• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Alex in PA.

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    2,763
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Posts posted by Alex in PA.

  1. On 5/16/2022 at 6:59 PM, GoldFinger1969 said:

    note that the CAC designation seems to drive the price differential

    Here's where I agree with you but..........  It is not the ordinary, run of the mill collector that is causing this premium but the coin dealers and CAC itself.  However, CAC has been going for 12 (?) years now and doesn't look like it's going anywhere soon.  Whether you like CAC or not, if you are a coin collector, you will have to learn to live with it.

    What @Cat Bath said makes a lot of sense.

  2. On 5/27/2022 at 3:22 PM, J P Mashoke said:

    I am still on the fence about the whole MS + and - thing . Coin grading is tough enough without adding a variation to it.

    You are not alone.  Maybe I am old and old fashioned but for years I've been peeved at how the grading system has evolved.  Take for example the terms 'Proof Like', 'Deep Proof Like' and then 'Deep Mirror Proof Like'.  I feel if it isn't a Proof it isn't.  I believe that such terms are nothing more than 'Gradeflation' designed by dealers to line the pockets of dealers.  Just because the first few coins on a new run are pretty lets call them 'Proof Like' and get more money for them. The common collector won't know the difference.   It's a Mint State coin that looks good, has a certain eye appeal, that's all.  Sorry for the rant.

  3. On 11/12/2020 at 10:46 AM, GoldFinger1969 said:

    I've rarely seen it said that CAC stickers didn't belong,

    I've read a 'few' comments from ATS where some challenged the awarding of the CAC sticker to coins that appeared not to warrant it.

    On 11/12/2020 at 10:46 AM, GoldFinger1969 said:

    more so that a coin deserved one and didn't get it.

    There's some folks ATS that really get hyped up when they don't get the coveted 'bean'.  CAC has been here since 2007 and, whether I like it or not, doesn't seem to be going anywhere.

  4. On 5/26/2022 at 6:44 PM, GBrad said:

    (if found to be fraudulent) not only hurts numismatics and collectors,

    Absolutely and I recollect the folks ATS have had several counterfeit holders with real (but not the original) coins in them.  The people who do this counterfeit ae getting better by the day.  I remember when it was only coins and now it's the holders too.  I believe, but I'm not sure, one of those PCGS counterfeits was the holder, label, substitute coin, CAC sticker.  

     

    On 5/26/2022 at 6:44 PM, GBrad said:

    Maybe we are looking at a result of lighting and photography issues

    I may be wrongs, my memory is not what it used to be but I 'think' even a decade ago if you cracked an NGC holder something turned a different color.  Maybe someone from NGC could tell me whether I'm wrong about that.

  5. On 5/26/2022 at 7:02 PM, GoldFinger1969 said:

    Give an assist to CatBath who first posted about this. 

    I forgot; it wasn't intentional.  I've just got caught up in this excitement.  I do think reading about sunken treasure or buried treasure always exciting.  

     

    On 5/26/2022 at 7:02 PM, GoldFinger1969 said:

    Maybe Elon Musk can get the gold. xD

    Hey, doesn't he have plenty of money?  xD  But everybody loves gold.  There's just something about it.