GBrad

Great post and question TNN! I too like the thoughts and opinions on this topic of "future rarity". I learned something here as well. Thanks for the post.

Hello Lem. I'll chime in here. The lack of (or missing) design elements is simply the result of an over-polished die. If a Cent is missing the FG, it should also be missing the "roof supports" since they are some of the lowest relief design elements on a LMC. I personally have never seen a true No FG Cent that did not have a floating roof. https://www.ngccoin.com/variety-plus/united-states/cents/lincoln-cents-memorial-reverse-1959-2008/815229/?page=1

Hey JP. Just my humble newbie input here and I'm sure I will be corrected if I am wrong..... Feeder finger damage typically creates scratches or noticeable gouges on the reverse die which typically get worse over time as the face of the anvil die is continually scratched by an improperly aligned/functioning feeder finger. In 1992, the mint had not yet dedicated to inverting their dies (meaning the obverse die was the anvil die and the reverse die was the hammer die). The mint eventually, for the most part, switched to inverted dies several years later as well as switching to the German made Schuler press. I am not quite sure exactly what a feed finger design and its nomenclature looked like on the Bliss press which I am fairly certain was used in 1992 to strike your coin. I highly suspect the obverse/hammer die (regarding your coin) momentarily struck a malfunctioning feed finger stuck within the striking chamber while void of a planchet. This caused the damage to the obverse die that was in turn transferred to your coin and all other ensuing coins struck from the same damaged obverse die. There's no doubt the series of raised lines on your coin was caused by die damage. It think is a very cool example though and I like it! 👍

"Sorry folks, park is closed, the moose should have told you outside"....... Oh my!!!! That is iconic! Great movie. (Sorry to go off topic here, my apologies, I just could not resist)

Gorgeous. Granted I have not been around the forum much lately, but when did you switch to copper????? I guess you finally acquired all of the best Jeffersons on the planet and now you've started on Lincolns.....

I deleted my original comment out of respect to the author even though I had no intent to be disrespectful by simply saying, "Maybe that should be a hint". It was meant to be a joke, but I can now see how it also could be construed as being a smart remark. What @JKK said later down this thread, I believe, could not be more correct, nor well written. Thank you for bringing up that point JKK.👌

Never hurts to ask.

Sorry, couldn't resist JKK...... all in fun my friend. (**Please don't blackball me**)

Hey Roger, you need a profile pic on Amazon!! Got any free vouchers?? Times are tough and money is tight these days.......😁

Ya know.... while nothing is impossible (I try to be optimistic as in "my glass is half full"), it is kinda like @J P M said, "Well the odds are astronomical". I think that pretty much sums it up here due to the simple fact that over 6 BILLION 1982-D LMC's were struck which accounts for both large and small dates combined. However, if... just if.... the author hit the lottery here (which I am going to be very skeptical about until spot on weights are posted and if weight is correct, then on to is it actually a legit minted coin, no offense OP) those rings of death would be absolutely typical of my type of luck....😆

Can you please supply a good clear picture of the reverse? Obviously, you know enough about this date and mint mark to have posted this particular coin, on a scale. By the looks of the mint mark with what appears to be zinc rot, and the top of the ear displaying a different color, I'm not convinced this is a copper cent. Also, please make sure your scale is properly calibrated. Thanks!

Who doesn't like Braveheart!!!!! My newest addition.

Hello @J P M. There's a lot of DDO and some DDR varieties for this date. Look very closely my friend as some of the doubling is very hard to see. Very nice coin too!!!

GOOD GRIEF MAN!!!! Where are my manners!!! I’m a southern boy and I completely dropped the ball on that one. I know better!! You are correct. 43, more like 33, it is!!👍

100% correct JP. That coin is beyond damaged and it would not matter even if it was a CAM. I just have this dream, pretty much more like a nightmare, every now and then about finding a fairly valuable coin and it looking like this one (the true side effects of being an error and variety collector). Bottom line here is this: It does not matter. Thanks for the comment my friend.

Thank goodness that joker wasn't a CAM, Phew.....!!!!! I "think" the A in STATES is centered (surely it's not favoring the right side T is it?) because you sure can't tell much by the way AM is damaged and the proximity of FG is hard to tell for me as well with the building corner damaged as it is.

Well, I'll throw in my belated Happy B'day wishes too Karen!!! Now..... Ronnie my friend..... I know you and I are both getting older, correct me if I'm wrong because I was never very good in math to begin with....., but wouldn't Karen be 53? I'm really concerned that all the meds (legal that is) have affected my cognitive abilities to count, pal......😂

Been a minute or two since I posted, or even logged on here. Unfortunately, the first thing I see is a newb (referring to "that lil penny guy") getting an attitude and all smart mouthed at a seasoned coin collector trying to help out. I would urge you to lose the attitude, be much more respectful, and realize that none of the knowledgable veterans on this forum are getting paid, or receiving ANY benefits whatsoever, to help people out like yourself. We gladly donate our time to help others, but with attitudes such as yours, and so many that came before you, it really makes me wonder why we even try sometimes..... Good day.

If this coin you speak of has that much rot on it, and if it is affecting the AM, how can you tell it is close? There are numerous other diagnostics in which to validate a 1992 CAM (or any WAM as well) which can sometimes be more accurate than the AM itself. But..... as said numerous times already, we cannot help you without pictures.

Yup! Great eye there! I too see what you are talking about.

Very nice coin Bill! ZLincoln has confused me though.

Would be better to supply entire obverse and reverse pics for a question like this even though I'm not sure what benefit is gained by answering your question. I see the die chip, but.........

Absolutely Lem, I really appreciate the tag my friend. By no means am I saying this is not a DDO, it very well could be. I’m on my phone at the moment, waiting at the docs office…. what fun🙄…., and had a little more time to look at @CoffeeTime’s coin a little better. Wish I was on my laptop cause these phone pics get pixelated. The one thing I have noticed as a characteristic, or diagnostic if you will, of this year and mint DDO’s is the appearance of the E in WE. The bottom bar of the E seems to be noticeably lower in comparison to the bottom of the W than that of a non-variety for this year and mint. Just an observation I thought I’d throw out there. The E on the author’s coin does appear to have quite a bit of excess material on the bottom bar which is definitely consistent with the variety you mentioned. I say this regardless of the amount of potential circulation wear that this coin has seen simply due to what appearance to be an abundance of metal there. Best advice is to seek a good professional coin dealer versed in varieties and have them look at it. Best of luck cofeetime as I LOVE ME SOME GOOD OL’ DOUBLED DIES!!!!!😁

Hey Lem. Thank you for the nice comment. I can see what looks like possible extra thickness in IGWT, but as QA said, it could very well just be some flattening from circulation. Just too difficult to make a call based on the pictures. The mint mark placement appears to be very close in its placement and orientation (maybe a bit low though) for the variety you mentioned, but still too difficult of call to make. Regardless, that is one nice find in the wild!!

I'm still into CRH'ing, just can't give it up. I found this one today and decided to throw it up here on the forum for some new content. I actually found one of these same varieties about a month ago in a bank roll. Variety Vista is the only site that lists it. At first, I was somewhat skeptical with the first one I found. Even though it has been attributed, I was still on the fence if this was just an issue of minor MD even though it did not have the infamous shelf-like appearance. There are other hub doubling characteristics other than the 60 of the date, notably the downward curves/serifs on the top of the T's in the motto that show notching as well as the tops of the U in TRUST. Now that I found an identical example, my mind is made up that this is a legit DDO even though it is extremely minor. This one here is in pretty darn good shape considering its age. The dings are a true shame, but beggars can't be choosers I suppose. 1960 Jefferson's were some rough struck coins to say the least. There has not been one single FS designation found, or at least submitted, for this year and mint according to both major TPG's. There's still a joy to be had when finding any doubled die in the wild. I just wanted to post this one, even though it is not recognized by any TPG, for all the newcomers to the hobby to see that hub doubling will not always jump out at you such as the famous 1955, 1958 or 1969-S Lincoln doubled dies do. Patience, and knowledge, are both necessities to find the smallest of doubled dies such as this. And yes.... I know there's a friend of mine here on the forum that will be rolling his eyes if he reads this post and the mere fact that I would even take the time to look for things so minor 😆. But hey, I enjoy it. Quiet time and solitude is good for the mind and soul.