Coinbuf

Congrats on your VAM set.   My registry set with the most views has just over 6,500 views, however, I never have bothered to track the number of views or try and break that down.   I started the set in 2011 so simple math says that is just over 500 views per year.

Why are you trying to compaire a circulation strike to a proof strike?

On 4/7/2024 at 1:31 AM, murder69 said:

What's the big negative aspect of every once and a while someone posts some really cool coin on any of the boards and anyone who see it can buy it? I personally would like to see examples of coins that I would be able to buy from Any of the Chatters on NGC. I personally am ALWAYS UP FOR ACQUIRING A NEW COIN. 

I would not expect someone of your obvious low character and equally low ethics/morals to understand the "big negative".

On 4/5/2024 at 12:32 PM, murder69 said:

I'm new... what's spam? I thought the point of this forum was to help newbies build their collections?

Spam is what sellers do when they shamelessly post their coins for sale disguised as something else.   And no this entire forum is not like FB or Insta for internet sellers to hawk their coins on every thread.   The marketplace section of the forum is where you can advertise, the rest of this forum is for education and general coin related conversation.

100% a bezel, it also looks like the obv rim of the bezel was slightly folded over, perhaps to better retain the coin or maybe just from use as a pendant.   The coin itself has no significant collector value in that condition, worth roughly $28-$30 for the silver, the bezel itself might also be silver.   Rather than damage the coin or the bezel it would be best to leave it as is.   Welcome to the forum.

Reported.

This is the NGC registry section of the forum, if you want to buy or sell please use the Marketplace section of the forum.

Looks like a normal close AM to me from your photos.   The initials are clearly that of a close AM.

On 4/4/2024 at 8:37 AM, Jason Abshier said:

No disrespect for John Albanese and graders he hires , but I never fully ever really embraced the CAC beans … problem I saw was common coins in common grades being Beaned with CAC sticker …. When you can buy a higher grades PCGS/NGC coin instead of wasting money on lower grades common dated CAC sticker coin …. Where I do agree with CAC sticker stuff is when it comes to higher end stuff that’s more harder to get on market among collectors … it would be interesting see how CACG would take off , all it needs is its cult followers and supporter to help boost the market  and demands (which is easy) sorta like PCGS dealers/kool-aid drinkers who thinks all their coins are better and worth more than any other grading company out there so in time yeah I think CACG will succeed 

Do you also have the same disdain for NGC and its graders for grading those common coins in common grades?   You do realize that CAC doesn't pick and choose what gets sent to them, just as NGC or PCGS doesn't choose to not grade common coins in common grades that get sent to them, right?

Zinc rot. spend it before it turns to zinc dust.

On 4/3/2024 at 8:09 AM, andythestacker said:

Hi its a uk company called chards got it arriving tomorrow buddy

What you have bought is a counterfeit, there were no silver eagles struck at the west point mint in 1986, sorry.

As greenstang wrote we would need to see photos of both sides to see the condition, photos should be cropped so that we see more of the coin than the background.   From only the obv photo you supplied your coin looks to be lightly circulated and not reprocessed.  Here is a screenshot of sales from the Great Collections archives, they have not auctioned any AU examples and only one circulated coin an XF several years ago.   But from this you can see there is not much price spread form that XF to a low MS example.   If you are planning to try and sell the coin raw I would guess a fair value would be around $75.   If you were to send this to NGC for certification and it was graded as AU58 it might fetch more as there is some demand for AU58 examples for the everyman registry sets.

Not initials, just damage to the coin while in circulation.

On 4/3/2024 at 7:45 AM, andythestacker said:

Hi all,new here today i have the above silver eagle with the W mint mark on it any information on it much appreciated 

thx

Andy

All ASE (American silver eagle) coins coined in 1986 were produced in the SF mint, there are no W minted coins from that year.   Are you sure you are not confusing the designers initials as a mintmark?

Edited to add: you posted an ad to buy, who is the seller?

On 3/31/2024 at 4:07 AM, Jason Abshier said:

Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder … wish you well hope you win it , I’m not familiar with this seller but this seller has 100% feedback after selling 27,000+ coins or whatever on that eBay account they have a return policy which is good deal not too many sellers willing to go that length with return policy

On 4/2/2024 at 12:22 PM, GoldFinger1969 said:

Return policy ?

This is part of how a convincing scam artist runs a good scam, you have to convince the mark that you are legit.   How better to look legit than to offer a generous return policy and work with ebay to remove any neutral or negative feedback so you keep your feedback score looking pristine.   The reason this seller offers such an outstanding return policy is because they know some of the coins they sell are going to be returned, this helps them to avoid or have ebay remove any negative feedback.

All I can say is that I've provided plenty of warning on this seller, anyone that buys from them deserves what they get.

Edited to add: @Jason Abshier looking at an ebay sellers feedback score is useless if you don't do some digging.   Here is a screenshot of Denver Coins Co feedback, take note of the 4 neutral ratings in the past 6 months, if those were not removed for the seller by ebay the score would be less than 100%.   Then take a close look at the bottom right of this screenshot, see the verbiage that says revised feedback and that number is 74.   That means that 74 buyers left something other than a positive feedback rating which they changed, why it was changed we do not know.

On 3/31/2024 at 6:52 AM, Mike Meenderink said:

Denver Coin Co $34.00 Graded MS 64 GV $70.00

While the original point of this thread is moot, I'm just trying to understand your shorthand.   Am I reading this correctly that you paid $34 for the coin raw?   And what is GV?   the NGC coin explorer shows the price guide at $60.

On 3/30/2024 at 11:05 PM, GoldFinger1969 said:

 

Nobody is getting animated about a coin being EF-40 or EF-45...it's the downgrade from MS to AU by CACG that is causing the friction (no pun intended  ).

Here is a timely thread on the PCGS forum that touches on the issue of gradeflation in low circulated grades.   I think that Bill's reply toward the end of the thread is the most correct with regards to the coin in question and how it should have been graded.   And while we will never know in this case, I suspect that the grade analysis put forth by Bill would be a likely outcome had this been graded in say 1988 or thereabouts.

Linky

Not an error,  what we call a dryer coin.   Coins sometimes get stuck against the barrel of the dryer and scrape or sand off one side like this

On 3/30/2024 at 11:05 PM, GoldFinger1969 said:

Would you agree that the "market grading" slide for the most part has NOT been a change within MS or AU of 2-4 grade increments....but the JUMP from the AU to the MS bucket ? 

It's not the downgrade of 1 or even 2 increments that is leading to this polarized debate...it's the entire issue of MS vs. AU and the definition or tolerance for the slightest wear/friction/rub on the highest points of the coin.

Nobody is getting animated about a coin being EF-40 or EF-45...it's the downgrade from MS to AU by CACG that is causing the friction (no pun intended  ).

No I would not say that, back when the TPG's first setup operations MS65 was a very high grade, I wasn't into slabbed coins then but as I've been told getting an MS67 was almost unheard of.   Today MS67 is a very high grade but it is awarded far more frequently than back in the late 80's early 90's when the TPG's were just starting out.   And over the past 5ish years I have seen many coins that have been cracked and regraded 2 to even 4 MS grades higher than what the original grade was.   I'm not saying those new grades are incorrect or the old grades were correct, but we have seen high profile coins jumping grades with what to me is an alarming frequency.    The photo archives on the PCGS system were basically eliminated overnight several years ago because high profile customers of big dealers ((cough) like Legend (cough)) were complaining to Laura about seeing posts on the PCGS forum that involved regrades of their coins.

Gradeflation has touched every part of the grading scale, we are seeing coins that in the past would max out at VF30 now being graded as XF, even AU at times.   And yes the line between AU and MS has been blurred out of existence, market grading is not about using grading standards it is about pricing coins.   Today a grader looks at a coin and says what should this sell for, not what does this grade.   There is a reason why PCGS did away with its grading sets as grading sets are not needed under market grading, its noteworthy that CACG has grading sets that they expect their graders to use as a reference when grading.   Remember that most graders used to be dealers, so it stands to reason that if you put the foxes in the hen house the eggs may be tampered with.

Die cracks are a fun find and have developed a somewhat cult like following in the past few years during and after covid.   But that following is more interested in finding them and then selling not so much in buying them, so it's really a one way market and the buying group is a very small population of collectors which keeps the prices to just a bit over face value.

One more set of photos, these are also from the same thread that I quoted the text from above.   CC's photo, the buyers photo and the PCGS result.   Bottom line Mike if you have gotten every raw coin you bought from this seller to straight grade at the advertised grade you are either not being honest with us about your results or have been incredibly lucky.