• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Lem E

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    2,030
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    26

Reputation Activity

  1. Thanks
    Lem E reacted to VKurtB in Jefferson nickel steps Rev of 38 or 40. What do you see?   
    Looks like a Reverse of 1938 to me. I have one in MS66FS. (PCGS) Bernie Nagengast estimated the Denvers were about equal of each.
  2. Thanks
    Lem E reacted to The Neophyte Numismatist in Jefferson nickel steps Rev of 38 or 40. What do you see?   
    looks like a 38 to me.
  3. Thanks
    Lem E reacted to J P M in Jefferson nickel steps Rev of 38 or 40. What do you see?   
    It is tough to say for sure where I need to look is banged up and worn but I can still see the line on  the left and the one on the right is showing enough for me to say it is a 40 reverse . I went and looked at mine and even though It is banged up I can still see the steps better than this one I am going to say it is a 38 reverse labeled as a 40 reverse.
  4. Thanks
    Lem E reacted to EagleRJO in Jefferson nickel steps Rev of 38 or 40. What do you see?   
    I assume thats an MS graded nickel, so to me the less well defined steps, except on the far right side which is a little more defined, would indicate a 1939-S 5C Rev 38.
    [P.S.  I also see a slight curve in the steps drawing a box around that on LemE's nickel which is another indicator for a Rev 38, unless that is just an optical delusion.] 

  5. Thanks
    Lem E reacted to Sandon in Jefferson nickel steps Rev of 38 or 40. What do you see?   
    Although the strike makes this one a bit confusing, the steps appear to be lightly engraved and wavy, meaning that this is a Reverse of 1938 (Variety 1).  (According to the NGC Coin Explorer, nearly two-thirds of 1939-S nickels have the Reverse of '38, while most of the 1939 and 1939-D issues have the Reverse of '40.) 1939 S REV OF 38 5C MS | Coin Explorer | NGC (ngccoin.com).
       What does the NGC holder that contains the coin say its variety is?
  6. Thanks
    Lem E reacted to Greenstang in Jefferson nickel steps Rev of 38 or 40. What do you see?   
    Not much to go by but I would say that is a Variety 2.   
    I remember reading on another site that there were 25% of Variety 1 and 75% of Variety 2 minted in 1939
  7. Thanks
    Lem E reacted to Coinbuf in Jefferson nickel steps Rev of 38 or 40. What do you see?   
    38 rev is what I see.   But correct me if I'm wrong, shouldn't that only be on the 39-P?
  8. Like
    Lem E got a reaction from R__Rash in Post your most recent acquisition: US   
  9. Like
    Lem E got a reaction from robec1347 in For the love of silver   
  10. Like
    Lem E reacted to zadok in For the love of silver   
    ...hey boss, do u think we should change the dies pretty soon?....
  11. Like
    Lem E reacted to ldhair in For the love of silver   
  12. Like
    Lem E reacted to rrantique in For the love of silver   
  13. Like
    Lem E reacted to ldhair in The United States Botanic Garden Coinage And Currency   
    That's what I'm doing. A quick, proper dip could conserve them but getting them out of the packaging will distroy the packaging. 
  14. Haha
    Lem E got a reaction from The Neophyte Numismatist in Post your 5 cent pieces.   
    I sure have 
  15. Like
    Lem E got a reaction from powermad5000 in Post your 5 cent pieces.   
  16. Like
    Lem E got a reaction from rrantique in Post your 5 cent pieces.   
    I picked up this 47 D/D piece recently. This is the only RPM that NGC recognizes listed as VP-001. CONECA lists this as RPM-001. You can see the first impression peeking out of the bottom of the second punch with the second being punched slightly counterclockwise. According to Variety Vista there are 2 more RPMs listed for the Denver pieces from 1947. 

    According to the various variety sites this is also listed as a DDR. I am certainly no variety expert by any means and I have really looked this coin over. I did find the one die marker they show which is this very small die gouge. The rest of it I just don’t see. Sometimes I wonder how they come up with some of these. Guess that’s why I’m not much on this doubled die stuff. 

    Here are a few links.
    http://www.varietyvista.com/05 JN RPMs/1947DRPM001.htm
    https://www2.briansvarietycoins.com/listings/view/1595
    https://www.conecaonline.info/jefferson-nickel/jefferson-nickel-1947-d-rpm-001-denver/
     
  17. Haha
    Lem E got a reaction from Henri Charriere in Post your 5 cent pieces.   
    Congratulations to you for being that 700th post! I need to get some more coins to Joe for imaging.
  18. Thanks
    Lem E reacted to Henri Charriere in Post your 5 cent pieces.   
    Congratulations on your 700th post!  There are an awful lot of extraordinary examples posted here which cannot be easily accessed elsewhere.  And thanks to @Buffalo Head for the fine assist!  Great thread!  
  19. Thanks
    Lem E got a reaction from EagleRJO in Jefferson nickel steps Rev of 38 or 40. What do you see?   
    Yes it is graded MS-66 with no FS designation.
  20. Like
    Lem E reacted to Sandon in Post your 5 cent pieces.   
    I purchased this 1857-O Liberty Seated half dime that PCGS graded MS 66 (and to which CAC awarded a green sticker) at a local coin show last month. The dealer gave me a substantial discount from most list prices, but it was still, for me, a sizeable purchase. My own photos of it didn't do it justice, and I finally figured out how to resize the PCGS image so that I could post it here.

  21. Like
    Lem E reacted to J P M in I had to have it   
    Yes I have a 1951 And thanks Lem ,I will sleep better now .

  22. Haha
    Lem E got a reaction from J P M in I had to have it   
    Nice pick up J.P. I hope you can now rest easy with this being rectified. 😃
  23. Like
    Lem E reacted to J P M in I had to have it   
    Well the nicer looking replacement coin for my mislabeled 1964 D came in today and I am happy again . Nickels can be deceiving when grading but to not have a D mint mark on a labeled 1964 D was a little bothersome.  
    I will keep the old one. I do like the Omaha Bank Hoard Label on the 1964 P




  24. Like
    Lem E got a reaction from powermad5000 in Post your 5 cent pieces.   
    I picked up this 47 D/D piece recently. This is the only RPM that NGC recognizes listed as VP-001. CONECA lists this as RPM-001. You can see the first impression peeking out of the bottom of the second punch with the second being punched slightly counterclockwise. According to Variety Vista there are 2 more RPMs listed for the Denver pieces from 1947. 

    According to the various variety sites this is also listed as a DDR. I am certainly no variety expert by any means and I have really looked this coin over. I did find the one die marker they show which is this very small die gouge. The rest of it I just don’t see. Sometimes I wonder how they come up with some of these. Guess that’s why I’m not much on this doubled die stuff. 

    Here are a few links.
    http://www.varietyvista.com/05 JN RPMs/1947DRPM001.htm
    https://www2.briansvarietycoins.com/listings/view/1595
    https://www.conecaonline.info/jefferson-nickel/jefferson-nickel-1947-d-rpm-001-denver/
     
  25. Like
    Lem E got a reaction from Teddy R in Jefferson nickel steps Rev of 38 or 40. What do you see?   
    All 3 mints used both reverses on the 39 coins.