Greenstang

I was just starting to reply when I saw that Coinbuf beat me to so I will just say that I agree with his statement.
An occulated gas bubble only occurs on solid-alloy coins such as  pre 1982 solid copper cents.

Very sad news. Although I never met him personally, I felt that I new him just by reading his informative posts and literature.
Rest in peace Dave, you will be missed by all.

Very sad news. Although I never met him personally, I felt that I new him just by reading his informative posts and literature.
Rest in peace Dave, you will be missed by all.

Very sad news. Although I never met him personally, I felt that I new him just by reading his informative posts and literature.
Rest in peace Dave, you will be missed by all.

I agree
 Not a wheel mark or wrapping machine damage. PMD

Welcome to the forum.
Not a foreign planchet, that is within the +- spec of .13g.

Not seeing anything but a Lincoln cent with staining. If there is any Doubling, please show a closeup of that area, can’t see any from photo supplied.

My answer is the same as your first post. There is no way for that to happen during the striking of the coin so by default it is damage, no matter how it happened.

Agree with the above, you would lose money having them graded. 

My answer is the same as your first post. There is no way for that to happen during the striking of the coin so by default it is damage, no matter how it happened.

One thing about damage is unless you were there when it happened, you may never know how it occurred, there are too many variables. It doesn’t really matter though, damage is damage no matter the cause.

A struck through would not be on both sides. It has been chemically altered after it left the mint.
Just a damaged quarter now.

My answer is the same as your first post. There is no way for that to happen during the striking of the coin so by default it is damage, no matter how it happened.

My answer is the same as your first post. There is no way for that to happen during the striking of the coin so by default it is damage, no matter how it happened.

A struck through would not be on both sides. It has been chemically altered after it left the mint.
Just a damaged quarter now.

That is 100% damage. There is no way that could happen during the striking of the coin.
Surprised there is even any doubt. You certainly don't need to see the coin to know it is not an error.
Worth 25 cents if you can get someone to accept it.
 
 

That is what is known as Die Deterioration Doubling (DDD), a worthless type of doubling  caused by a worn die.
Please do not use screen shots, they are too pixilated especially when you increase the size of the picture.

Agree with the Eagle,
DDD is not an error, as is not MD, they are just part of the minting process. The only “error” is the mint using the dies too long. I have seen it sometimes called a “Die Event”

One thing about damage is unless you were there when it happened, you may never know how it occurred, there are too many variables. It doesn’t really matter though, damage is damage no matter the cause.

One thing about damage is unless you were there when it happened, you may never know how it occurred, there are too many variables. It doesn’t really matter though, damage is damage no matter the cause.

That is what is known as Die Deterioration Doubling (DDD), a worthless type of doubling  caused by a worn die.
Please do not use screen shots, they are too pixilated especially when you increase the size of the picture.

Agree with the above, you would lose money having them graded. 

Agree with the above, you would lose money having them graded. 

That is 100% damage. There is no way that could happen during the striking of the coin.
Surprised there is even any doubt. You certainly don't need to see the coin to know it is not an error.
Worth 25 cents if you can get someone to accept it.
 
 

Nice find and nice photography, not much left holding that die together.