• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

morganthebrave

Member
  • Posts

    133
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Journal Comments posted by morganthebrave

  1. Have asked for an xrf scan of the coin in the capsule.

    Most of the medals struck around 1936/7 of Edward VIII kept with the nostalgic theme of the era. Each Minter however, gave variety to the design in their own way. Some medals struck then are not listed in any of the known catalogs (BHM / Portraits of a Prince) which makes collecting Edward VIII medals/ tokens/ coinage all that more exciting.

  2. Hi Guest. I can say that there was a mintage of a thousand of the silver made by Pinches and Co actually in 1937. The medal is 35mm in size. Information obtained from the Portraits of a Prince, J. Giordano. Some previous sales was with Stack's lot 2026 and Baldwins lot 747, Sept 2008. Furthermore Pinches also made gold  (100 pieces) at 22ct, bronze (3000 pieces).

    I have not xrf'd the silver piece but I could comment and say it appears less than 9.25...probably about 80% silver. I will get back with an actual silver content soon.

  3. Thanks MK123 and Just Bob for the comments. As long as it does not grade details I will accept any grade! Yes - I would say 203 qualifies for a low mintage classification. Hard to obtain one of these medals. I was fortunate to acquire this medal in such prestige condition. The owner obviously took great care in maintaining its quality. Lets see if NGC also recognize the prestige medal in terms of a good grade.

  4. Thanks MK123 - I will post in the Ask NGC/ NCS section. Matt from NGC answered my request to have a South Africa Silver Rand variety recognized by NGC to which he promptly action-ed and the NGC Graders have now approved the variety designation. I just need to get the items together re pics and the NGC submission numbers. Thank you for the reply MK123

  5. Thanks MK123 for the advice. I have always been somewhat hesitant in phoning NGC (or even PCGS ) on such matters -  maybe they are able to explain as to why the 'not genuine' designation.

    In the interim, I have done a research on the medal in question and it appears that several trial pieces had come about back then but not much documentation is known on the subject.

    I would tend to think this is a trial piece.

    *May I ask if you have experience in contacting NGC for a similar type issue / concern and how was it handled by them? Just curious as to how their approach is in dealing with a 'not genuine' designation.

    I am probably straying of the topic somewhat but back in 2015, I had two gold German coins that came back with 'Authenticity questionable'  and had never actually found out why. They weighed the correct weight, I found no fault with their effigies. The condition was immaculate - perhaps to good to be true. The coins come from a deceased estate of a known collector who had wrapped these coins up in cloth and kept in a box for the last 85 years. They were purchased in around 1962. I doubt they are forgeries.

    I did contemplate sending these two German gold coins to a known German Collector for a review but if contacting NGC is probably a faster and better method and NGC can advice me further what to do to prove the medal is genuine then I should do that.

    Are you able to comment on * sir?

     

  6. A submitted Edward VIII medal came back from NGC as 'not genuine'. The Seller who I bought it from assures me it is and that NGC can incorrectly examine coins / medals.

    image.png.eee055a1efc72e3c4abc7d63596ca893.png

    I would find it hard to image that the above medal would be a counterfeit as there are non reported as such. The 'not genuine' I understand is that the medal diameter is larger -  I wonder if  perhaps, due to a lack of written information on this unique piece, that it is indeed a trial/ pattern and that NGC may have mistakenly 'error-ed' on the grading?

    Should I resubmit to NGC and add the 'review' fee?