Clay1492 Posted December 25, 2021 Share Posted December 25, 2021 I,m guessing this is machine doubling because I can't find a listing for a 58d ddo, but thought I would ask. Also, is that a normal die clash in front of and behind the bust? Also on the neck. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J P M Posted December 25, 2021 Share Posted December 25, 2021 I don't see anything but a shadow, Sorry but I do find it strange that your camera reversed the date on the first shot it looks incuse. I have seen the new phone cameras doing this a few times? Fenntucky Mike 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenntucky Mike Posted December 25, 2021 Share Posted December 25, 2021 On 12/25/2021 at 6:25 AM, J P Mashoke said: Sorry but I do find it strange that your camera reversed the date on the first shot it looks incuse. LOL! I thought the exact same thing there for a minute JP but the numbers are raised, it's like one of those 3D puzzles. I replied to the duplicate post. Merry Christmas! J P M and RonnieR131 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoghead515 Posted December 25, 2021 Share Posted December 25, 2021 I agree that is just strike doubling. But I think that just may be a clash. I see what you are seeing. I may be wrong but it sure looks like a minor clash. Some better pics would be great to tell for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldhoopster Posted December 25, 2021 Share Posted December 25, 2021 I don't think there is anything that resembles clash, but it's tough to tell from the pics. Here is the overlay from Maddie Clashes if you want to do some more checking, especially in the field in front of the nose. Not seeing any DDO either. What doubling I see is flat with no notching/split serifs, which are characteristics of Mechanical Doubling. IGWT is too fuzzy, but if there is flat doubling, it's MD Hoghead515 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWB Posted December 26, 2021 Share Posted December 26, 2021 On 12/25/2021 at 6:25 AM, J P Mashoke said: Sorry but I do find it strange that your camera reversed the date on the first shot it looks incuse. Those were the old "Flexi-Date" test coins. They automatically shifted from raised to incuse lettering in an attempt to reduce circulation wear. But -- the battery was bigger than the coin.... RonnieR131 and J P M 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoghead515 Posted December 26, 2021 Share Posted December 26, 2021 That first picture will sure play tricks on the eyes. Had to look at it for a few. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
