What would ya'll grade this at?

[BipolarBaby]

[BipolarBaby]

MS 64 is my guess. Might pass as a 65?  

[JKK]

Hard telling. Might be AU-55 to AU-58; cannot easily discern if the flattening is wear. If it is not, probably MS-63. While it does have a number of little field dings, there are no major ones that are obviously disfiguring in what I consider prime focal areas.

[BipolarBaby]

yea my pictures suck. after reviewing the play, the call on the field is overruled. I think its a 62-63. 

[Mokiechan]

63 I think, lots of bagmarks on her cheek and the rooster did not strike up well. 

[BipolarBaby]

37 minutes ago, Mokiechan said:

63 I think, lots of bagmarks on her cheek and the rooster did not strike up well. 

agreed. 

[Just Bob]

From the picture, I can't tell if I see rub or a weak strike. I am hedging my bet and saying AU55.

[BipolarBaby]

24 minutes ago, Just Bob said:

From the picture, I can't tell if I see rub or a weak strike. I am hedging my bet and saying AU55.

 hmm, it has really strong cartwheel luster so I dont suspect rub, but def a weak strike. 

 

[Six Mile Rick]

Cartwheel luster does not rule out AU55 or 58. A rub is a rub. =  AU

[Numismatic, A.A.S.]

Dealer says, "VF" on the buy....Dealer says "MS 65/66" on the sell.....

[Conder101]

I grade it bullion so the numerical grade doesn't matter that much.

[BipolarBaby]

4 hours ago, Conder101 said:

I grade it bullion so the numerical grade doesn't matter that much.

hahah good point, these go for spot almost .