Guess the grade 1880 O Morgan (revealed!!)

[nk1nk]

 

Thanks, Nick

[zboyle04]

the lighting looks off, cannot tell about the luster. I also do not remember if 1880-o is known for a soft strike, if so, then MS62 or 63, if not then high AU, either AU55 or 58

[cpm9ball]

From the lighting (or lack of it) I can't tell, either. It has a nice "n" clash, but I can't tell if the designer's initial is above the "d" of IGWT.

 

May I suggest that in the future, you resize your photos to no more than 800x800. I can only view about two-thirds of each photo and have to scroll up and down. Besides, your enlargements tend to show more detracting marks than might be seen under the normal magnification a grader might use.

 

Chris

[Walkerfan]

Looks to be an AU 58 slider.

 

I base this on the lack of detail and hits on the reverse breast, which is likely a light rub/circulation.

[HiHoAudio]

MS62.

[mtnstyne]

MS63

[James_OldeTowne]

MS-61.

[SWNGC]

62

 

[nk1nk]

thanks for all the input, good job to those who were correct and thanks for the advise cpm9ball, I do believe your right the pictures really show the ditracting marks, more so than they are.

 

here is the results

 

 

Thanks, nick

[James_OldeTowne]

1880-O is certainly an underrated date in the series. Almost always, they are marked up.