• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

James_OldeTowne

Member: Seasoned Veteran
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    16,033

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Everything posted by James_OldeTowne

  1. James_OldeTowne
    AU-53.
  2. James_OldeTowne
    It's what some call classic "shelf doubling", I believe.
  3. James_OldeTowne
    Nothing regarding certification would add value to this very ordinary quarter.
  4. James_OldeTowne
    And I agree as well - if you are asking whether certification would be financially beneficial, then no way is that the case.
  5. James_OldeTowne
    Most definitely "BN". A brown-designated cent can retain a considerable amount of original mint red color, yet still not qualify as "RB".
  6. James_OldeTowne
    The pics don't show anything unusual that I can see.
  7. James_OldeTowne
    There are better-crafted explanations already posted. Basically, it looks to me like the dies were too far apart when the coin was struck, or the planchet was a little too thin. At any rate, the net striking pressure wasn't adequate to strike out the as-made striations.
  8. James_OldeTowne
    I agree with the prior post - sharpness of "fine". It's tough to decipher whether it's been cleaned or altered, though.
  9. James_OldeTowne
    Here is a 1969-B $20 bill with a somewhat comparable backstory from 1973, except that it did receive a reply from the Department of the Treasury - enjoy.
  10. James_OldeTowne
    "CC" = "counterfeit coin" ??
  11. James_OldeTowne
    Getting it certified will almost certainly add nothing to the sentimental value, if your intent is to pass it down. A 2x2 holder would be much cheaper and more interesting, especially as you could write something personal on the holder. The coin appears to grade something like MS-62 if I am interpreting the photos correctly.
  12. James_OldeTowne
    I agree with what was previously stated. There appears to be residue adhering to the coin.
  13. James_OldeTowne
    These photos show no discernible evidence of any kind of special finish.
  14. James_OldeTowne
    That kind of toning spot is commonly seen and only detracts from the value of a typical coin. A classic situation is when a coin is in a 2x2 or flip, and a tiny hole permits air to enter, creating just such a distraction.
  15. James_OldeTowne
    Numerous circumstances could create that look, none of which add value or numismatic interest.
  16. James_OldeTowne
    I see nothing notable based only on the photos.
  17. James_OldeTowne
    16x face.
  18. James_OldeTowne
    It's worth about 16 times face due to silver content.
  19. James_OldeTowne
    Going only by the photos, I would not spend money to certify this dollar.
  20. James_OldeTowne
    It appears to be polished or even whizzed, but it's a genuine example. This is perfect for use as a pocket piece!
  21. James_OldeTowne
    My only contribution is to agree that it is a Tibet, 1-sho. One doesn't see these very often.
  22. James_OldeTowne
    Those are really excellent photos! I'm jealous!
  23. James_OldeTowne
    Given that these can still be found in pocket change, it's true value is 1-cent. However, numismatically, wholesale/retail is something like 1.5 cents to what Conder quoted.
  24. James_OldeTowne
    Roger, just out of curiosity, how does that come into play with regard to the 1964 Peace dollar?
  25. James_OldeTowne
    Others will rank the provenance differently than I would, but Newman stands head and shoulders above the rest for his astonishing contributions to the hobby. What did Eliasberg really contribute to the hobby we know today? He got an example of every coin and then was done. Newman contributed to my enjoyment across a lifetime.