1936D Three 1/2 legged Buffalo nickel 0

[Big coinage]

I’m just not sure if this coin is the three 1/2 legged or not 

[Fenntucky Mike]

Looks like a standard four leg to me. I can still see the shin of the right foreleg pretty clearly. It just seems too defined to be the 3 1/2 leg, to me anyway but others may disagree. 

Edited October 15, 2021 by Fenntucky Mike
More Info

[Big coinage]

Thanks I looked at it under a magnifying glass and below the joint it looks thin that’s why I thought it might be the one but thanks for the reply 👍🏻

[Jason Abshier]

Doesn’t look like 3-1/2 legged to me either . Although color looks off looks almost like environmental damage or if it was dipped in an acid long ago not washed off properly ? 

[Greenstang]

Not a 3 1/2 Legger.

The front leg should be partially missing. Your coin has a full leg.

[RWB]

IN the fall they occasionally issued 5-leg bison....

[Mohawk]

Looks like a standard 4 legged Buffalo to me.

[VKurtB]

The fact that yours is a 1936-D and not a 1937-D should have been your first clue it’s not a 3-legger. 

[VKurtB]

On 10/15/2021 at 7:36 PM, RWB said:

IN the fall they occasionally issued 5-leg bison....

Ooh, more osso buco!

[Big coinage]

VKURTB If you would have read it carefully I didn’t say three legged I asked about a three 1/2 legged and that was in 1936 not in 1937 that is where the three legged Buffalo are 

[EARLY-COMMEM-HUNTER]

Negative.  Sorry 

[VKurtB]

On 10/17/2021 at 4:30 PM, Big coinage said:

VKURTB If you would have read it carefully I didn’t say three legged I asked about a three 1/2 legged and that was in 1936 not in 1937 that is where the three legged Buffalo are 

Sorry, I don’t really recognize the 3-1/2 at all. I don’t do “almost”.