Standing Liberty Quarters - New Images

[Elbesaar]

I was asked by a few collectors to reduce the size

of my images - and I need to reset image size at

Photobucket.

 

I'll be working on the images this week when I have the time.

[Bill L]

Sweet coins

[BROADSTRUCK]

 

I think our 1918-S's are twins separated at birth right down to the wild die polish marks

 

My AU58FH reverse.

 

[Elbesaar]

 

[Buffalo Head]

WOW!! You have a very beautiful set here!! The images are also very well done. I love what I see here your collection is amazing!

[jerseycat10]

Do you still have the previous collection of 65's? Or did you get rid of that to start something else?

[johnny9434]

that sure is a nice job with the photography. great job by all

[Keigwin]

Nice quarters! Congrats.

 

And no one's better with the camera than John. Love the images.

Lance.

[dean1345]

Beautiful SLQ's and images!!!!!!!!!!!

[noow]

Great coins! Like the number of FH's

[physics-fan3.14]

What's with all the scratches on the 23-S?

[mhomei]

VERY IMPRESSIVE!!!

ME LIKE

[messydesk]

This is really a top notch set, and I really enjoyed playing with them at the ANA show. It's the kind of set that should inspire anyone to at least want to put a 3-coin type set together of this series.

[Elbesaar]

 

Here are some of the coins from the MS 65 collection

 

 

[Elbesaar]

.

[jom]

Love that holder look. Joe (Buffalohead) first came up with that along with another member here and I'm going to do the same. However, to be accurate I'm going to put the reverse side in reverse order just like it would look for real.

 

Mike: You really really REALLY need to make your photos a bit smaller.

 

 

jom

[mkman123]

not wanting to pick a fight but you don't like any NGC SLQs?

[Elbesaar]

I have had approximately 50% of my better set in NGC holders.

 

If the coin is right - the holder is secondary. If all that are presented

that meet my criteria are in PCGS - or - ICG - or - ANACS holders -

then so be it.

 

Remember - buy the coin and not the holder.

 

If I agree with the grade - then its not a problem.

I'm not going to buy a 64 in a 65 holder regardless

of whose holder it is.

 

.

 

 

[Elbesaar]

.

 

 

[mtnstyne]

I think I prefer the first set as it shows the toning better. I have no SLQs so take that as a consideration of my opinion.

[noow]

.

[comicdonna]

I would have liked to have seen the images of the coins.

[Old Pueblo]

What happened here???

 

Where's mike's post???

 

 

[jom]

Yeah, what happened?

 

jom

[comicdonna]

He made a post saying something like: "No comments? so be it". I came back 10 minutes later to look at the coins, and he had edited all of his posts.

[physics-fan3.14]

He made a post saying something like: "No comments? so be it". I came back 10 minutes later to look at the coins, and he had edited all of his posts.

 

So I'm supposed to comment on every post of his? I look, I like, and sometimes I comment. Surprised he hasn't deleted his Barber thread, I never comment on that one.

[mkman123]

maybe bad day?

[WoodenJefferson]

I look at just about every thread on US Coin & General Forums, I said look....there are so many of us that just look and don't say much...I like nice looking coins with nice pictures but deleting images is like grabbing your ball and going home.

[Chris1976]

I dont understand why he would delete everything after 4 days had passed since replies were being posted? 9/15 to 9/19

[ldhair]

From what I saw posted this is one hell of a set. All well matched original looking surfaces. Don't have a clue what went on here.