• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Alex in PA.

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    2,763
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Posts posted by Alex in PA.

  1. 4 hours ago, Quintus Arrius said:

    You are right on point with your facts, Alex

    Thank you very much.  I personally have one rule that I have lived by for many years.  If the coin is Silver I send it to PCGS.  If the coin is Gold I send it to NGC.  This is my opinion and only my opinion.  I can find no fault in our Host's treatment of the Gold coins i have sent them.  I am also a fan of NCS Conservation Services as I had three CC Gold $20 conserved by them.  All came back looking great and one, an 1875, bumped up a grade.  One day you will have to explain this Rooster fascination and just what they are.  

  2. On 25 March 2004 gmarguli said:  I believe it still holds true today.

    NGC is slightly looser above MS65, but I believe that is a good thing. With PCGS you have a grade distribution like this:

     

    MS66: 131

    MS67: 52

    MS68: 0

     

    With NGC it is frequently:

    MS66: 127

    MS67: 43

    MS68: 7

     

    Some people point to this as NCG being looser or PCGS be more conservative. I believe it shows that NGC is being more accurate in its grading. With PCGS they have lumped a bunch of coins into one top grade. Perhaps all those coins do technically grade MS67. However, the marketplace values the higher quality examples more than the lower quality examples. With PCGS you have to take the dealers word or know how to grade them. With NGC they have put the top few "possibly technically MS67", yet superb for the grade coins into a higher grade slab to separate them from the rest. Basically, they have helped rank the quality of the coins. PCGS has taken MS66.8-to-MS68.2 coins and put them in MS67 slabs. NGC has taken the MS67.8+ coins and put them in MS68 slabs.

  3. 28 minutes ago, Coinbuf said:

    lots of coins worth less have been graded so its more of a personal choice than a value choice.

    Yes, how very true.  And Hoghead515, if you watched Mr. Lange's presentation you will know some coins that you can barely recognize turned out to be 1 and 2 of a variety kind.  

  4. 1 hour ago, GoldFinger1969 said:

    Some people don't like that CAC is sort of a 2nd TPG....grading the grader, in effect.

    Yes, correct.  And this theory has, over the years, caused people to no longer trust the TPGs.  If I cannot trust the grade of my coin assigned by NGC that means I MUST send it to CAC.  And if it fails to CAC a now educated collector will no longer send his/her coins to the TPGs.  I believe we're seeing a resurrection of the Whitman album sales.

     

    Definition: grade inflation is the loosening of grading standards for the purpose of grading coins at a higher number on the 70 point ANA grading scale.  Numismatic News Dec 20 2010
     
  5. 1 hour ago, GoldFinger1969 said:

    It's definintely irksome to some collectors here, too. 

    Yes, I am sure it is.  I would love to know if my 1860 D $2.5  in NGC AU 53 has been there.  However, after all this time I have come to the conclusion Mr. Albanese is running his company his way.

    We are only spectators in this game.

  6. 12 hours ago, dollarfan said:

    does ngc and pcgs care enough about this type of scenario to do something? 

    I'm sorry 'dollarfan'; I really don't know the answer to that.  The problem is, with this 'crime', there are no consequences.  I have literally read hundreds of threads on this over the years.  I firmly believe, the only people who truly care are:  men and women like you.  The only course, unless a really large counterfeit operation, is for us to pester EBay, et al, enough to get the ad pulled.  Again, I am very sorry I haven't an good answer for you.