• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Post your most recent acquisition: US
8 8

20,908 posts in this topic

Thanks. The 98-O was impulse as I already have a 65DPL in this date/mint mark.

 

I thought the 03-O was extremely well struck for New Orleans and loved the clean cheek.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. The 98-O was impulse as I already have a 65DPL in this date/mint mark.

 

I thought the 03-O was extremely well struck for New Orleans and loved the clean cheek.

 

The image is very small on the 1903-O, but the surfaces look pretty clean. It might be an upgrade candidate, but I would have to see larger images. :) I like both of your coins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. The 98-O was impulse as I already have a 65DPL in this date/mint mark.

 

I thought the 03-O was extremely well struck for New Orleans and loved the clean cheek.

 

The image is very small on the 1903-O, but the surfaces look pretty clean. It might be an upgrade candidate, but I would have to see larger images. :) I like both of your coins.

 

I was thinking the same thing about upgrade potential. I think this picture will be larger.

 

03-OMS65_zps673d69b7.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Deerefan. I think the reverse on the 03-O is what kept the grade at 65. There's a little chatter at 12 above the eagle's head, but there's a very noticeable bag mark at 4:30. I'll have to wait until I get it in hand to see. I just thought the obverse was so clean I wanted to add it to my collection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robec - That's one very special coin - one of the nicest I have seen in AU !!

 

Aside from a smattering of Barbers - I was able to upgrade my SLQ collection yesterday on the Heritage Auction. The 27-D I have is a nice MS 63 - now - I have a nicer struck MS 64 with a CAC... Pretty pleased with it:

 

1927-DQuarterPCGS64CACObv_zpsd34d91ff.jpg

 

1927-DQuarterPCGS64CACRev_zpsb3b1f430.jpg

Edited by Elbesaar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of great looking coins everyone! :applause:

 

I particularly like Bob's DBHE. (worship) BTW, what denomination is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for all the glowing comments.

Sy, the denomination is a dollar. In most cases the minors would have been out of reach in AU.

My current goal to add a Flowing hair dollar to keep it company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is a pretty cool medal design. This is a uniface restrike of the obverse die of the Baker-60 Washington Born Virginia Medal.

 

A little background information: In 1959, Albert Collis created a transfer die of the original die used to strike the undated "Washington Born Virginia" Medals (Jacob Perkins, c. 1792). Using the copy die, Collis struck the following examples, all uniface (mintages in parentheses): Platinum (1); Lead (1); Gold (7); Silver (22); Copper (5,019). Once the restriking was completed, Collis donated the die to the American Numismatic Association, where it resides today.

 

This is one of the 5,019 copper pieces, with what I find to be quite attractive toning (the obverse really is that pinkish/red color in the upper left).

 

1959_Washington_CollisRestrike_NGC_MS64RB_composite_zpsd4e33065.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very cool piece Brandon. Thanks for posting and giving us the history of this medal.

 

+3. Me likey! :applause:

 

 

No pictures yet, but I purchased 4 raw Washington 25 c toners at the Santa Clara show; a fairly well circulated 1942-D with album toning, a ~MS64 1964 with mint set toning (which is a bit odd as 1964 was after the paper mint sets that imparted the toning were used... however it was not uncommon for people to stick new coins in old holders), a 1944-S in ~MS66 with album toning, and (my personal favorite) a 1963 in ~MS66 with, most likely, album toning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

morganguru

This coin belongs to Robec and his image perhaps Bob will answer your question.. I would imagine the size of the planchet among other things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rrantique - Spectacular piece and even better image. Excuse my ignorance but how does one determine what the denomination is?

 

It is tough to tell by a photo. In hand it would be obvious which is the dollar, half dollar or quarter. The dollar actually larger than the Morgan dollar in both weight and diameter.

 

Both Draped Bust dollars and half dollars have lettered edges with the denomination. The quarter and dime have reeded edges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rrantique - Spectacular piece and even better image. Excuse my ignorance but how does one determine what the denomination is?

 

It is tough to tell by a photo. In hand it would be obvious which is the dollar, half dollar or quarter. The dollar actually larger than the Morgan dollar in both weight and diameter.

 

Both Draped Bust dollars and half dollars have lettered edges with the denomination. The quarter and dime have reeded edges.

 

A quick indicator is the denticles. The coin you have posted is obviously a dollar based on the number and size of the denticles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just picked this one up. 1805 Half dime

These are a difficult little coin to get so this one has some issues but will do for a while

 

img]   <img src=[/img]

Edited by x2rider
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
8 8