• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

brg5658

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    4,254
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by brg5658

  1. Hello,

     

    I have only taken a "serious" interest in coin collecting since about 8 months ago, and my grading skills are not yet what I want them to be.

     

    Out of pure curiosity, can you help me out here - on the '65 Gulden, why does it look like the Queen's hair and ear has wear from circulation? Was it really struck like that, or is there actual wear? If it's the latter, how did it receive the mint state grade?

     

    Thanks a lot for helping out an old collector who only recently got serious!

     

    (By the way: amazing friggin' coin. I am a sucker for beautiful toning like that!)

     

    There is no wear on the coin. There are two other factors that may make it look like wear, but the coin in hand is fully lustrous and clearly uncirculated.

     

    First, the way the toning lays on the coin makes it appear as if some of the high spots have wear because they are untoned. This type of toning pattern is not all that uncommon, and has to do with the way that gases in the air circulate around the coin surfaces. The particular coin spent almost 50 years in a Meghrig World Coin album with a high sulfur content.

     

    Second, what looks like rub on the highest points of the coin is actually an incomplete strike. When a coin is not completely struck, the metal is not fully squeezed into the deepest parts of the die (the highest parts of the design). These areas will appear with the pre-struck planchet hits and dings, and they don't exhibit the metal flow lines and frosty luster of the metal that was struck at high pressure into the die.

     

    Close-up of obverse:

    1981050_Full_Obv.jpg

     

  2. I know it's not a US coin, but I wanted to show this medal off a little. I saw this nice medal come up for sale on eBay a few weeks ago, and I had to have it. It's a restrike, listed by NGC on the label as a "modern restrike" -- unfortunately, the privy mark/information I need to see to get an idea of how "modern" is on the edge, and not viewable in the NGC holder. Nonetheless, it has a nice aged patina to the surfaces, and attractive super-high-relief surfaces. If I had to guess, I'd say it is a restrike from sometime in the first half of the 20th Century.

     

    The medal commemorates The Battle of Borodino, which was the bloodiest and largest battle of the Napoleonic Wars.

     

    1812_Napoleon_BattleBorodino_NGC_MS64BN_Restrike_composite_zpsb58ce6c5.jpg

  3. I found a restrike of the Libertas Americana medal, minted in 1983 at the Paris Mint. It is 78-79mm diameter, 5mm thick, and weighs in at around a half-pound. I can't find much more information regarding mintage, etc. but I will keep looking. It is made of Bronze, and is by far the largest medal I own now.

     

    Notice that the obverse differs from the original medal with a modified date legend of "1783 3 SEPT. 1983". This medal was specifically struck to commemorate the 200th anniversary of the signing of the Treaty of Paris. The reverse bears the "4 JUIL. 1776" date in exergue, which on the original medal was beneath Miss Liberty on the obverse. I found these "modifications" to be quite interesting. I'm also adding a "size comparison" picture so you can see how big this is compared to a Lincoln Cent.

     

    1983_Libertas_Americana_Restrike_Large_Bronze_composite_zps0cbf6fe5.jpg

     

     

    1983_Libertas_Americana_Restrike_Large_Bronze_size_compare_zps5f501323.jpg