Greenstang

Nice find but that is not an Off Centre Strike, that is a MAD (Misaligned Die) as it only affects one side.
 

ted4u-
Do you have a question about the picture of that damaged 1972 cent? It has nothing to do with the original post.
If you need information, please start your own post instead of piggy backing on another posting.

I agree-
White light has a tendency to hide any detail. (Please rotate your photo properly)

Glad to help.
Nice to know that you got the same answer on the other forum you posted this on.
Of course if the answer was different, THEY would have been the one's wrong 

All copper coins are worth more than face value but most wheaties  are worth more than the copper value, so save them.

As a side note, the term "Lucky Loonie " came about during the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver. The ice maker during one of the Canadian hockey games placed a 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympic Games  Loonie under the ice at the red line. Canada won the game and it was dubbed the name "Luckey Loonie".

TON-
To help you understand the difference between yours a genuine DD, I placed the word LIBERTY together to give you a better understanding.
Note on the genuine DD on the top photo how the letters have thickened on the left side from the Doubling. This is not present on yours. Remember, to be a DD, it has to be exactly the same as the original. Photos are blurry but you should be able to see the difference.

Sorry but just noticed this post now. I have some info that might help.  Check out website supplied, the first section references the coin  Apparently produced by Central Glass Company. Also supplied photo of coin without chip
 
                                       
https://www.realorrepro.com/article...ressed-Glass
 

Congratulations !!!         Your coin searching has paid off.
It's always nice when a fellow forum member can have a coin attributed.

The "Floating Roof" and no FG can occur on any LMC business strike as it is caused by overpolishing the dies. What you may be thinking of is the 1970S Proof Strikes
 

Karen has some good points but if we had more information, we might be able to help you more.
You don't indicate what type of collection it is, Mainly US, Foreign, mixed?
Condition is a big factor in the value of the coin, do  you know  approximate grades of the coins?
What years and nominations are most of them?
Are any of the coins graded?
Are they loose or are they in albums or 2x2's?
How many gold and silver coins are there?
Are you looking to sell them quickly at a reduced price or are you willing to wait to get the best price?
By using the internet, there is  much information on just about any coin out there. I use the eBay sold list to give me an approximate value of coins.
Looking forward to see what you have. Perhaps you can post some photos of both sides of some of them.

https://www.pmgnotes.com/

Did you not show the 2002D earlier? Anyhow, it has been burned changing the copper to black. Probably with a cigarette lighter.
The 1968 has been environmentally toned, by what I 'm not sure.
Neither one had this happen during the striking of the coin so they can't be errors.

Agree with Conder-
It has that replated look that I have seen on many 1943's that shows no sign of wear. Easy to check, just look at the edge and if it looks like the rest of the coin, it is replated. The edge should be steel as the blanks were punched out after the sheets were zinc coated.
It is not uncommon to have these coins reprocessed/replated in order to make them look like a higher grade for selling.(See Littlejohns)
 

Beautiful. Love the colour.

Nice, even got a Cameo grade.
This will certainly end the debate on your earlier post.

Congratulations- Nice to have found it yourself.
 

With those large, clear pictures, it was a no brainer.
An easier way to tell than looking at the AME  is to look at the A in STATES, If it is centred between the T's, it is a WAM, if it is off to the right, it is a CAM. As you can easily tell by your picture, it is a WAM

It's counterfeit, compare to genuine coin
The hair is too deeply grooved and the type looks wrong. 
These early coins were all hand cut by an engraver and there is usually cut lines around the type.

There were  many counterfeits of these made. In fact Disney produced them for it's Pirates of the Caribbean souvenir shop.
Did you test it with a magnet to see if it is silver? That would at least eliminate some of the counterfeits.

Why do you think every 1969S you have is a DD. Yours is not even close. Look at the word GOD on a genuine FS101 and honestly tell me yours the same.

Please state  your question when posting so we don't have to guess. Not sure what that top photo is supposed to be.

First, a repunched MM is not an error, it is a variety. A repunched MM happens when the worker punches the MM into the working die. Usually they have to be struck more than once to obtain the desired depth and sometimes the punch moves slightly causing what is known as a repunched MM. They are not uncommon as however many coins are minted from that die (say750,000) then that's how many there will be. See the enclosed photo compliments of John Wexler of the process of punching a MM. It is hard to tell from the OP's photo if it is repunched or not but I suspect it is MD.

Just another of your Machine Doubling 1969's. (Much better picture by the way)

Yes it is very possible for a Proof to have DDO. As all proofs are struck twice, it is not uncommon for them to have  DD. If you have a strong microscope and look at a Proof Coin, you can probably see some sort slight doubling on a lot of them.