• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Rww

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    8

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Rww
    It's supposed to be copper tin and zinc which makes bronze. copper and zinc make brass. the one weighs 3.1 g this one weighs 2.7 g it's quite different it's not on a thin planchet
  2. Rww started following 1967 quarter error or not , 1953 D brass penny and 1953d underweight 2.7grams.
  3. Rww
    I was coin roll hunting and came across a 1953 D penny that weighed 2.7 g not of the 3.1 g. NGC tested it came back 95% copper 5% zinc I had a third party test it and came back 95% copper 5% of zinc. Not sure where to go from here any help would be much appreciated thank you
  4. Rww

    Don't let your mouth write a check your can't cash

  5. Rww
    https://www.numismaticnews.net/world-coins/rare-1943-lincoln-cent-made-of-tin-and-other-metals Trust me I've done my homework on this. Again it's just another man with a opinion! Until you had the coin in your hand you will never know. Besides what you say there's endless opportunities here to be a one of a kind. Check out this article since nobody seem to mention this
  6. Rww
    Scale is calibrated. I do not have the exact measurements at the moment but when comparing to another Lincoln cent you find it to be a slight bigger I'm not going to rule out the thin Blanchet possibility but this coin is a different composition to my understanding. It's going in for a metallurgic analysis test, so now the hard part hurry up and wait!
  7. Rww
    Can someone explain this?
  8. Rww
    Could it be a strike thru or like a dropped letter error
  9. Rww
    Pocket change
  10. Rww