cobymordet

Hi and welcome. Unfortunately, all coins you posted are of the large variety. There was a "copper" LARGE 82d at 3.11g and a "zinc" LARGE 82d at 2.6g (or around that). The small date will look noticeably smaller. LARGE: SMALL: . Focus on the distance of the 2 from the rim.

So, is it God or the Devil in the details?...Maybe just dimensions. Measure twice, cut once.

Always, but sadly I gravitate to broken toys. Funny enough, I had no idea this coin existed about two weeks ago. I like that I learn something new every day.

Henri, methinks you doth protest too much sir. Don't worry about it. I will probably purchase this set eventually. . .or you can for me. . . That way, I can learn to dot dot dash dash dot dash dash dot dot dot ._.. _ _ _ ._..

groovy, thanks!

I'm looking at this coin and I cannot tell whether or not if the impacted areas are legitimate?

I like it! The doubling is clear and the damage is not as much of a distraction as I figured it should be.

(System Of A) DOWN with "da MAN"!

Hey Captain Murder, where is Sargent Slaughter?

The coin is from my fathers' collection and he is selling his stuff off. I doubt he would have any preference for a coin he probably got in change/roll. As far as getting it graded... Does the the coin look cleaned? Would the rot make it "environmental/details"? Which grading company will attribute it is "Far 2" And finally. . . what would you all imagine the best grade it would get? PS: If I go the graded route, I will then have to ask a ton of other questions

That is awesome! It looks like a VF level grade, I don't think it has enough detail for EF. Would it be worth grading?

Close-up with line

I seem to have a depth-perception problem. I was running through some foreign coins and found this 1932 5iver. I copied the description graphic below from the Saskatoon Coin Club. Any thoughts?

Higher quality pics: