1829 CBH

[harvey8542]

Alright I think I may have finally found one you will all like. Opions on grade value and overton if you please.

[murty]

Looks like an Extra-Fine 45

[bsshog40]

I agree harv. this looks about VF45 to me also. There is something that looks odd to me about the color tho'. Of course, I'm not the best with CBH's.

[rrantique]

:shy:AU-50, net xf-45?

[James_OldeTowne]

An excellent die marriage for type, and easily EF-40 or better.

[physics-fan3.14]

Looks like an EF-45 to me also. I like the obverse, but the reverse picture has some weird lighting or angle or something - either its trying to hide something or the picture taker just didn't do it right.

 

And who really cares what we think - it is all about whether you like it or not.

[harvey8542]

Looks like an EF-45 to me also. I like the obverse, but the reverse picture has some weird lighting or angle or something - either its trying to hide something or the picture taker just didn't do it right.

 

And who really cares what we think - it is all about whether you like it or not.

I believe I got a real good deal on this one. I traded a 1943 S MS-66 Quarter plus $125 for it.

[jtryka]

Looks to me like it's VF to XF, a very nice coin.

[WinstonWare]

XF details and a nice example. I am concerned about the color though.

[TomB]

It has a lot of meat, but it does not appear to have its original skin.

[Just Bob]

It looks like O-105, R1.

[Raybo55]

I'd say an easy XF and all I know is................I like it!

 

 

Ray

[Mozin]

XF details and a nice example. I am concerned about the color though.

I agree, there is something that does not look right.

[JKK]

AU-50. I have an 1829 that's got just a bit more mint luster and is AU-53, no problem. Nice-looking bustie.

[MikeKing]

very nice looking bustie. it's so hard to really assess without seeing it in hand, re: the surfaces. Somewhere along the line it was dipped and/or cleaned, and without actually looking at it, it's hard to tell how extensive that was.

[harvey8542]

Here are my pic's of the coin which I feel are alot more represenative of how the coin looks in hand. Opions now?

[MBA101]

If you are happy with it that is what counts. Nice details. Not as dirty or toned as I like but it does not look like a bad coin. I would sau AU-53 or 55 ish.

[WinstonWare]

The details are good but it has been stripped of its original surfaces…

[TomB]

It's had some work done on it.

[MBA101]

It's had some work done on it.

 

Its had a dip for sure, but hopefully not much more than that...

[SkyMan]

Pleasant coin, Harvey.