-
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
-
Posts
369 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
NGC Journals
Gallery
Events
Store
Downloads
Posts posted by R__Rash
-
-
On 6/19/2024 at 4:13 PM, The Neophyte Numismatist said:
My first coin for the set is probably the most common in the series - 1912-D (PCGS50). However, this one had "the look" I am after - a medium toned grey with luster underneath. I want original coins, and this will slow me down as much as anything else in this series. My goal is to have every coin look very similar to this one in condition, color, luster and eye appeal.
Very nice starter….
-
- Henri Charriere and tj96
-
2
-
On 5/21/2024 at 6:43 PM, The Neophyte Numismatist said:
I'll have what he's having!
Just got home from Illinois
lock the front door
OH Boy!………………
looking out my back door…..
-
-
On 1/13/2024 at 8:56 AM, Ollie3677 said:
I have shown you where a coin was verified to have missing clad error on one side of a dime before striking, (copper showing as in your op question) now the question is has there ever been verification of clad error missing from both sides of the same coin before being struck. 🤔
I don’t want you to think I am suggesting these coins have any great monetary value but knowledge of all the possibile whys are very valuable when searching..
-
-
On 1/13/2024 at 1:38 PM, EagleRJO said:
I don't appreciate your condescending remarks. I have no desire tracking down what you are the one claiming exists which I have not previously seen, and now believe to be just you blowing smoke that a coin with a similar appearance was attributed by CONECA as a mint error.
Condescending, lol, that was just a nudge, lol…..
-
On 1/13/2024 at 12:51 PM, EagleRJO said:
Are you thinking the darker color is from an improperly annealed planchet and that the other spots or colors are from circulation? Maybe you could post some examples of coins with a similar appearance attributed by CONECA as being a mint error, as opposed to simply opinions in a chat concerning the discoloration.
Apparently you had no desire, or maybe not the ability to search the Coneca online for something so simple.
it seems you hold your opinion at a higher value than that of others. I shared the source and one coin of fact, do I also need to copy and paste for you?
my statement to the OP was that it is not impossible, with proof to verify the statement.
-
The above responses are not totally accurate, it is not impossible for a coin to have a mint clad error before being struck. I have seen coins (Roosevelt dimes) verified by Coneca as being this. How the environment affects these errors in circulation varies from environment to environment
If you would like to read an example, go in to Coneca….forums….and search 2000 D Roosevelt dime
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
-
-
- powermad5000 and JT2
-
2
-
You probably already have it corrected but if not, you have to make sure block “cookies” is in the off position in Safari.
settings/safari/block cookies/off
-
-
c'est la vie
I wish you all well,
the rash
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
- Henri Charriere, ldhair, jimbo27 and 4 others
-
7
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Happy holidays and to all, peace.
- rrantique, Mr_Spud, Henri Charriere and 2 others
-
5
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
- J P M, powermad5000, jimbo27 and 2 others
-
5
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
- powermad5000, robec1347 and Coinbuf
-
3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
- powermad5000, rrantique, lkenefic2 and 2 others
-
5
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
- jimbo27, rrantique, powermad5000 and 2 others
-
5
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
- rrantique, Fenntucky Mike and jimbo27
-
3
1849 pattern double eagle gold coin smithsonian private issue 2016 1/10 999 fine
in Newbie Coin Collecting Questions
Posted · Edited by R__Rash
Spell
@Coinbuf, @RWB, @Mike Meenderink , and @ldhair, this brings up a question in my mind that you all could maybe cipher on for me. The OP post an NGC UCam gem proof. The great examples Mike provided are PF70 UCam. Am I wrong or does NGC consider gem or gem proof to be between PF or MS66 and PF or MS69 and labeled so as being understood, explaining no numeric for grade. If so How then would the value be affected?
Also why would there be no bar code for identification.