• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

JKK

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    3,789
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    52

Posts posted by JKK

  1. On 3/23/2024 at 5:59 AM, Jason Abshier said:

    our hobby is being mocked like all of us older collectors are I-D-I-O-T-S don’t know how to strike it rich with basic pocket change!!!!

    Word. I especially love the approach of "So do you have any actual knowledge and experience, or are you some wiseacre just blurting whatever? I've been on Youtube, you know! Don't take me lightly! I've read a crappy book!"

    One thing I've learned is that anyone who starts disrespectful has shown us who they are. We should believe them. If they are rude when just introducing themselves, we can expect them to be themselves going forward and it's unfair and unrealistic to expect anything else, so I just block them on the spot to remind myself not to engage. It never seems to occur to them how many of the Stupid Old Fogeys simply tune them out and never bother to help them again. There's never any point in arguing with that mentality.

  2. On 3/21/2024 at 2:23 PM, JennyleeB said:

    Thanks, can you tell me how you can tell?

    Yes. Three reasons.

    • It was posted here by a new poster. We get them all the time and they are all fake. We understand why people post them, but the answer's always the same.
    • It doesn't look like the real ones. If you look up images of real ones, none of them have this muddy look. Doesn't stop the thieves on BedwEtsy from selling them to the unsuspecting.
    • There are very few real ones and literally millions of replicas. Thus, asking if one were real would be like asking if an unseen lottery ticket was a jackpot winner. One could safely say "no" and lose no sleep.

    If you're wanting more specifics, we don't (or at least we shouldn't; the offenders know who they are) give close feedback on counterfeits. Even if the person asking is not a counterfeiter, such types do watch these boards for useful feedback to make the problem worse, so we should not do so. But take it for gospel this one's a real ugly replica.

  3. In case you want to know what the real payoff is, I'll tell you. It's when someone shows you a badly worn ancient coin where you can barely read the exergue and about half the obverse legend, plus two letters of a reverse legend, and within ten minutes you tell someone exactly what the coin said before that detail was lost. With confidence. They might ask you: "What the f-bomb did you do? Summon a demon?" And you'll just smile.

  4. On 3/17/2024 at 9:23 AM, Kinlar said:

    i would like to start with "actual" romans so anything before 476 AD, i know a bit about roman history but next to nothing when it come to numismatics. i have no references, not sure what you mean by that but i would love suggestions. Greek alphabet knowledge is not too well. i would like to begin with roman coins and as i learn see what other cultures interest me. i haven't bought any yet. my goal isn't to get rich i just want to own a piece of history, this is for personal pleasure not monetary 

    I get it about the appeal. I have a museum in my house; it's the size of a typical 3-ring notebook, because that's what it is. It contains coins up to twenty-five centuries old. However, given how many people show up here waving parking lot coins they think represent their early retirement, it's necessary to make clear that the money angle is rarely feasible. Glad we got that out of the way.

    As for Romans, "anything before 476" is still a very broad era. I would further divide it:

    • Republic (280-27 BCE)
    • Suetonian (27 BCE-96 CE)
    • Pax Romana (96-192 CE)
    • Barracks Era (192-284 CE)
    • Fourth Century (284-410 CE)
    • Western Downfall (410-476 CE)
    • Provincial (roughly the Western Imperial times; this is where the Greek alphabet comes into play, so start studying)

    Obviously, the names do not directly correspond to actual eras. They represent eras of numismatic styles. The knowledge applicable to a given coin somewhat transfers to others of that era. Put another way, if you're a stud with Republic denarii, that doesn't mean jack for Barracks Era billon antoniniani. (Get ready to learn a whole new vocabulary. Billon means debased silver; essentially copper with a sprinkling of silver in some form. It's what emperors did when they had spent the treasury broke.)

    For the budget collector (and of great use even for people willing to spend a bunch of money for out-of-print references) one begins with Wildwinds. If you really get into it, and are ready to start spending money, begin with Rasiel Suárez's Aorta. Try and snag one for two figures. This is the most concentrated Roman imperial reference available. Have magnification. If you really really love this, or if it's actually less expensive (like right this moment), splurge instead for ERIC II. Unless you're a weightlifter, make sure you own a hand truck to move it around. Also by Ras, this is like Aorta but with color images, more comprehensive listings (a feat, considering Aorta's sheer density of information), easier reading (can get away with lighter mag), and continues until 1453 CE (Aorta stops the Eastern emperors just before Arcadius).

    If you love this stuff, you'll end up wanting the Sear references: volumes I-V plus Greek Imperial. Another useful item is the two-volume Coinage & History of the Roman Empire. When you recover from the heart attack you get looking at the price, start looking for a cheaper version. I'd say if you see the pair for <$100, consider pulling the trigger.

    The way we typically attribute ancients is by catalog numbers as well as descriptions. I've never seen anyone but me use Aorta catalog numbers, but they exist; same for ERIC II, which is like Aorta after a Hulklike transformation. Sear (S-nnn), Roman Imperial Coinage (RIC x, nnn), Sear Greek Imperial (SGI-nnn), and others exist. You won't have to dig through Wildwinds for long to see such attribution references.

    Once you get into this, you'll start to see that there about about five things to be found on a Roman coin of a given size/material/weight/denomination: obverse device, obverse legend, reverse device, reverse legend, and exergue/fields. The exergue is the bottom reverse, typically the home of mint marks, but fields also matter. For example, a ghamma or thelta (you call them gamma and delta, but that's how they are pronounced in demotic Greek) oficina (sub-mint) mark in the field relates more to the exergue than to the reverse device or legend. Learn to look for and quantify those five things, and in combination with denomination, you have an attribution.

    All that either gets you excited/motivated and you blew out of here early to go look at Wildwinds, or it scares f-bomb out of you and you no longer want to do this. There isn't usually middle ground. If the former, keep asking. If the latter, I get it. There's a reason antiquarians aren't as common as roll hunters and Morgan junkies.

  5. On 3/16/2024 at 10:29 AM, Kinlar said:

    Hey all, I'm brand new to this. Looking to start collecting ancient Roman coins. I have no clue where to even start, any guidance would be much appreciated. 

    Okay. Roman coins span eight hundred years or thereabouts and that's not counting the extra thousand years of Byzantines speaking Greek and calling themselves Roman.

    What timeframe do you want to collect, and what types?

    Do you know much about Roman history and numismatics?

    Do you have any of the accepted references, and if not, would you like suggestions?

    How's your familiarity with the Greek alphabet? Other alphabets you read?

    Are you interested in any other ancients that aren't Roman?

    Have you yet bought any, and if so, would you like to learn good methods of attribution?

    Do you accept that you aren't going to get rich at this? (Most of the US collecting newbies do not, until they get the Ice Bath of Reality. I'd expect better from even a budding antiquarian.)

    The good news for you is that antiquarians have a way of being the most pleasant numismatists and historians you're likely to meet. Those of us who have been at it a while take pride in that. Ask away.

    That'll do for now as food for thought.

  6. On 3/11/2024 at 5:33 AM, double ddo said:

    If that's truly the case, I don't see how it was platted, I got it out of a tin box that I bought from an elderly woman that was full of pennies. This coin an several others in that box were wrapped in a paper towel an sealed in a zip lock bag. The lady didn't plate it for sure and I'll be nice, I darn sure didn't plate it. Your reply has no depth an offers nothing that would lead me in the right direction. You tried, thank you

    It's certainly plated. As for the rest of what you say here, it doesn't even demonstrate notable critical thinking efforts. I can think of no reason anyone would bother to lead you in the right direction after that.

  7. On 3/5/2024 at 3:29 PM, VasquezJ said:

    Has completely full luster and looks like it was ways never circulated. Maybe not quite a MS 70 but I think a grade right under that. 

    If you know the grading standards for 69 and 70, then why are you asking anyone else for their opinion? Send it in so that it can get real quiet around here.

  8. On 3/5/2024 at 2:35 AM, VasquezJ said:

    Im positive its that coin sent it to NGC to get graded since last Wednesday and arrived on Thursday 9:14 am and submission was done for a 3 day turn around Walkthrough and over a week and a half later and status is still sitting on Received but was told I would receive coin back before the end of this week. Every minute that goes by feels like a week seriously but hopefully the grading process start today and get my coin before the end of this week. 

    Well, when it comes back bagged, consider that your first tuition. As long as the otherwise wasted money buys you some knowledge, it wasn't a total loss.

  9. On 3/4/2024 at 1:23 AM, TedHartwell said:

    Thank you both for your responses and also for the suggestions about including sizes and cropping future photos.  This one is definitely dime-sized and fits the 18.8 mm approximate size you mentioned.

    That makes sense because the date's font size is more consistent with Capped bust dimes than with the larger denomination. I would grade if FA-2, myself, but either way the wear is too heavy for it to have much value.