-
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
-
Posts
6,904 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
16
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
NGC Journals
Gallery
Events
Store
Downloads
Posts posted by jgrinz
-
-
23 minutes ago, Greenstang said:
That is the normal 7 feather that appears on all Morgans (except some 1878's). Never heard of a six feather variety.
Me either :-)
It is a 7 - that little triangle, the last to the left, is considered a tailfeather
-
On 10/1/2019 at 2:55 PM, Conder101 said:
Well I've got 53 years worth in so far, how about you?
A true antique complete with varnish - :-)
I think he may have been mocking himself on that statement - Its the way I took it. Making fun of himself for not researching the question before asking.
I may be wrong
-
Looks like to me it may be kicked out as environmental damage obverse - Rim damage is a little more than I like to see
-
Large complete pictures of front and reverse of the coin would help identify and grade your coin - thanks for sharing
The "E_R" issue is a die crack/break with displaced field … May have a VAM attribution but need to see the whole coin
-
4 hours ago, Just Bob said:
Not only did I not cheat, I guessed using pictures viewed on a 7 inch tablet.
Honestly, it was just a lucky guess.
Took a big coin to unseat my 65 RED ...
-
-
1883 Proof
GUESS THE GRADE & thoughts on a CAMEO DESIG.
Smudge Is on holder on reverse.
-
Seeing as there were no coins minted in 194 TRIANGLE :-)
Its 1944 d
-
-
6 hours ago, VKurtB said:
Okay @Mason254, now you're just embarrassing yourself. I'm through with you. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS RUNNING ACROSS AN ULTRA RARITY JUST LYING AMONG OTHER PIECES. All you have here is a normal MS64-ish 1964 Kennedy Half. If I had a dime for every time some new collector talked himself into believing they have found some ultra-rarity, I'd be a dime specialist. Just look at the comments below that Coinweek article. EVERYBODY thinks they have one, and no one there actually does, and you @Mason254, have joined their ranks. Do you even KNOW what having a "sharp square rim" is? The one in your picture doesn't have it. This is why I say STOP IT! You're into YouTube misinformation territory here, pal. Your last three threads are about a small letter Flying Eagle that was NOT one, a "Cud Error" that was NOT one, and now this. Strike three, you're out!
We've got another dude with a 1966 dryer coin that's worth gazillions in HIS mind, and another who thinks he's got a 1958 silver nickel. All these guys are simply delusional.
Breathe … :-)
Oh yeah plus its been cleaned nastily
I rest
-
James Toliver rare coins is known for doctored pictures and descriptions -
Free 30 days returns so if you are attempting to grade it - send fast.
Good Luck
-
1 hour ago, VKurtB said:
I tremble in ill-concealed anticipation for your very first EVER serious question, R420coins. Until I read one, I consider you solely an Internet troll.
320 post and nothing of substance - dont waste your time
-
TRolls dont have friends
-
What you are seeing is just reflection.
Welcome aboard and what he said ^^^^^^^
-
13 hours ago, Conder101 said:
They rarely bodybag anymore, it would get a details designation.
Yeah mistaken term on my part - I have been around too long OR not enough :-)
-
It would get body bagged - Its definitely cleaned
-
I am not sure it is even a proof …
Close pictures of both sides please .
-
Not a dime its a 3 cent nickel
These will have no mint mark
- 75% copper
- 25% nickel
NICE FIND
-
Which old dime … different locations on different series.
-
I like it :-)
-
-
1909 P LINCOLN NO VDB 1C PCGS MS 65 RD MS65 RARE RED - FIRST YEAR OF ISSUE
All Items seen in my auctions page - I will take offers here - PM me
Forum members will get free shipping w/tracking
Thanks for looking
-
4 hours ago, DWLange said:
That's a very minor error that likely resulted from gas trapped within the copper-nickel alloy. When compressed by the dies it can form bubbles just under the surface.
While interesting this is not something that NGC would attribute as a mint error unless it is quite severe.
Thanks DW
-
I am looking to send a coin in for a review of grade and possibly a designation review.
Coin is here 1883 3cn NGC PF66 Cameo
Has/Does NGC label a "lamination error" on coins from this era.
How should I proceed if this is what I would like reviewed ??
Kind Regards
Mike
More coins from inheritance collection
in Newbie Coin Collecting Questions
Posted · Edited by jgrinz
First one if real ( Cannot tell from those pictures ) is supposed to be a
1903 G$1 LA Purchase, McKinley (Regular Strike) - Gold - Weight would be helpful to determine fake or not
Second as it says on the label is a 1888 Liberty Nickel - Looks to be real and Nice UNC/MS condition
1888 Liberty Head Nickel - About 10mil made Depending on condition may be worth Grading and slabbing