• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

FlyingAl

Member
  • Posts

    333
  • Joined

Posts posted by FlyingAl

  1. On 1/25/2023 at 5:44 PM, VKurtB said:

    This is one more way that coin photography is problematic. If it requires Photoshop in order to make it look like you want it, THAT’S A PROBLEM. 

    I could get the same look without any edits, it'd simply be lower resolution. Here's an example. The top one is the composite shot, with the coin in high resolution. The second is the regular shot with no edits other than a crop.

    mdQDUxRPBTl7L8j-ck1tw3lba8bnK3qxVCzkYbqeBNtSl6U5eew8BRB56d7eRPCtLOKus6h7HQGrXFTpyDndOCUM-FiQenAdvAwyUIoaVL-COMStDnfRfmQNjAr3QwZU06_H-gAe1kRcNFghgMlR70j1mMN1WDkB5OEDwbAn4yC_dokCYm4D8aYuTL6eOgsl1vtzzxgfsPmH1KrCQKP7FURW5P_lY7_aGTL52VqduaU8KvFEUgnhycIGUe_txXbJjJ1S4rjtsijIt6sg0EKSgx6qr6rmmg3dZZWIw0qGijF5sttIZCqvrvxC40XlXnhX5esj2X8AEnl2_MwLve7gRMiuS6dHgMtnM5IZIISZABFv1PLPl8RXTsxzeuOA

  2. On 1/24/2023 at 11:42 PM, GoldFinger1969 said:

    Is the Canon state-of-the-art and you had same resolution quality on both ?

    The more vibrant color (realistic, IMO) of the smartphone is clear....and the increased sharpness and detail seen in the smartphone pics is very clear to me.  Look at the details on the smartphone pic on the neclace, the headdress coming over the left ear, or the feathers.

    The Canon looks like VHS-quality or DVD-quality while the S22+ looks like a Blu-Ray or 4K.  xD

     

    On 1/25/2023 at 8:03 AM, bsshog40 said:

    Well my camera is a Canon Rebel T4i. That picture is off of my phone which I had to steal from a former post of mine somewhere.  Lol All my coin pics are on my computer, which was packed away the last year while we moved, sold house and just bought another house. We don't have wifi out here right now either. Not sure if that pic may have degraded a little during the process of originally posting it, later copying it to phone and now cropping and reposting. Lol

    I'm very confused why the Canon images appear so weird. Here are some pics I took with my Canon Rebel XTi (which is an inferior camera to yours based on specs) and these blow the phone images away. Your camera should have done the same.

    133449018_193950cPCGSPR65.thumb.jpg.18a5b38473435909557194d0dae43c48.jpg1207960477_19425cPR.thumb.jpg.2ee07b07b0ad0aa3d5d663cd88fa4dc9.jpg736971516_1942PR6415cNearCAM.thumb.jpg.b029f4a34a134d47e0d4f7a68a8ae605.jpg

  3. On 1/20/2023 at 5:45 PM, RWB said:

    RE: "Here's what I call a "maxed out" slab. There's not much room left for anything, at least keeping it to a size where it would be useful."

    There's a lot of available territory. Here's the same label with a few minor adjustments. Everything is organized, left-justified and not cluttered at all. Lots of white space.

    Image2.thumb.jpg.280af31ad0f93a899d8e1979b2a4ecea.jpg

    Fair enough. xD

  4. On 1/20/2023 at 3:01 PM, RWB said:

    There's lots of room on a body bag. The label might state "Relief coated to resemble natural frosting," or "Left wing tooled near tip to strengthen details."

    Sure, but what about a details slab? 

    There's not room to say AU Details - Cleaned on obverse from Y in LIBERTY down to base of bust.

    I'd suggest keeping the labels as is and adding the info to the Cert lookup page. Much more room and it stays with the coin.

  5. On 12/31/2022 at 2:05 PM, Hoghead515 said:

    Very cool study Al. I enjoyed that very much. I may bookmark it if you dont mind so I can come back for info when I need it. It will be very useful. Thank you for sharing. That is some excellent work. 

    Go ahead! I will be putting up the cents, nickels, and dimes when they are completed. It's a pretty labor intensive process, so it may take a while.

    When it is complete I hope someone will find a use for it!

  6. On 12/31/2022 at 9:32 AM, RWB said:

    Very nice!

    Did you notice changes in die markers during life of the same die pair?

    Is this the "Santos Politician" variety? I.e., weak personal trustworthiness, need for higher SPF sunscreen to protect from glare of truth, and watered-down local root beer?

    :roflmao:

    I did not notice any major changes of the die markers during later die states for the half dollars. The coins are large enough that the markers were generally prevalent enough and distinct enough to carry through the entire die life. 

    However, when going through every date/denomination to get the full list of die numbers needed for the entire study (31 (possibly 30) dies in the series produced cameo coins), I noticed that for something like the 1940 proof cent the die markers for one die pair are difficult to distinguish from another non-cameo die pair. They also wear as the dies wear. That's the only die pair that I really was struggling determining markers so far, but I imagine there are more. 

    On a side note, I did discover that it appears one 1942 cent cameo die pair accounts for almost 80% of the cameo coins. That's well over 100 coins. The die started producing DCAM coins for quite a bit (I estimate 10 such coins exist) and it appears it wore slowly enough to continue producing cameos for such a large amount. This is contradictory to the previously widespread speculation that a die would only produce 25-35 cameo coins (this die produced quadruple that).

  7. On 12/27/2022 at 9:44 AM, numisport said:

    Does this mean specialists would rather have old crusty holders with an old crusty hazy toned proof Walkers in Pf 68 ? 

    I prefer my clean deep mirrored Pf 67 coins in fresh new holders. Is it just me ?

    0050 1940 Walking Liberty NGC Pf 67.png

    Maybe, maybe not. I personally wouldn't see a difference in the OP coin and yours - except that yours might still turn due to the dip it received. I'm confident that the OP coin won't be turning. 

    Specialists often prefer something original like this:

    1424420424_194250c.thumb.jpg.cfb382f1ceec41ab0ebb6e5ad56f50bb.jpg

    If you want to call it crusty and hazy, go for it! I'll buy it for double a blast white coin in the same grade.

    Cameos are the exception, but they always are.

  8. On 12/26/2022 at 12:29 PM, numisport said:

    An old PCGS Pf 65 Walker is definately worth a reholder. If you spend the money for Registered postage you might consider sending it in raw. I don't think there is much to lose. You could find this coin stunning in a fresh holder. 1942 halves had more die pairs than other dates and yours looks like matched obverse/reverse earlier die strike.I always thought these haze free deep ones could get a grade bump and are definately worth more than cloudy pieces with ugly toning. 

    While the coin is attractive, specialists in this series actually prefer older holders. It shows the coin is stable. We also know that the coins are often under graded, and will pay a premium for the coins in the older holders to account for this. 

    While this coin does appear to have some frost, it is not nearly enough to consider a crack out for. It is probably in the two 20% of 1942 halves for frost, but only the top 2-3% or so actually get a premium. Coins like this aren't common, but they aren't super hard to find.

    IMO, I think the best course of action would be polishing up the old holder and leaving it as it is, saving the fees for a different coin.