Another O mint Morgan!! GTG on this 1903-o

[FILTHYHOARD]

Warning!!!! The eagle appears as if it's going to fly right off of the reverse!!

This New Orleans Morgan was absolutely hammered IMHO

Soooooooooo, please guess the grade on this 1903-o

 

[coinman_23885]

66+

[jgrinz]

Worlds are ending - Kenny and I are agreeing )

 

"MS66" a little more hammered on the left wing and marks gone on the lower neck, This would be a 67

 

A "+" because the glowing fields are killer !

 

 

[cpm9ball]

I'd be tempted to give it a 67.

 

Chris

[Mary B]

MS-65 the notch in the neck detracts from being a 66

[dragon]

MS-65 the notch in the neck detracts from being a 66

 

 

 

That notch on the lower neck is a design element of the coin and not a post mint bagmark.

[physics-fan3.14]

Easily a 66, with a really good shot at 67.

[MarkFeld]

66

[Walkerfan]

I'll agree that it is a MS 66.

[mtnstyne]

First impression was 66.

[Kenneth F]

Im thinking high 66 (66+possible). Slight issues but not much to shake a stick at.. the hit on her throat is the only real issue i see.

 

 

(Disclaimer, I am by no means an expert.. I just read books on Morgans.. alot of them). ha ha ha

[Mary B]

Learn something new, have never seen it and I have a 1903-O in the stash.

 

MS-65 the notch in the neck detracts from being a 66

 

 

 

That notch on the lower neck is a design element of the coin and not a post mint bagmark.

[rrantique]

Great photo Don and a great strike for an O mint. I think it is a 66+ (thumbs u

[Mark T]

I think it is a 66 + as well. Only reason I dont give it a 67 is becuase I dont think you would spend 3 K for an MS67 or would you ??

[coinman_23885]

Worlds are ending - Kenny and I are agreeing )

 

"MS66" a little more hammered on the left wing and marks gone on the lower neck, This would be a 67

 

A "+" because the glowing fields are killer !

 

 

[Ryan S.]

An absolutely stunning later date Morgan & indeed the pictures are perfect as well!

I'll say MS-66 but it deserves a +

:-)

[FILTHYHOARD]

I think it is a 66 + as well. Only reason I dont give it a 67 is becuase I dont think you would spend 3 K for an MS67 or would you ??

 

Sure Mark, I'd spend 3k on a MS67 Morgan , An 1893-s!!!!

[FILTHYHOARD]

Well, pretty much everyone nailed this one. A VERY solid MS66.

Plus worthy? I think so, but I'm happy where it is and calling it undergraded by half a point. The reverse is the star on this coin and if not for that teeny hit on the obverse, a 67 all the way. The mark on the throat isn't very visible in hand OR in Heritage's photo

[coinman_23885]

Well, pretty much everyone nailed this one. A VERY solid MS66.

Plus worthy? I think so, but I'm happy where it is and calling it undergraded by half a point.

 

Judging by the slab design, this coin was certified well before NGC implemented its plus designation. If it makes a difference to you, I do think you would receive an upgrade to a MS66+ if resubmitted. Regardless, the coin is truly superb. Congratulations.

[FILTHYHOARD]

Thanks Kenny, I'm happy where it's at. (thumbs u

[MarkFeld]

Well, pretty much everyone nailed this one. A VERY solid MS66.

Plus worthy? I think so, but I'm happy where it is and calling it undergraded by half a point.

 

Judging by the slab design, this coin was certified well before NGC implemented its plus designation. If it makes a difference to you, I do think you would receive an upgrade to a MS66+ if resubmitted. Regardless, the coin is truly superb. Congratulations.

 

I guessed MS66 from the first photo and the second one is less flattering. I do not believe the coin would garner a plus, if resubmitted.

[FILTHYHOARD]

Well, pretty much everyone nailed this one. A VERY solid MS66.

Plus worthy? I think so, but I'm happy where it is and calling it undergraded by half a point.

 

Judging by the slab design, this coin was certified well before NGC implemented its plus designation. If it makes a difference to you, I do think you would receive an upgrade to a MS66+ if resubmitted. Regardless, the coin is truly superb. Congratulations.

 

I guessed MS66 from the first photo and the second one is less flattering. I do not believe the coin would garner a plus, if resubmitted.

 

Hi Mark, the second image of the slab was Heritage's photo and I admit, not very flattering at all

[coinman_23885]

Well, pretty much everyone nailed this one. A VERY solid MS66.

Plus worthy? I think so, but I'm happy where it is and calling it undergraded by half a point.

 

Judging by the slab design, this coin was certified well before NGC implemented its plus designation. If it makes a difference to you, I do think you would receive an upgrade to a MS66+ if resubmitted. Regardless, the coin is truly superb. Congratulations.

 

I guessed MS66 from the first photo and the second one is less flattering. I do not believe the coin would garner a plus, if resubmitted.

 

Would you still grade it as a 66?

[MarkFeld]

Well, pretty much everyone nailed this one. A VERY solid MS66.

Plus worthy? I think so, but I'm happy where it is and calling it undergraded by half a point.

 

Judging by the slab design, this coin was certified well before NGC implemented its plus designation. If it makes a difference to you, I do think you would receive an upgrade to a MS66+ if resubmitted. Regardless, the coin is truly superb. Congratulations.

 

I guessed MS66 from the first photo and the second one is less flattering. I do not believe the coin would garner a plus, if resubmitted.

 

Would you still grade it as a 66?

 

Looking at just the second image, I would have guessed MS65. But, that image appears to be far inferior to the first one.

[Mary B]

Slab picture is much better , now I see the MS-66