• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

JKK

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    3,800
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    52

Posts posted by JKK

  1. 1 hour ago, KarenHolcomb said:

    Oh Spoon!!! Lol! I don't think he could have been one of the ruddiepoos, but who knows! We all love ya, Condor. I think???

    What he seems too polite to tell you is that he has not misspelled 'Condor.' His name does not refer to the enormous scavenging birds of California and the Andes. 'Conder' refers to a type of British 1800s tokens popular with some collectors. I don't collect them myself, but I have a sneaking suspicion he does. Anyway, you might consider adjusting your spelling going forward.

  2. The photo that says the most, to me, is the very last one edge on. I see one side, the obverse I think, ballooning up much larger than I've ever seen a device naturally sticking up. I try to figure out how it could possibly have gotten that way. It's like someone hit the reverse very hard with the round part of a ball-peen hammer, deforming it. Yet I don't see the effects of that on the reverse that I would expect. So I do not know what to make of it, but that deformity combined with other factors makes me very edgy. One of those factors is the too-perfect circle/strike/planchet; that can happen in ancients, but it is very rare. The other is that the overall look is consistent with known counterfeits, and Alex's silver coins are targets for the counterfeiters.

    I can't say for sure it's bogus. I can say for sure I wouldn't take a chance on it.

  3. Nice coins, TetonJoe. If you're in the Teton Valley, too bad I'm not going up there with my wife to visit our niece in Idaho Falls--I'd swing by and lug my ancients reference library. I'd be stuck there for a week with nothing to do but endure my sister-in-law, and nothing would be more of a save than burying my head in ancient coins for as much of that period as possible.

    You have coins of more than nominal value there. Nice Domitian denarii, like that one, can be in the $40-80 range. I'm betting the drachm, if that's the correct denomination, is in that range. The L. Julius silver, likely more. Claudius As (yes, that was a real denomination), same neck of the woods. If I owned what you pictured, and someone offered me $250 for the lot, knowing no more than I do right now, I would turn it down. If they offered me $500, though, I'd have to give it some thought.

    If your goal is to sell them, then you need them appraised so that your idea of fair value coincides with the market. If you want to keep them, great--take good care of them. If they are in their original flips, you'll want to put them in modern flips to protect them from PVC, but don't throw away the old ones--hang onto them for the information and make sure you can connect the old flips to their successors. I don't know how much most ancients gurus would charge to appraise them, but I think it would be less than their value.

    I can understand not wanting to leave them with anyone. However, that makes appraisal problematic. I suggest that you develop trust and respect for someone you can become safe leaving them with. If you want to PM me, I can perhaps name some names and make suggestions.

  4. 58 minutes ago, TetonJoe said:

    Could anyone provide some direction in getting a small collection of ancient coins valued?

    We have about 70 in original cards that were passed down from a long-time collector/family member.

    Thank you.

    Short answer: it's difficult.

    Are they all identified by catalog numbers? Do you know whether they are Roman, Greek, other; silver, gold, bronze, etc.? Those are important factors.

    I think you mean that they are in flips (with clear plastic set in cardboard) and that they still have written on the cardboard whatever was on there when bought. If so, that's where you'd look for catalog numbers. You could always post one; if you do, please post close-up front and back images including everything that's on the flip. Weight and diameter are also helpful. (I know that the flip has mass. Just weigh it anyway. Flips usually weigh about 2g including staples.) Ideally you would post the one you think is nicest, the one you think is oldest, and the one you think is most representative overall. The idea here is to get a sense of the whole collection.

    You see, if they are all heavily worn late Roman bronzes of Constantine, or Constantius, or someone else whose coins we are drowning in, you would not want to spend a ton of money on that. But they might be Greek, or Roman Republic, or from gods know where else. If they were early Roman Empire pieces in nice shape, they might be worth a lot more.

    If you have a local dealer, that person may be able to provide appraisal. If the information on the flips is correct to catalog numbers, that will be much easier and thus not so expensive. If that information is incomplete or incorrect--and you'd be appalled how much of what is written on ancient coin flips is baloney--the dealer will have to research the correct identification. The dealer will probably charge for that, and that's no guarantee the dealer will be correct.

    None of the local dealers in my area (Portland, OR) have the knowledge to do a quick and reliable job on ancients. Our club's ancients expert, who is my mentor, can do so. I can as well, though it will take me longer because I haven't seen as many coins as L has. I know there are at least a few other ancients gurus in this area, and Portland has about three million people, so that may help you take a guess at the likelihood of local expertise in your area.

    I hope to see your pictures, and then we can perhaps better assist.

  5. 4 hours ago, Adventureneverstops said:

    Hello everyone, I  have question, a guy that i know i saying that one of his friends has a 1804 dollar and its worth alots of money. So he asked me if I can find out how much its worth? 

    I personally don't know where that person got that dollar from?

    My question is I i post the picture of that dollar here and some how its no a legit dollar or maybe stolen. Am I legally responsible for that or do any authorities come after me? Or it's safe here on ngccoin to post picture? Please i need advice i don't wanna do somebody a favor and get in trouble on the other hand.

    First of all, the odds are astronomical against it being genuine. Smart money says assume it's fake until proven real. So my initial guess is that it won't be worth $1, and that no effort expended on it is worth your time.

    I don't think anyone here is likely to be able to give you legal advice. However, if you have reason to believe that the coin is stolen or counterfeited, especially if you are enabling these guys to entertain the fantasy that it's real, then surely you are concerned enough to contact the authorities and see if it also concerns them.

  6. Consider this: it is easier for corrosion to wear off a coin in circulation than for metal to wear off, at least in most cases. So if some of the coin's surface metal reacted with the environment to produce a softer material, and that material wore off somewhat, it could indeed result in a net loss of weight. From the photographs, the corrosion seems to have advanced to what we'd call pitting, so that would mean extensive reaction.

  7. 2 hours ago, KarenHolcomb said:

    I think it was but they are all a blur so I shall look anyway. I still have faith sensei. I do hope I spelled that correctly.

    Well, i hadn't looked there yet and it will make for an educational read, but did not answer my question. Although it did remind me that UVC is universal variety code and DMR is Die Marriage Registry. But doesn't cover the numbers that follow the letters. Idk? My head is pretty worn out about now so Ima stop for tonight. I REALLY need to hurry up and get a microscope. Shew!.

    A die marriage registry, I believe, would mean a listing of known obverse and reverse dies, and which were ever used together. With older US coins, for example, the number of dies can be quite finite. I have a 1794 cent that is from an obverse die that developed a crack diagonally through the 4 in the date. Through such tiny cues, we can decide exactly which obverse die that is, and then which reverse dies were used with it (and of course, from that, the die state...for example, my cent is a medium die state; if the crack were longer, I think that means late die state). I would assume that the number is an identifier of one particular die marriage.

    If UVC is universal variety code, that would probably mean a unique numeric identifier of a catalogued variety. Some glorious, devoted enthusiasts probably set out to compile a definitive catalogue of varieties, and this is the designator for this particular variation.

  8. For ancients, my resources are:

    Aorta by Rasiel Suarez. For Roman coinage, the indispensable tool that enables me to take what I can read and use it to figure out what I can't. Incredible work. If I had to get rid of all but one book, this is the most concentrated value, so it would stay.

    This is where I got my BORTE identification rubric: bust, obverse legend, reverse legend, type (reverse), exergue/fields. Once I satisfy myself that this coin is an AE4 (for example) of Cornholius with obverse legend 24) and reverse legend 97), with ASIRM in exergue, I know that my coin is under Cornholius's AE4s and I can ignore anything that doesn't have all three of those markers. That may narrow me down to about five coins, and I can then match up the other variables. Pretty soon I know exactly what I have. Suarez isn't exhaustive (no one is, that I know of), but he is as near exhaustive as my budget can obtain. His only fault, from my standpoint, is that later Eastern emperors are considered Byzantine and thus beyond the scope (thus, no Arcadius). I'll pardon him that for the sake of the many, many other Roman coins where he's enabled me to reach into the middle of all that information and say exactly what I've got. I take a little pad, write vertically B O R T E, fill in what I know or think, then start looking--if need be, using Bruck or Van Meter or even Sear to help me along.

    Late Roman Bronze Coinage by Guido Bruck. Helps me to make sense of what I'm seeing, and narrow down where in Aorta to look.

    The Handbook of Roman Imperial Coins by David Van Meter. Like Bruck, rarely the destination but often lights the pathway.

    All the David R. Sear books, including Byzantine and Greek Imperial. I wanted these, and spent the shocking sums for them, so that I would be able to give a positive recognized ID to most Mediterranean ancients.

    Classical Deception by Wayne G. Sayles. A great description of how ancient coins were minted, and how they were and are faked.

    Wildwinds. Not a book, but an excellent site with many examples, photos, and descriptions. Unlike all the rest, it's legend-searchable and exergue-searchable.