-
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
-
Posts
4,084 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Reputation Activity
-
Greenstang got a reaction from Coinbuf in 1969 s double die
That is Machine Doubling.
Terminology correction: The correct term is Doubled Die
-
Greenstang got a reaction from JT2 in 1969 s double die
That is Machine Doubling.
Terminology correction: The correct term is Doubled Die
-
Greenstang got a reaction from JT2 in 1991 D Lincoln Cent that is missing the L in LIBERTY
Not really although someone might give you a small premium if they collect these.
Minor greasers are just too common to be worth much over face value.
-
Greenstang got a reaction from RonnieR131 in 1982 US Quarter error
I'm gettin better! 😊
Glad to see that you are willing to learn and not just rely on everyone else to do the work for you. This hobby is a lot more fun when you can identify some of the many forms of damage and errors for yourself. Keep on replying to the different questions, it is a good way to teach yourself. State what you thing the right answer is, if your right, great, if your wrong, (and don't worry about being wrong, everyone is once in a while) you will learn the correct answer for the next time.
-
Greenstang got a reaction from JT2 in 1970 s Penny Possible DDO?
Welcome to the forum
That is Die Deterioration Doubling caused by a worn die. Value 1 cent.
-
Greenstang got a reaction from GBrad in 1961 D UN Penny
If the fingerprint is fresh, an acetone soaking would probably remove it. If it has been on there for awhile,there is nothing that can be done.
-
Greenstang got a reaction from RonnieR131 in Thought I'd share a pretty neat 1979 Jefferson I found CRH'ing
Thanks for the article Greg.
At least you know you have a one of a kind error. Good find.
-
Greenstang got a reaction from Tysen Burtis in Flawed dime. Curious about the cause and also the value
Welcome to the forum
It is not flawed, it has been intentionally routed out by someone possibly to be used in jewellry. There is a member of another forum who custom makes these coins to be used in bracelets.
-
Greenstang got a reaction from SlickCoins in Flawed dime. Curious about the cause and also the value
Welcome to the forum
It is not flawed, it has been intentionally routed out by someone possibly to be used in jewellry. There is a member of another forum who custom makes these coins to be used in bracelets.
-
Greenstang got a reaction from JT2 in Flawed dime. Curious about the cause and also the value
Welcome to the forum
It is not flawed, it has been intentionally routed out by someone possibly to be used in jewellry. There is a member of another forum who custom makes these coins to be used in bracelets.
-
Greenstang got a reaction from GBrad in Thought I'd share a pretty neat 1979 Jefferson I found CRH'ing
Thanks for the article Greg.
At least you know you have a one of a kind error. Good find.
-
Greenstang got a reaction from GBrad in Thought I'd share a pretty neat 1979 Jefferson I found CRH'ing
Mike Diamond is the senior editor & author of the error- ref.com website so if anyone can figure out what is going on with your coin, it would be him. Personally I have no explanation.
-
Greenstang got a reaction from GoldFinger1969 in New Coin Collector
Welcome to the Forum
Both those coins were graded by what is known as a "basement slabber", not one of the recognised TPG's so you can't put too much trust in the grades.
Unless both those coins would grade a high MS, it would cost way more to grade than what they are worth.
-
Greenstang got a reaction from Woods020 in 1992D Lincoln cent CAM /DDO
What you have is a WAM with Die Deterioration.l
Certainly not worth sending in as there is nothing to authenticate
-
Greenstang got a reaction from JT2 in 1992D Lincoln cent CAM /DDO
What you have is a WAM with Die Deterioration.l
Certainly not worth sending in as there is nothing to authenticate
-
Greenstang got a reaction from J P M in 1878 s Morgan
Wow
That has been heavily cleaned. Must have used SOS.
-
Greenstang got a reaction from Familyman0327 in 1878 s Morgan
Wow
That has been heavily cleaned. Must have used SOS.
-
Greenstang got a reaction from Coinbuf in 1974 quarter, possible error
Just a damaged quarter. It is impossible for another number to appear during the striking of the coin.
-
Greenstang got a reaction from Alex in PA. in 1974 quarter, possible error
Just a damaged quarter. It is impossible for another number to appear during the striking of the coin.
-
Greenstang got a reaction from JT2 in 1974 quarter, possible error
Just a damaged quarter. It is impossible for another number to appear during the striking of the coin.
-
Greenstang got a reaction from Coinbuf in New Coin Collector
Welcome to the Forum
Both those coins were graded by what is known as a "basement slabber", not one of the recognised TPG's so you can't put too much trust in the grades.
Unless both those coins would grade a high MS, it would cost way more to grade than what they are worth.
-
Greenstang got a reaction from Oldhoopster in New Coin Collector
Welcome to the Forum
Both those coins were graded by what is known as a "basement slabber", not one of the recognised TPG's so you can't put too much trust in the grades.
Unless both those coins would grade a high MS, it would cost way more to grade than what they are worth.
-
Greenstang got a reaction from tj96 in Did I make a big mistake??
I just checked all ten of your previous posts and I don’t see where you posted an error coin.
Please explain what coin you enquired about.
-
-
Greenstang got a reaction from James Zyskowski in Blank Nickel, bad planchette?
Looks like it may be a Nickel blank that has some damage.