• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Greenstang

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    4,042
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Everything posted by Greenstang

  1. This should really be in the PMG forum but to answer your question, you can’t really call a number rare as every serial number in that series is one of a kind. As far as your bills go., there is no collecter value to them but someone might like them as a Novelty number.
  2. I would check your scales as you are in between but if I had to guess by the looks of the coin, I would say it was copper plated zinc.
  3. It is only the major DD’s that are worth a big premium. There are many minor DD’s out there that are certainly not worth the cost of grading. Don’t forget that if the Mint got a million strikes of that die, then there would be a million out there the same as yours and this goes for most of the minor DD’s as well.
  4. Welcome to the Forum The only head I see is Washington’s head on the Obverse. The reverse is just a stain. Value 5 cents
  5. The one on the left is a Small Date. Please take photo of both sides of that cent.
  6. Welcome to the Forum Your first picture is really too small and the second shows nothing. Please crop your photos and always show both sides to make it easier for us to help you. If your asking about the filled D, it is caused by a broken post. Doesn’t really add much value as they are pretty common on D mint marks. If you want other information, please specify
  7. Something that I do. Instead of looking at things as errors and then seeing if it is damage instead, look at it as damage (which it is most of the time) and then see if it was possible for it to have happened during the striking of the coin. If it is not possible, then it is still damage even if you don’t know how it happened
  8. Well put JustBob I do have an "just ignore list". I find it easier to just ignore some individuals (there have been a couple on here recently that when you try to help them they just contradict whatever you say) so it is just easier to not try to help them and ignore them. That being said there are other "newbies" who are willing to learn from what they are told and if they question what you tell them, it is just because they are trying to learn the reason for your answer for future reference.
  9. Welcome to the Forum It's called a counterstamp. It has intentionally been stamped after the coin left the mint. Hard to say for what reason but it is not unusual to see them.
  10. The 1995 is not a die clash. Looks like something has eaten away at the coin. In the future, please post your pictures right side up
  11. Can we see the whole coin both sides instead of four pictures the same.
  12. Welcome to the Forum Don’t see any Doubling. Looks like a regular 1960 cent. I would like to know where you see about 10 errors on the coin. I can’t see any.
  13. Welcome to the Forum Who graded it? Could you supply a picture or better still a link to the site.
  14. Seeing there is no known variety on the date, my only explanation is that the blunt 5 has taken a hit on the tip. By increasing the size of your photo, you can see a slight notch on the bottom where the tip has been broken off. As far as the thick and thin numbers, it looks like the thick number die is starting to wear and has some deterioration causing a thicker number. (Best I can come up with)
  15. It would probably depend on the grade of the uncirculated coin.
  16. How can that be a 1965 coin with King George V on it? In 1965 it would have the current Queen Elizabeth as the face. Also all coins from the UK have Latin wording.
  17. Please state where you see DD when asking. I don’t see any but I might be looking at the wrong place. Lincoln’s lips look like they have taken a hit. No extra value that I can see.
  18. All I see are some die chips and either damage or a small Struck Through. In either case not anything that would add much value. On the 1979 it looks like a broken post on the D mm. The Canadian dime looks like damage
  19. It’s Latin. What is the photo of the 1965 with the die chip for.
  20. Welcome to the Forum. A no mm 1979 quarter means it was produced at the Philadelphia Mint so it is normal. I think it was 1980 before Philadelphia started putting a P mm on their quarters
  21. Can you be more specific, not quite sure what your referring to. Also it cannot be a cud error as a cud involves the rim.