• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

gmarguli

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    17,367
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by gmarguli

  1. 1 hour ago, MarkFeld said:

    I’m not at all familiar with those coins, but my guess is MS63. That’s due to the discoloration on the cheek and neck, the marks on the lower right part of the neck and upper left portion of the cap, the marks beneath and to the left of the rooster, the marks on the left wing and the marks behind its neck and head. That said, the pictures aren’t very clear. And for all I know, the coin could have rub/be AU and/or have altered surfaces.

    Regardless of how it was graded by PCGS, NGC or anyone else, that says nothing about the validity of the thread originator’s complaints.

    Very lousy pictures to grade from. The obverse picture is so bright that it could easily be hiding a ton of marks. The discoloration on the neck (and ribbon on same horizontal line from it) are chips in the die that gave this coin a raised area. I suspect the mark behind the neck is die polish which is common to run 12:00 to 6:00 on these coins.

    Based on what I can see, I'd guess PCGS graded it MS66. 

  2. 1 hour ago, NevadaS&G said:

    Apparently you can't read and jump to conclusions. I stated that I paid Express Service for one coin which is 5 Days. Turnaround time was 30 Days. The coin was Inaccurately Graded. I have sent PCGS Numerous Emails regarding this matter this morning, last week, a month ago, as usual no response from the chickens. They must be in hiding.

    Turnaround times are not guaranteed. They are estimates. 

    FYI, last time an Express too around a month (on a very common coin) I complained and they gave me a free Express submissions. And BTW, after taking a month they undergraded the coin by a point in my opinion (and the opinion of NGC after I sent it to them).

  3. 7 hours ago, Alex in PA. said:

    "March 25, 2004

    NGC is slightly looser above MS65, but I believe that is a good thing. With PCGS you have a grade distribution like this:

     

    MS66: 131

    MS67: 52

    MS68: 0

     

    With NGC it is frequently:

    MS66: 127

    MS67: 43

    MS68: 7

     

    Some people point to this as NCG being looser or PCGS be more conservative. I believe it shows that NGC is being more accurate in its grading. With PCGS they have lumped a bunch of coins into one top grade. Perhaps all those coins do technically grade MS67. However, the marketplace values the higher quality examples more than the lower quality examples. With PCGS you have to take the dealers word or know how to grade them. With NGC they have put the top few "possibly technically MS67", yet superb for the grade coins into a higher grade slab to separate them from the rest. Basically, they have helped rank the quality of the coins. PCGS has taken MS66.8-to-MS68.2 coins and put them in MS67 slabs. NGC has taken the MS67.8+ coins and put them in MS68 slabs".

    This person sounds very wise. hm

  4. 1 hour ago, GoldFinger1969 said:

    Do overseas people -- and some Americans -- really want to finger-up their coins...have friends touching them....risk damage to their coins/bills ?

    Yes. In fact, I have been told several times by Europeans that the reason they don't like slabs is that they like to touch the coins.

    Of course, these same people slab their coins when going to sell them. 

  5. 34 minutes ago, Coinbuf said:

    At this point everything is all speculation, but there have been some comments by the management ats fairly recently about their continued development of AI.  I do not remember exactly what was said or when or where I read that, but one possibility is the new ownership group may wish to ramp up that technology as a cost cutting measure.  I could see AI being used on the huge amount of bulk mint product grading which could lead to faster turnaround times and less overhead of jr graders.  That may not provide a massive cost saving but a little here and some there may be part of the plan.

    The cost of creating the AI technology would be massive. The cost of the bulk/modern graders is small. No bulk grader is going to be buying a penthouse and driving a Ferrari. They just don't make a lot of money. How much can they pay these graders when they're charging $5-$7 a coin for grading? 

    What the (potential) new owners will do with the company remains to be seen. I doubt massive changes at PCGS. CU had very solid profit margins. Their profit growth outpaced their revenue growth over the past couple years. This was probably helped by their cutting a few high salary people including one giant dead weight and one clueless fool. PCGS has been very good at nickel & diming its customers. I'm sure the new owners will find a few more ways. It wouldn't surprise me if they sold off some things like the Long Beach Show and CoinFacts. 

  6. 14 hours ago, Just Bob said:

    I guess I am just dense, but I don't understand the point of this paragraph at all. In fact, this whole thread has me confused. I have no idea what you are trying to say.

    He's trying to say that because some organization approved of some tokens, they are now magically coins. General Winfield Scott led his forces from Vera Cruz to Mexico City at the Battle of Chapultepec. This battle is often called "the Halls of Montezuma"  which is part of the first line of the US Marines official "Marine's Hymn." This cannot be ignored.