• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

gmarguli

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    17,367
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by gmarguli

  1. On 10/10/2021 at 1:38 PM, Coinbuf said:

    I have not followed these that closely Lem, but are these not all being produced at the same location vs individual mints as in the 1800's.   If so then the quality should be fairly uniform across the entire mintage.

    The S, D, & P Morgans and the Peace are being minted at their respective mints. The CC & O are being minted at Philadelphia since those mints no longer have working equipment. 

  2. There were replicas make of internment camp tokens for other countries, so I assume they were made for Australia also. Based on the pictures, yours looks OK and appears to be uncirculated with some corrosion. Probably a $10-$20 coin if authentic.

    Red unc examples are selling for around $100. Given the frequency these are currently appearing on the market, I suspect a hoard of them is being dispersed right now.

  3. On 10/1/2021 at 5:00 PM, Jerry Picker said:

     I guess us old timers and serious collectors are behind the times. We never thought of altering coins to make a profit. We take the coins as they are, which we think look fine. Pretty soon all you'll see are all blue-brown coins in plastic holders. It's a shame.

     

    Speaking of ethics, isn't your stance on this kind of hypocritical:

     

    ethics01.thumb.jpg.f24cb344f86ad6c77426f527d30ddff9.jpg

     

    ethics02.jpg.3c6b5ed14ca4b1637fb2b8559b921641.jpg

     

    So, you will sell coins to a person who is knowingly "altering" and "enhancing" coins as long as they will pay the asking price? I guess capitalism is good for you, but not for others. (shrug)

  4. On 9/17/2021 at 12:58 PM, MarkFeld said:

    Greg, do you have the provenance removed just for coins you’re keeping for your collection or for the ones you’re reselling too? I can understand you not liking them, but paying to have them removed sounds a bit extreme. Do they really bother you that much?

    Just for the ones in my collection and only what I consider the useless provenances. I'd never remove something like Eliasberg or even something more specialized, like Rhodes for Tibet coins. I will remove "Big Mike Collection" that no one knows who it is or anything that was put together by going into the marketplace and buying a high grade set over a short period of time. I have zero respect as collectors for these people. 

    I also view many of the provenances as participation trophies. Hey, your set is the 5th highest on the registry and only missing the 3 key dates. It's eligible for a provenance on the inserts. :sick:

  5. On 9/17/2021 at 9:12 AM, numisport said:

    TPG's I demand you stop giving MS grades to older coins unless they truly are friction free. Whether MS or Proof you have hundreds and maybe thousands of overgraded coins with rub or 'cabinet friction'. This has been going on since the advent of third party grading. What say you CAC ?

    Coins can still be uncirculated with cabinet friction. Just like coins can be uncirculated while having been in circulation. 

    And while we're demanding things of the TPGs that will never happen:

    • TPG's I demand you stop listing provenance of meaningless collectors. No one knows who 99% of these people are. I'm tired of wasting money to remove the provenance from inserts. 
    • TPG's I demand you stop using special picture inserts for seemingly every different coin. I get that the Schlock  At Home people want it, but it degrades your image and credibility badly.