• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Will the removal of " In God We Trust" from the edge of the...

16 posts in this topic

Presidential Dollar series to either the obverse or reverse of the coin make these first two coins, Washington & Adams more desireable ? CoinWorld, July 2nd. reported that legislation is apparently moving forward to relocate the IGWT motto from the edge to either obverse or reverse side. Will these two coins be instant collectibles for everyone ? If passed, these two coins will certainly be unique !

 

I will put a few rolls away, also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they will be not different than the no motto versions of the Saint Gaudens eagle and double eagles from 1907-08. Just a subtype, like moving the mintmarks from the reverse to the obverse on most coins in the late 1960s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's good to see our legislators hard at work on something worthwhile. screwy.gif

 

My favorite forward of late is the one demanding that we not accept these coins as change, due to the "removal of God from the coin," so that we can force them out of circulation. I guess the original writer of the e-mail has failed to notice that no quarter-sized dollar coin has been popular with the masses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

which one? pick one, obverse or reverse?? Or is that how it got on the edge in the first place.

 

How about allowing for a silver spouse coin, too. I'll have to write my congressman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

which one? pick one, obverse or reverse?? Or is that how it got on the edge in the first place.

 

How about allowing for a silver spouse coin, too. I'll have to write my congressman.

 

They already offer bronze medals, they don't need silver ones too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

H.R.2510 was introduced on May 24, 2007 by Virgil Goode (R-VA). There are 88 cosponsors, all members of the GOP. The bill was referred to the House Financial Services Committee, Barney Frank (D-MA) is the chairman.

 

As this bill is written, it calls for Section 5112(n)(2) of title 31, United States Code, to be amended to remove "In God We Trust" from the description of the edge and add "(F) INSCRIPTION OF `IN GOD WE TRUST'- The design on the obverse or the reverse shall bear the inscription `In God We Trust'."

 

A few realities:

  • The bill is referred to a committee chaired by someone against this bill
  • The committee chair controls the agenda and schedules hearings and votes
  • Aside from Rep. Frank, there are 36 Dem0crats on the committee, none of them are cosponsors or supporters of this bill
  • Less than half of the 34 GOP members are cosponsors
  • Spencer Bachus (R-AL), the ranking member, is not a cosponsor of this bill

Therefore, considering the makeup of the committee, the political realities, that the chairman is against the bill, and the Mint is against the measure after spending a lot of money to purchase the machine to strike the edge lettering, the likelihood of this bill passing is slim to none, and slim is losing!

 

Edited to add: Just remember, just because a bill is introduced does not mean it will become the law. Sometimes, bills are introduced for show. I have a feeling is that this is a "show the folks back home we're listening" bill.

 

Scott hi.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

which one? pick one, obverse or reverse??

 

 

...guess they'll have to flip a coin to decide. wink.gif

 

 

 

 

Thank you for the info Scott!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well there really ins't much room on either side. They will have to remove something or make the letters so small you can't read them. confused-smiley-013.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well there really ins't much room on either side. They will have to remove something or make the letters so small you can't read them. confused-smiley-013.gif

 

I think they might be able to pull it off by placing the letters on the reverse, underneath "United States of America." That or they could just completely redesign the reverse and give me my eagle back... stupid statue of liberty...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congress is also looking at the possibility of changing the Sacagawea $. For one thing, they want to include her name, Sakakawea, which is the preferred Native American spelling. They would also like to replace the eagle on the reverse with noteworthy events, places, etc. in Native American history. The article in Coin World mentioned a few of the possibilities, but they did not mention others that should be noteworthy like 1) the Code Talkers, 2) the fact that the Seminole Tribe has never signed a peace treaty with the U.S., 3) the Seminoles win landmark decision allowing Native American tribes to establish casinos, 4) of course, there are numerous individuals of note like Sitting Bull, Geronimo, James Billy, etc. but we're not allowed to have a two-headed coin.

 

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will these two coins be instant collectibles for everyone ? If passed, these two coins will certainly be unique !

 

I would think that these two would certainly be unique, if they turn out to be the only ones. Thanks for the info Carson City, I will also be putting a few rolls away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites