-
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
-
Posts
10,047 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
90
Reputation Activity
-
Conder101 got a reaction from GoldFinger1969 in Perfect 70's
The first US coin to get a 70 grade was a 1964 proof cent. It got bid up to $40,000 but it had developed spots and PCGS withdrew their grade guarantee before it sold and made a private deal with the owner to get it off the market.
The first circulation coin to get a 70 grade was a PCGS 1973 Lincoln cent. Which also subsequently developed spots.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from Hoghead515 in Perfect 70's
In many, if not all cases, the milk spots developed or became visible after the coins were slabbed.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from Mr.Bill347 in Quest to obtain all half dollar examples
No completely different reverse design
Definitely a different type, not a die variety.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from Henri Charriere in What's your upper limit for buying Raw?
No because for set registries you have to have slabbed coins and I am buying raw coins. It's just that in the series I collect they often don't come cheap, even in low grade.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from rrantique in What's your upper limit for buying Raw?
No because for set registries you have to have slabbed coins and I am buying raw coins. It's just that in the series I collect they often don't come cheap, even in low grade.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from rrantique in What's your upper limit for buying Raw?
I'm with Kurt, my upper limit is my budget. So far the highest I've gone has been $6,000. (also the most expensive coin I have purchased)
-
Conder101 got a reaction from Henri Charriere in What's your upper limit for buying Raw?
I'm with Kurt, my upper limit is my budget. So far the highest I've gone has been $6,000. (also the most expensive coin I have purchased)
-
Conder101 got a reaction from JT2 in Quest to obtain all half dollar examples
No completely different reverse design
Definitely a different type, not a die variety.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from powermad5000 in Quest to obtain all half dollar examples
No completely different reverse design
Definitely a different type, not a die variety.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from J P M in 1795 Silver Dollar - Draped Bust Off-center
It's actually a fake of a fake. This piece is a fake, and it is copied from a vampire hub counterfeit.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from Highlander4wd in Prussia 10 mark Wilhelm I 1872 - 1873. Why so many?
It's a result of the Franco-Prussian War 1870-71. France lost and had to pay reparations of 5 billion francs to Prussia. Much a of it probably came as French gold.coin. These were melted down and struck into the Prussian coins. As you say there were 12 Million 10 Mark pieces struck in just two years 1872-73. You compare this to the 12 million struck from 1890-1912, that's 12 million over a 22 years period so no individual year had that many coins. So if the survival rates were relatively the same, there would be a lot fewer high grade coins from the 1890 - 1912 era available than from 1871-72.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from The Neophyte Numismatist in Prussia 10 mark Wilhelm I 1872 - 1873. Why so many?
It's a result of the Franco-Prussian War 1870-71. France lost and had to pay reparations of 5 billion francs to Prussia. Much a of it probably came as French gold.coin. These were melted down and struck into the Prussian coins. As you say there were 12 Million 10 Mark pieces struck in just two years 1872-73. You compare this to the 12 million struck from 1890-1912, that's 12 million over a 22 years period so no individual year had that many coins. So if the survival rates were relatively the same, there would be a lot fewer high grade coins from the 1890 - 1912 era available than from 1871-72.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from Sandon in Prussia 10 mark Wilhelm I 1872 - 1873. Why so many?
It's a result of the Franco-Prussian War 1870-71. France lost and had to pay reparations of 5 billion francs to Prussia. Much a of it probably came as French gold.coin. These were melted down and struck into the Prussian coins. As you say there were 12 Million 10 Mark pieces struck in just two years 1872-73. You compare this to the 12 million struck from 1890-1912, that's 12 million over a 22 years period so no individual year had that many coins. So if the survival rates were relatively the same, there would be a lot fewer high grade coins from the 1890 - 1912 era available than from 1871-72.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from rrantique in Perfect 70's
The first US coin to get a 70 grade was a 1964 proof cent. It got bid up to $40,000 but it had developed spots and PCGS withdrew their grade guarantee before it sold and made a private deal with the owner to get it off the market.
The first circulation coin to get a 70 grade was a PCGS 1973 Lincoln cent. Which also subsequently developed spots.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from Mike Meenderink in Perfect 70's
In many, if not all cases, the milk spots developed or became visible after the coins were slabbed.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from Mike Meenderink in Perfect 70's
The first US coin to get a 70 grade was a 1964 proof cent. It got bid up to $40,000 but it had developed spots and PCGS withdrew their grade guarantee before it sold and made a private deal with the owner to get it off the market.
The first circulation coin to get a 70 grade was a PCGS 1973 Lincoln cent. Which also subsequently developed spots.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from J P M in Perfect 70's
The first US coin to get a 70 grade was a 1964 proof cent. It got bid up to $40,000 but it had developed spots and PCGS withdrew their grade guarantee before it sold and made a private deal with the owner to get it off the market.
The first circulation coin to get a 70 grade was a PCGS 1973 Lincoln cent. Which also subsequently developed spots.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from ldhair in 1917 Wheat Penny - Is this Is this class V doubling or pivoted hub doubling?
The problem is on the DDO the 1's show strong notching at the bases and the upper end of the curl of the 9 does as well. The subject coin shows no thrace of that notching and in fact the bases of the 1's appear to be thinner than they should if the notching was just blurred by wear. I don't see anything that would convince me this is the 1917 DDO.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from rrantique in Double and triple stamped dime
The coin is not just triple struck it is also broadstruck with another planchet in the coining chamber below it so no rev image.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from GoldFinger1969 in Another confirmation of 1894-S dimes
Thanks for clarifying that for me Zadok.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from Henri Charriere in Foreign Coin Funkiness
The 1966 date was the date the design was adopted, the actual striking date as I said is found incused into the two stars. This was a common practice with Spanish coins from 1949 to 1982..
-
Conder101 got a reaction from J P M in Double and triple stamped dime
The coin is not just triple struck it is also broadstruck with another planchet in the coining chamber below it so no rev image.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from powermad5000 in Double and triple stamped dime
The coin is not just triple struck it is also broadstruck with another planchet in the coining chamber below it so no rev image.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from ldhair in Double and triple stamped dime
The coin is not just triple struck it is also broadstruck with another planchet in the coining chamber below it so no rev image.
-
Conder101 got a reaction from ldhair in Foreign Coin Funkiness
The 1966 date was the date the design was adopted, the actual striking date as I said is found incused into the two stars. This was a common practice with Spanish coins from 1949 to 1982..