• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Fenntucky Mike

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    2,634
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Posts posted by Fenntucky Mike

  1. Sounds like you've got a good setup going now. Pretty similar to what I have.

    I also like the hard cases with the foam rails and handle, only problem with those is the foam will form a "memory" to the slab. Say you left an NGC slab in one of the slots for an extended period of time, the foam will compress and conform to the shape of the NGC slab, creating a "memory" in the foam. The problem with this is if you remove the NGC slab and insert a PCGS slab, the PCGS being smaller (thinner) will be extremely loose in the slot where the NGC slab was and could dislodge.

  2. I don't think you can purchase a monster box direct from the mint unless you are an authorized dealer. Which means you'll have to purchase it through a third party at a higher cost. Search the web, type in 2020 ASE Monster Box, something will pop up.

    If it was me No. The ship has kind of sailed on these, if you didn't get in right away it's probably hard to turn a profit. If you can't make money selling them for $155 a piece (which is what they are selling for now, graded (price is falling)) then I would not have them certified. The mint made and probably still is making a lot of these, I doubt they will increase much in value beyond their silver content. Just me.

     

  3. A blast white "Plus" please. 

    I'd consider "star" over plus if the coin has complete and even cobalt blue toning.

    In general "Plus" over "Star", it's at the high end of the grade (or slightly better). Some people like the "Pluses" for the resubmission game, or have them in case they ever want to.

  4. 1 hour ago, Insider said:

    YES

    Prepare to be disappointed if you're expecting 20 individuals to reply in a timely manner.

    Don't post much as I don't usually have anything constructive to add to the conversation but I do enjoy the heavyweights going back and forth on relevant topics. Time and a continued variety of good topics/discussions is the only thing that will bring people in and keep them here.

    Be glad you're not on the PMG boards.

  5. No takers on #58 yet...

    73469881_Untitled.png.2fec645d7355fab7ec3dce772474b3ff.png

    You can still purchase them from the mint. With a product limit of 75,000 and it being a week with coins still available, I'd say that for the most part everybody who really wanted one has one. Hand signed and numbered does add some value but in my experience you don't start getting the big $'s unless the # is 10 or less.

  6. 48 minutes ago, Crruisercharlie said:

    Hmmm...we must be looking at different screens even though I followed your link. There is no ladder icon that I can find and no listings for goodacres. I found millennium sets and cheerios and reverse prototypes but no goodacres

    The Goodacres are listed in the PF section.

    jkadskjfhiuh.png.d1845d0a1a8bdf604a552a0ebae27162.png

  7. If you're talking about the difference between an investment-grade bullion coin and commemorative or numismatic bullion coin then yes, there is a difference, in general it is the condition, strike, and rarity. But despite the differences they are still comprised of the same stuff, precious metal/s, which in general (for modern NCLT) lumps all of them into the same group, bullion. From which they are broken down further into smaller groups by country, series, MS, PF, etc. Your coin is a bullion coin, not in the sense that it is only worth its bullion content but that it is comprised of precious metal/s. They don't arrange these sets based on a coins value or what type of investment it is.

    If you were to take one of your proof coins comprised of a precious metal and drag it around the parking lot, it would most likely loose all value above its worth in bullion but it would still be a proof. A bullion proof (impaired).

  8. Not a debacle in my mind, a limited mintage that sold out in minutes. Some people got them some didn't, some people made money some didn't, some presumably overpaid some chose to wait.

    Give it 5 years and you'll probably be able to pick one up at a reasonable price, we'll see.

    Nothing that hasn't happened before. It will happen again and I'm guessing as soon as the WWII 75th Anniversary privy is released, maybe the first officially colorized coins as well but that's a topic for another thread.

  9.  

    2 hours ago, World Colonial said:

    One: The collector base for most series is too small

    Yes, if you're talking about getting a TPG to recognize more varieties. 

    I have several foreign sets that include varieties. Getting the varieties recognized by a TPG is a challenge, 9 out of 10 would be rejected due to popularity (a collector base), not for lack of documentation or examples. Varieties can be well documented in the coins country of origin, in books from that country or region and even by the mint/producer themselves but for the most part if the variety is not in the Standard Catalog you'll have a hard time getting it recognized. 

    I think there is just as large a pool of variety seekers for world coinage as U.S. coinage but but divide that pool up by X number of countries and you just don't have the collector per capita need to get most world varieties recognized. Even though, in that region or country variety/error collecting is most likely very popular.

    TPG's lack of interest in recognizing "low value" (in the U.S.) world varieties at least in part discourages collecting along those lines. There is not enough interest so the TPG's don't want to invest the time which stifles growth in that area of collecting. For my current focus (Ukrainian coinage) there are many books, papers and examples of varieties and errors. It's a very well documented area and almost none would be TPG accepted. All of mine are safely tucked away in 2 x 2's.

  10. Hi,

    What do you think about creating a set for Ukrainian Mint Medals or Medals of the NBU, Mint State and Proof. Or just the silver medals similar to the South Korea, Silver Official Mint Medals, 2013 - Date, Mint State and Proof set.

    Here's some cert #'s for reference.

    2844649-001

    2844649-002

    2830110-024

    2823400-015

    2833327-002

    2830110-025

    Thanks,

    Mike

  11. Wayland, MI - Boggs Recreation

    $0.10 Aluminum, 25mm, 1.39g, diamond, Type 1 reverse "R" merges into "¢"

    Obverse.JPG.3aba52833bb95680962e8e0836f81bf7.JPGReverse.JPG.68d4445cd467d58294888f01f62d2461.JPG

    $0.10 Aluminum, 25mm, 1.39g, diamond, Type 2 reverse "R" & "¢" narrow gap.

    Obverse.JPG.743e74f40d9d05c1f061ef7de343986b.JPGReverse.JPG.bd242f992d6c64668d1eeeed019f5f59.JPG

    There is also a Type 3 reverse ("R" & "¢" wide gap) and a Type 2 obverse with a bow tie instead of diamond. Neither of which I have yet, I do know where there is a Type 3 reverse just haven't been able to acquire it yet.:frustrated:

    $0.05 Aluminum, 22mm, 1.00g, Diamond

    Obverse.JPG.69835f6b967c6a51a38d5fcc919021af.JPGReverse.JPG.68b201bdcfe48bcb35d7ccaeb7bdb9db.JPG

    There is a Type 2 coin with no diamond and the abbreviation "ST." where the diamond was/is. There is also a variety with the address as "28" instead of "128", not sure if it is a die error or if they just moved down the street. Seems to be a die error.

    Boggs Recreation has been proving elusive for me in the little research I've done so far, so no historical tie in for these guys yet.