ldhair Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 What are your thoughts? 1884 NGS PF-64 1887 PCGS PF-63 1898 PCI Early green label PF-64 Alex in PA. and GoldFinger1969 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Member: Seasoned Veteran Popular Post DWLange Posted June 12 Member: Seasoned Veteran Popular Post Share Posted June 12 Those do appear to be good candidates for NCS conservation. ldhair, Quintus Arrius and VKurtB 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numisport Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 IMO the '84 and the '98 could have eye appeal improved (if they will conserve). But you could lose a grade if a couple hairlines are revealed when the haze is removed. ldhair 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWB Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 All will be improved by removing superficial contamination (haze). The "grade" is what it is. ldhair 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ldhair Posted June 12 Author Share Posted June 12 Thank you everyone. I will be sending them in. I'll post the results. Hoghead515 and Quintus Arrius 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Member: Seasoned Veteran DWLange Posted June 12 Member: Seasoned Veteran Share Posted June 12 If you're willing to pay the additional $18 fee for variety attribution, your 1884 has a repunched date variety recognized by NGC. Be sure to click the PF tab at upper right to see the proof varieties: https://www.ngccoin.com/variety-plus/united-states/nickels/liberty-head-five-cents-1883-1913/?page=1 ldhair 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoghead515 Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 Those are some beauties. Cant wait to see them after theyre done. I think they are gorgeous in the current condition now. Id say if we we lived to be that old we would have a little haze to. I bet they will really be amazing when its removed. Please share when you get them back. I really enjoy admiring old coins like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoghead515 Posted June 12 Share Posted June 12 The 1898 looks like a cameo to me. I could be wrong though. Im no coin grader but those are stunning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
