• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

l.cutler

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    707

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by l.cutler

  1. l.cutler
    Your 1969 D very clearly has the FG.
  2. l.cutler
    Common date circulated Indian Head cent, worth a dollar or so.
  3. l.cutler
    No, those are just circulation marks and scratches.
  4. l.cutler
    That is a Coin World holder, they are fine. Simultaneous posting!
  5. l.cutler
    Those are all small dates. Unfortunately they all also have zinc bubbles, so they are going to be copper coated zinc. Weighing is the best and most reliable test.
  6. l.cutler
    I agree, the 1953 D is worth a few cents, the rest just face value. I'd keep the 1940 D just because it is a wheat cent, and maybe put the 1971 D in a holder to protect it, no real value on either though.
  7. l.cutler
    Definitely will need pics. All three are very common in circulated grades.
  8. l.cutler
    I don't really know anything about these coins, but a quick google search gives a value of 50 cents. Where are you seeing this high value?
  9. l.cutler
    Waiting on the weight on that one!
  10. l.cutler
    Yes, definitely two different coins.
  11. l.cutler
    It's only worth face value. Looks like it has heat damage, may have been in a fire.
  12. l.cutler
    Nope, just a quarter. You really have to get back to the silver quarters, 1964 or older, for an older circulated coin to be more than face value. Or it has to have some major errors, or be very high grade.
  13. l.cutler
    Just a quarter. It might make AU in grade judging by wear, but there are a lot of circulation hits.
  14. l.cutler
    Welcome to the forum. Your quarter is a normal coin with a lot of wear. Just worth a quarter.
  15. l.cutler
    Sorry to say, that is just a lot of damage. Looks like it may have been in a fire, or a very corrosive environment.
  16. l.cutler
    I see no reason to think it is on the wrong planchet, color seems normal and weight is very close, certainly within tolerance. If you are thinking it is on a Hong Kong 20 cent planchet, count the scallops, not even the same number.
  17. l.cutler
    Sorry to say, I have had worse here than at coin talk. They do ban a little quicker there. Bottom line, there are going to be jerks everywhere. I guess people who would be fine face to face get brave hiding behind a keyboard. Bottom line, ignore as best you can, I know it isn't always easy!
  18. l.cutler
    Even with the blurry picture I can see zinc bubbles. Worth 1 cent. Interestingly, the last time one of the 1982 D small date copper cents sold, it was way down. I think around $8,000.
  19. l.cutler
    No way to say on the first, there is no detail to tell. The second is a "parking lot coin", badly damaged Lincoln cent.
  20. l.cutler
    Nope, all those are large date.
  21. l.cutler
    OK, I guess the smaller picture in the album is just blurry. Either way, it is a zinc cent worth face value.
  22. l.cutler
    OK, the smaller picture is a bit blurry making it look like a large date, regardless. It is a zinc cent worth face value.
  23. l.cutler
    Which is exactly what I said in my first response, the first coin is a large date, the second is a small date zinc.
  24. l.cutler
    Slow down, you show at least 3 different coins, which are you talking about? In the album are a large date 1982 D and a 1983. The coin with the magnified picture is clearly a small date zinc.
  25. l.cutler
    Nice attitude, you'll last real long here. The small date coin you pictured is a zinc cent, not copper. The zinc bubbles are all over it.