GoldFinger1969

Maybe he thought you were being aggressive...maybe he just overreacted because he had a similar negative experince trying to screw someone else a previous time. Always be civil...don't raise your voice...and if another dealer or a show promoter or even a policeman comes over and asks what is going on, just clearly state your objection if it comes to that. Like I said, unless it's clearly ILLEGAL, even if it is slimy business practices, all you can do is complain to the show promoter and/or take your business elsewhere.

If someone was doing something ILLEGAL then maybe you report them to the show producer. But I'm not sure it is worth it to go after someone who is just "slimy." There are bad actors in any group, BL. Just take your business elsewhere if the guy is that detestable.

Do LOTS of reading....get a Red Book...read Forum threads, internet websites/pages (by reputable sources, of course !), and specialty books on the types of coins you like. For me, that is largely gold coins (Double Eagles) and Morgan Silver Dollars. Lots of books on them for me to read (some updated, some dated). Reading and looking at coins are how you become knowledgeagle in this hobby.

Looks like the CERTIFIED and PEDIGREED (that is sent to a TPG and given the Fairmont label) is about 6,700 coins. There could be a much larger number that were sent in for certification but not ID'd as Fairmont coins on the label because they weren't as valaable as the 1st group above. The 3rd group would be the hoard coins itself not sent in for basic certification (not worth it, too common and/or worn). Again, the 2-part blog really goes in-depth into the population reports and does a good and understandable analysis. HIGHLY recommended !!

BL, welcome to the forum. You learned a pretty inexpensive lesson...be CAREFUL with what you buy especially as you spend more dear $$$ to you. That holder clearly looks like it was created to mimic the legitimate PCGS. PGS...PCGS....see ? Research what you want....buy certified unless you are confident of your grading skills....when in doubt (especially on pricier acquisitions) run it by this Forum here. Never feel pressured to buy something, coins are always available, especially the ones that you as a new collector are most likely looking at.

Yes, agreed....should be interesting. No, but it IS interesting. Especially to those of us without the $$$ to buy 'em !!! Seriously, I do spend lots of time on the research end of this hobby, wish I could spend more time on the buying end but that's life. So I do hope the information comes out and with DB part of the masthead at SB, I am optimistic.

What do you mean by that exactly ? I'm sure SB would have wanted proof and got it if it was just one huge hoard or several large ones....the difficulty and potential subterfuge could come into play if instead it is DOZENS of separate collections, hoards, SDBs, etc. Then you just tabulate them all at the Fairmont Hotel and call it ALL the Fairmont Collection ! Clearly, SB isn't talking -- at least right now -- but you would think DB's presence on the masthead would lead to it coming out some time. Hey, maybe he'll give the details in a new edition of the Whitman Red Book on Double Eagles -- it's been 20 years !!!

Liberty Head DEs in 2023: Doug Winters year-end wrap-up with interesting observations on the Liberty Head Double Eagle (more happening there, too, with the Fairmont Collection impact). https://raregoldcoins.com/blog/2023/12/29/the-annual-dwn-whats-hot-whats-not-list-2023-edition Not sure I agree with his rationale or anlaysis for why "Trash Twenties" are holding up...solely because of bullion investment dealers ? Doesn't make sense that a semi-scarce date like the 1891-S would jump to a huge premium to the Liberty Head DE commons.

Small Denomination Gold Supply Hits: Just to show what an increase in supply from a hoard can do, I bring you these prices on coins I don't track at all but found while reading up on the Fairmont Collection from Doug Winter's 5 Random Observation post from November 2023: "...Let’s look at the 1911-D $5 in PCGS MS63. In the 11/2023 Stack’s Bowers sale, a PCGS MS63 example brought $22,800. In March 2019, Stack’s Bowers sold a PCGS/CAC MS63 for $36,000. And what about the popular 1909-O $5? In the recent SB sale, a nice PCGS MS62 brought $28,800. In 11/2022, the same date in the same grade brought $31,200, while another PCGS MS62 brought $50,400 in the 4/2022 SB auction. This date is clearly trending downwards, and I believe that as more come onto the market, it will drop further in price." Caveat Emptor for ANY "rare" or supply-constrained coins you may buy as you never know where or when supply may come from.

Guest Commentator at Doug Winter's blog has some outstanding analysis on The Fairmont Collection. Last 2 commentaries really go in-depth to determine the composition of what has been released...what might still be out there....where the hoard supply risk is....etc: https://raregoldcoins.com/blog?category=Market Blog Of Note: the January 2024 post...scroll towards the bottom.....excellent summary of all the number-crunching and gives a nice summary....appears that this "hoard" is just under 400,000 total coins when you take into account ungradeds, details, etc. It really is massive. Could be one of the largest gold/coin hoards of U.S. coins ever, huh ? His analysis seems to be more on the composition of the hoard than where it may have come from (since that is really a speculative thing that I'm not sure we can know). I'm going to re-read the posts to see if I glossed over anything and see if I can follow the intricate guestimating he does on the composition of the denominations and supply. Quite frankly, the secrecy thing really bugs me -- especially after the coins have been sold and marketed, why not give us the damn information ? -- it's not the codes to the nuclear black box. Stacks-Bowers must know more details (they are handling the sales) and David Bowers, a numismatic researcher we all respect has dug into past hoards and is a partner, so maybe there's some hope left that we'll get more details. I understand that they have a fiduciary and business obligation to maximize the sale proceeds and if they believe giving out information like that would have (or still would) negatively impact pricing, I get being quiet. Of course, that wasn't the case with the (smaller) Saddle Ridge Hoard. We saw the same lack of details on the 1908 No Motto Wells Fargo Saint Hoard so let's not hope for a repeat.

Just wanted to say that for any non-experts who have this book and read it years ago....you may find that re-reading it a 2nd time with your accumulated knowledge from this hobby (including forums like this) makes it much easier to read and information much more sticky. I posted to this effect in another thread here. If anybody DOES re-read the book a 2nd time years after reading it the 1st time when their knowledge of Proofs was much less, I'd be interested in hearing if the 2nd time through was really beneficial. So far, I'm finding the answer is YES to another Whitman Red Book.

2nd Time Is Better: Just wanted to say that I am reading Bowers book on Double Eagles for the 2nd time and it is SO MUCH easier to comprehend lots of the data, striking and die information, intricate descriptions, etc. I think this applies to ANY book but especially ones we first read in this hobby because sometimes just getting through the book is the goal instead of retaining lots of information. That is certainly true with a huge volume like RWB's Saints book. Eventually, I am going to re-read it from beginning to end.....and the same with FMTM which was a book I really didn't absorb at all (I think I got it like 7-8 years ago before I was super-active on the coin threads). Reading and posting thousands of times on all the different forums you become that much more knowledgeable about stuff, even if you still lag the veterans and experts. But it makes re-reading books you may have just skimmed that much more immersive and understandable.

I thought the topic was "Kevin Simpson" ?

Isn't it a TOS Violation to post while under the influence of LSD ?

Do we know WHY sometimes the polishing lines show and other times they don't ? With modern coins, with everything tightly controlled, I would think we would. Must have something to do with the wear on the dies, huh ?

deleted mistake

Is there a book solely on Proof Gold Coins ?

So they go by total population census then ?

Apparently, "person" meant ANYBODY -- even kids. I think it was interpreted like that. $100 was a decent amount of savings in 1933....if you had a husband and wife and a few kids...plus some other family members like in-laws living with you (say, on a farm)....it wouldn't be a stretch to see some housholds easily be able to hold $500-$1,000 in gold....assuming they had it and could afford it.

The numismatic exemption was the loophole that allowed "gold bugs" or those who wanted to own gold to hedge inflation or economic problems. The collectors in the 1940's and 1950's (i.e., Eliasberg) took advantage of this (maybe it was in Roger's book, I can't remember). Didn't matter if the numismatic premium to gold was 20% or 2,000%. I'm kind of suprised that Spencer Marsh (1932's) and other high-profile gold folks (like the guy who sued Chase Manhattan when they seized his gold) didn't have their lawyers use this loophole. Just say you were a collector and/or the coins were not pure bullion, but part of a collection.

Roger.....on Page 151 you have FN 188 saying that until RoAC it was assumed that Barber changed the date from MCMVII to 1907. You say that was an error but the text attached to the FN doesn't imply anybody else worked on the coin. Under COMMENTARY, you mention Barber fiddling around with the design and deviating more from ASG's vision. But no other name is listed. So who are you implying was responsible for the change from the Roman to Arabic date numbers ?

Here's the EO and the exemption is listed in Section 2(b):

Are these commemoratives down in price from the 1980's bubble prices ? Have they come back a good bit or what ?

Here is the link, hope that linking ATS is permitted here: https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/comment/13643555#Comment_13643555 I commented that it was a spectacular coin....and FFL commented about the SP designation and the coin's pedigree. It's about 2/3rds of the way down the thread....make sure to check out the pictures of some great coins, including the MCMVII HR discussed here.

Let me find the post, get more info. It was a few weeks ago and I forgot about the context but should be able to find the post again.