesexNGCMS66_zps2e428599.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A nice North Wales Druid, the cypher is 'RNG' (the issuer) as opposed to the PMC (Parys Mine Company) on the Anglesey Druid tokens. DH doesn't know who RNG was on the North Wales Druids of 1793 - has this been found out since and does anyone here know?

 

Best, HT

 

DH-1DNorthWalesNGCMS63_zpseda5f28e.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This token was payable only in Newgate PRISON, the temporary residence of Messrs Symonds, Winterbotham, Ridgway & Holt in 1794 and 1795. These gentlemen were somehow responsible for the manufacture of numerous common commercial tokens from behind bars!* Obviously, no redemption at Newgate was possible but these tokens did circulate widely. Good protest tokens for sure.

 

Per Dalton & Hamer, briefly...

 

• Symonds was publisher of the 'Jockey Club' and the 'Second Part of The Rights of Man.'

• James Ridgway was convicted of the same offenses as Symonds.

• Winterbotham was a dissenting minister convicted for preaching two seditious discourses.

• Daniel Holt, printer of the Newark Herald, for selling some of Paine's writings.

 

Wikipedia-Newgate Prison

 

DH-396BMiddlesexNGCMS64_zps310d59f2.jpg

 

* Just kidding - this token and its siblings were manufactured by Kempson

 

 

Edited by Hard Times
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beautiful Pidcocks 416b with probably the nicest rhino I have ever seen. Images are very good too.

 

Wish it was mine, :whistle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to own a MS67PL Conder token but hadn't seen one til now (or have I)?

 

Ebay MS67PL! Conder token

 

 

It's funny you bring this example up Bob. I have looked at the pictures of that piece a lot since it was posted a few days ago, and I can't fathom how it received that grade. To my eye, I swear that I can see lacquer on it, but maybe I'm just seeing things. (shrug)

 

I have purchased several pieces from this seller over the past few months, and I will say that their ability to photograph the coins is pretty bad. ALL of the pieces I have received looked way better in hand than the pictures in the auction. But, I have a pretty good eye for "interpretation" of bad eBay pictures. That being said, my eyes can't quite figure out how this one would get to the MS67BN PL level.

 

What are your thoughts Bob? Others?

 

-Brandon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to own a MS67PL Conder token but hadn't seen one til now (or have I)?

 

Ebay MS67PL! Conder token

 

 

It's funny you bring this example up Bob. I have looked at the pictures of that piece a lot since it was posted a few days ago, and I can't fathom how it received that grade. To my eye, I swear that I can see lacquer on it, but maybe I'm just seeing things. (shrug)

 

I have purchased several pieces from this seller over the past few months, and I will say that their ability to photograph the coins is pretty bad. ALL of the pieces I have received looked way better in hand than the pictures in the auction. But, I have a pretty good eye for "interpretation" of bad eBay pictures. That being said, my eyes can't quite figure out how this one would get to the MS67BN PL level.

 

What are your thoughts Bob? Others?

 

-Brandon

 

I've also been watching this seller for well over a year and all I can say is he's had some horrific looking exonumia in high graded holders. The variety which I recently purchased off you brg5658 in a 63 holder far out shined the sellers 66 which I personally feel should have been in a 62 holder. I personally haven't purchased from this seller to date but have seen a good amount of his post sale items with 2 dealers at shows. Viewing them in hand the first thought that normally comes to mind = ugh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

wots dis mate? Yer jumpin inta de olde stuf ayre ye, ye scurvy dawg? :roflmao:

 

lol

 

Not to worry HT I normally only pick up these tokens if they tie into U.S. history. I was eying this one for about 2 years before it became available as I also collect coin dealer store cards. So this Spence had going for it for me with the full coin dealer reverse instead of just dealer in coins on the edge along with an American Indian on the obverse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to own a MS67PL Conder token but hadn't seen one til now (or have I)?

 

Ebay MS67PL! Conder token

 

 

It's funny you bring this example up Bob. I have looked at the pictures of that piece a lot since it was posted a few days ago, and I can't fathom how it received that grade. To my eye, I swear that I can see lacquer on it, but maybe I'm just seeing things. (shrug)

 

I have purchased several pieces from this seller over the past few months, and I will say that their ability to photograph the coins is pretty bad. ALL of the pieces I have received looked way better in hand than the pictures in the auction. But, I have a pretty good eye for "interpretation" of bad eBay pictures. That being said, my eyes can't quite figure out how this one would get to the MS67BN PL level.

 

What are your thoughts Bob? Others?

 

-Brandon

 

I've also been watching this seller for well over a year and all I can say is he's had some horrific looking exonumia in high graded holders. The variety which I recently purchased off you brg5658 in a 63 holder far out shined the sellers 66 which I personally feel should have been in a 62 holder. I personally haven't purchased from this seller to date but have seen a good amount of his post sale items with 2 dealers at shows. Viewing them in hand the first thought that normally comes to mind = ugh!

 

I'd have to agree with you on this count. I have been very picky on which of this sellers tokens I have bid on. I won't touch that MS67BN PL token; to me it just looks funny (and over graded by 2 or more points).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have to agree with you on this count. I have been very picky on which of this sellers tokens I have bid on. I won't touch that MS67BN PL token; to me it just looks funny (and over graded by 2 or more points).

 

I'll go 3 points as IMHO just a couple years ago that's something that would have landed in a MS64 holder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, someone thought it was worth almost $500! Good grief, I think they bought the holder on this one, not the token. (shrug)

 

To each his/her own.

 

138558.jpg.5121c6d7c83c1388ce4d4668ecf49f85.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least they got the attribution right.

 

 

Here is one I just purchased out of the Goldberg Pre-Long Beach sale last weekend. I'm not quite sure why.

 

213662.jpg213662N2.jpg

 

They had it listed as an Essex 3 which of course it isn't. The Essex 3 is listed as Rare. Over the past decade I've seen between two and three dozen Essex 3's up for sale, and with the exception of one piece every single one of them was an Essex 4. Just like this one. This piece will be a slight upgrade for my previous coin. not sure why I paid what I did for just a small upgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BRG was nice enough to point out the first Conder token he's seen that was slabbed by PCGS

(other than the US related ones which I've studiously ignored).

 

Somerset 50

 

Putting aside the BIN, here's a few observations on this sample of one.

 

-The camel is on the obverse not the India house if you follow D&H. I hope PCGS has one.

 

-World coins apparently are graded with the "Secure" service (and fee) regardless of value.

I'm still not sure what "Secure" gets me as a buyer of such an item.

 

-Although the edge is visible in the pronged slab, there is no indication on the slab of the edge

(and none in the Ebay listing either) so who knows if the attribution is correct.

For fun, I've sent a note to the seller asking about the edge.

 

-A nice plus for PCGS would be if they started to include non-US Conders in their population report

(but I couldn't find the PCGS number for this Conder in the online report.) :( Here's what comes up

for the tokens' cert verification. I'm lost.

27541545 cert verification

 

-Coming from Austria. Submitted and graded at one of the European centers perhaps?

 

According to the seller of the PCGS Somerset 50, the edge reads "PAYABLE BY * M. LAMBE & SON"

as expected for a Somerset 50. I hope I didn't raise unrealistic hopes that I'd pay $298 for it.

 

Edited by yarm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Make sure you tell us what the edge is. Lots of possibilities for this coin, including the "pay one penny" edge. The D&H 8 one penny token used the same dies, just on a thicker planchet. And there is one subvarity of the penny and one of the halfpenny that each have plain edges. Only way to tell them apart is by weight and planchet thickness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cert verification just showed up today...but, strangely, the PCGS website lists it as being the Norfolk DH-19?? WTH is going on over there? I guess they are still working out the kinks? lol

 

 

pcgs_conder_screenshot_zps592c91c4.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wanted an example of a druid token, so I got this one from Bill McKivor. I'm very happy with it.

 

1788_Anglesey_DH275_Halfpenny_McKivor_ExLincoln_composite_zps4fe837e7.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chil_8R_1839-Stacks_both.jpg

 

This is my Condor, I'm looking for an unc one of these instead of just an AU though.

Edited by Gallienus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
3 3