• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Just Bob

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    7,480
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    111

Everything posted by Just Bob

  1. Sorry, but that does not look like a mint error. Looks like an abused coin. Worth 25 cents, unless it gets rejected by a vending machine or Coinstar machine. In that instance, it is worth zip. Welcome to our happy little corner of the world
  2. I am not Coinbuf. I am Bob. You just "double dog dared" the wrong person. Go back and re-read this thread. I asked you what your point was in pointing out that this coin was minted in Denver. You still have not answered that question.
  3. I guess I am just dense, but I don't understand the point of this paragraph at all. In fact, this whole thread has me confused. I have no idea what you are trying to say.
  4. It does not appear to be, but you can compare it with the 10 known examples HERE
  5. You have the coin in hand. Does it look to have been circulated?
  6. It would be helpful to me if you would cite specific examples. What coins did you submit to NGC, only to have them returned as ineligible? What National Park and Smithsonian coins are you talking about? Which pieces from National, International, and Private mints? What "major grading and pricing guides" are you referring to?
  7. Were these impurities hard to refine out of the copper at that time?
  8. I did not try to find the ebay listing to see if it had better obverse pictures, but VAM-6 does appear to be the right choice.
  9. I have to agree with the others - the coin is not genuine.
  10. Welcome to the forum. If the doubling you are seeing is the bit from about 7:00 to 10:00 on the rim, that is just the result of slightly misaligned dies, and is not worth a premium. It is not the result of a doubled die.
  11. In addition to all of the other comments, I will add that it is impossible to determine an accurate grade of your coin by just a picture of the obverse.
  12. +1 You can't go wrong with any book by David Lange (DWLange) or Roger Burdette (RWB). Q. David Bowers has written a few good ones, too. Also, Kevin Flynn's series of reference books are helpful, if you like to hunt varieties.
  13. Yeah, my post was not very well thought out. Although the writer specifically asked about "five cent nickel coins" and "one cent pieces," I guess I assumed the reply was about the method used to clean all coins. So, is there any record of what was used to clean silver?
  14. Another dime with an interesting die clash.
  15. My chemistry is a little rusty, but I assume "aqua fortis" is commercial nitric acid, around 60 - 70%, and "pure nitric acid" is Fuming nitric acid, around 98-99%. But, doesn't silver dissolve in nitric acid? I though that was how Silver Nitrate and Silver Fulminate were made. And then they revolved them in a wheel (after wiping them dry) to "give them a little polish." Yikes!
  16. It is interesting to think that, had the work been done by the Medallic Art Company, instead of the US Mint, as per Mayor Thatcher's suggestion, this coin could possibly have faded into obscurity, and been known and collected by only a handful of people.
  17. This is just my opinion, but I would not send a '23 in for grading unless I thought it would get a 66 or higher. Again, just my opinion.
  18. Ben really has grown! He doesn't even look like the same boy.
  19. Those are gorgeous. Your Federal Union "BY" (223) is even nicer than the one from the Q. David Bowers collection.