• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

JKK

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    3,799
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    52

Posts posted by JKK

  1. On 3/17/2024 at 9:23 AM, Kinlar said:

    i would like to start with "actual" romans so anything before 476 AD, i know a bit about roman history but next to nothing when it come to numismatics. i have no references, not sure what you mean by that but i would love suggestions. Greek alphabet knowledge is not too well. i would like to begin with roman coins and as i learn see what other cultures interest me. i haven't bought any yet. my goal isn't to get rich i just want to own a piece of history, this is for personal pleasure not monetary 

    I get it about the appeal. I have a museum in my house; it's the size of a typical 3-ring notebook, because that's what it is. It contains coins up to twenty-five centuries old. However, given how many people show up here waving parking lot coins they think represent their early retirement, it's necessary to make clear that the money angle is rarely feasible. Glad we got that out of the way.

    As for Romans, "anything before 476" is still a very broad era. I would further divide it:

    • Republic (280-27 BCE)
    • Suetonian (27 BCE-96 CE)
    • Pax Romana (96-192 CE)
    • Barracks Era (192-284 CE)
    • Fourth Century (284-410 CE)
    • Western Downfall (410-476 CE)
    • Provincial (roughly the Western Imperial times; this is where the Greek alphabet comes into play, so start studying)

    Obviously, the names do not directly correspond to actual eras. They represent eras of numismatic styles. The knowledge applicable to a given coin somewhat transfers to others of that era. Put another way, if you're a stud with Republic denarii, that doesn't mean jack for Barracks Era billon antoniniani. (Get ready to learn a whole new vocabulary. Billon means debased silver; essentially copper with a sprinkling of silver in some form. It's what emperors did when they had spent the treasury broke.)

    For the budget collector (and of great use even for people willing to spend a bunch of money for out-of-print references) one begins with Wildwinds. If you really get into it, and are ready to start spending money, begin with Rasiel Suárez's Aorta. Try and snag one for two figures. This is the most concentrated Roman imperial reference available. Have magnification. If you really really love this, or if it's actually less expensive (like right this moment), splurge instead for ERIC II. Unless you're a weightlifter, make sure you own a hand truck to move it around. Also by Ras, this is like Aorta but with color images, more comprehensive listings (a feat, considering Aorta's sheer density of information), easier reading (can get away with lighter mag), and continues until 1453 CE (Aorta stops the Eastern emperors just before Arcadius).

    If you love this stuff, you'll end up wanting the Sear references: volumes I-V plus Greek Imperial. Another useful item is the two-volume Coinage & History of the Roman Empire. When you recover from the heart attack you get looking at the price, start looking for a cheaper version. I'd say if you see the pair for <$100, consider pulling the trigger.

    The way we typically attribute ancients is by catalog numbers as well as descriptions. I've never seen anyone but me use Aorta catalog numbers, but they exist; same for ERIC II, which is like Aorta after a Hulklike transformation. Sear (S-nnn), Roman Imperial Coinage (RIC x, nnn), Sear Greek Imperial (SGI-nnn), and others exist. You won't have to dig through Wildwinds for long to see such attribution references.

    Once you get into this, you'll start to see that there about about five things to be found on a Roman coin of a given size/material/weight/denomination: obverse device, obverse legend, reverse device, reverse legend, and exergue/fields. The exergue is the bottom reverse, typically the home of mint marks, but fields also matter. For example, a ghamma or thelta (you call them gamma and delta, but that's how they are pronounced in demotic Greek) oficina (sub-mint) mark in the field relates more to the exergue than to the reverse device or legend. Learn to look for and quantify those five things, and in combination with denomination, you have an attribution.

    All that either gets you excited/motivated and you blew out of here early to go look at Wildwinds, or it scares f-bomb out of you and you no longer want to do this. There isn't usually middle ground. If the former, keep asking. If the latter, I get it. There's a reason antiquarians aren't as common as roll hunters and Morgan junkies.

  2. On 3/16/2024 at 10:29 AM, Kinlar said:

    Hey all, I'm brand new to this. Looking to start collecting ancient Roman coins. I have no clue where to even start, any guidance would be much appreciated. 

    Okay. Roman coins span eight hundred years or thereabouts and that's not counting the extra thousand years of Byzantines speaking Greek and calling themselves Roman.

    What timeframe do you want to collect, and what types?

    Do you know much about Roman history and numismatics?

    Do you have any of the accepted references, and if not, would you like suggestions?

    How's your familiarity with the Greek alphabet? Other alphabets you read?

    Are you interested in any other ancients that aren't Roman?

    Have you yet bought any, and if so, would you like to learn good methods of attribution?

    Do you accept that you aren't going to get rich at this? (Most of the US collecting newbies do not, until they get the Ice Bath of Reality. I'd expect better from even a budding antiquarian.)

    The good news for you is that antiquarians have a way of being the most pleasant numismatists and historians you're likely to meet. Those of us who have been at it a while take pride in that. Ask away.

    That'll do for now as food for thought.

  3. On 3/11/2024 at 5:33 AM, double ddo said:

    If that's truly the case, I don't see how it was platted, I got it out of a tin box that I bought from an elderly woman that was full of pennies. This coin an several others in that box were wrapped in a paper towel an sealed in a zip lock bag. The lady didn't plate it for sure and I'll be nice, I darn sure didn't plate it. Your reply has no depth an offers nothing that would lead me in the right direction. You tried, thank you

    It's certainly plated. As for the rest of what you say here, it doesn't even demonstrate notable critical thinking efforts. I can think of no reason anyone would bother to lead you in the right direction after that.

  4. On 3/5/2024 at 3:29 PM, VasquezJ said:

    Has completely full luster and looks like it was ways never circulated. Maybe not quite a MS 70 but I think a grade right under that. 

    If you know the grading standards for 69 and 70, then why are you asking anyone else for their opinion? Send it in so that it can get real quiet around here.

  5. On 3/5/2024 at 2:35 AM, VasquezJ said:

    Im positive its that coin sent it to NGC to get graded since last Wednesday and arrived on Thursday 9:14 am and submission was done for a 3 day turn around Walkthrough and over a week and a half later and status is still sitting on Received but was told I would receive coin back before the end of this week. Every minute that goes by feels like a week seriously but hopefully the grading process start today and get my coin before the end of this week. 

    Well, when it comes back bagged, consider that your first tuition. As long as the otherwise wasted money buys you some knowledge, it wasn't a total loss.

  6. On 3/4/2024 at 1:23 AM, TedHartwell said:

    Thank you both for your responses and also for the suggestions about including sizes and cropping future photos.  This one is definitely dime-sized and fits the 18.8 mm approximate size you mentioned.

    That makes sense because the date's font size is more consistent with Capped bust dimes than with the larger denomination. I would grade if FA-2, myself, but either way the wear is too heavy for it to have much value.

  7. I can tell you why people get testy. It is the sheer level of fantasy and the patience worn away from giving people bad news, time after time, and getting varying responses from acquiescence to questioning to pushback to illiterate insults. Do this long enough, and jading will tend to set in. Try seeing it as we do.

    Everyone has this idea that they will find Big Deals in rolls, or change, or something else obtained at face value. Varieties, errors, some special unique coin--they post daily here with parking lot coins, replated steelies, and shoddy counterfeits that they are certain are Very Special (and presumably valuable and interesting). Okay, that's where they begin. We begin from the reasonable standpoint that, if such things were really that easy to find, and that valuable, they would stop being either because everyone would have found nearly all of them by now. Even a casual read of the Newbie forum supports this, as people seek validation of their supposed errors and Really Special variations, and we wearily tell them no. And yet, in spite of all common sense and even a smidge of critical thinking, the next person comes along and wants to be treated as though we have never been asked these questions before.

    The answer is yes, one can have the truth if one is willing to accept it, but no, one is not entitled to be cuddled while we break the bad news.

    And I'm on the gentle end of that spectrum here. We've got people so crabby and narcissistic that they are not only completely insensitive, but they brag about that as a character strength. We've also got some saints who can do a little cuddling and encouraging, and I leave that to them. In my case I reserve it for people who show special promise, which is rare; the rest of the time I just don't keep engaging.

    Nothing educates us in life like learning to rotate the chessboard and see it through someone else's eyes.

  8. Nothing. While there are a fair number of decent Chinese counterfeits, this one wouldn't fool a reasonably precocious YN. Try and see what happens when you run a magnet over it.

  9. The image is modeled after coins of Alexander, but the legend says "Aleeanaont." Not aware of any historical figure of that name appearing on coins, mainly because I'm pretty sure there aren't any. Obviously, no ancient coin would have the modern name of Greece in the Latin characters.

    I normally ignore posts that can't be bothered to supply weight and diameter, even if I am pretty sure I know what it is at first look, but in this case--whatever it is, it's not an actual coin. Some sort of token, I reckon, probably worth nothing. It almost brings to mind a modern instance of the blundered legends of the Gallic breakaway emperors, on which it was evident that the diemakers weren't even literate. Those are interesting to collect for the sheer ineptitude of the legends.