@Sandon:
Granted, I do not know the first thing about coins. My thought them morphs into... wait a minute, what purpose would publicizing something like this serve? I believe our @RWB, based on what he has weighed in on previously as regarding a somewhat related matter, would summarily declare there is no way to prove the assertions being made--First Type 2, Last Type 1--and consequently, would dismiss the whole kit and kaboodle. I am inclined to agree. After all, if I were the Mint employee, there at the moment of birth, what credence could anyone place in Q.A.'s specious, uncorroborated, undocumentable claim? I don't know about anyone else, but @RWB's line of reasoning is bold, but unassailable. Drawing on that alone, I have just saved myself, let's see now, $170,000.