New Toneddollars Images- Part One- Caution dialuppers - Large images

[robec1347]

Jack sent me a box with 12 of his toned Morgans to image. Because several of them were toned on Proof Like surfaces, it was quite difficult if not impossible to capture the true image that the eye observes. If only the camera would take pictures in 3D instead of 2D.

 

These are all Non Battle Creek Morgans.

 

 

 

 

[ant]

i.m.o they are nice coins! but they look AT to me.

[Dwaine]

Very impressive coins and great pictures.

[robec1347]

i.m.o they are nice coins! but they look AT to me.

 

I don't know how they were toned. Maybe Jack or Sy could explain the process. All but 2 are PCGS certified.

[ant]

[harvey8542]

VERY VERY NICE

[MarkFeld]

i.m.o they are nice coins! but they look AT to me.

 

I don't know how they were toned. Maybe Jack or Sy could explain the process. All but 2 are PCGS certified.

Those coins are stunning looking and I have no question, whatsoever, regarding their originality.

[TomB]

If anyone thinks those coins look AT then they best learn a bit more about how Morgan dollars can be found. The coins are original.

[Dwaine]

Doesn't most of this type of toning come from the coins sitting in the Mint bags for so long? This is why the color's are so vibrant on one side and not both.

[MarkFeld]

Doesn't most of this type of toning come from the coins sitting in the Mint bags for so long? This is why the color's are so vibrant on one side and not both.

I think that is correct, though occasionally two sided toners can also be found in Mint bags.

[MikeInFL]

I think if someone sent me a group of coins like this to image, I would have a tough time returning them. Very, very nice.

[bsshog40]

Those Morgans have some awesome toning to them I think that these would get the * from NGC huh??

[rrantique]

That is some great looking coins Bob. (thumbs u

[SkyMan]

GREAT coins!!! These suckers are the real deal. These coins are definitely bag toned. I've had the great pleasure of seeing Jack's entire Morgan collection a couple of times and his coins are mind boggling. The '79-S is a definite WOWSER!

 

Excellent pics Bob, and in the other 3 posts too!

[saen78]

Very nice toners in all 4 posts and great pics Bob

[robec1347]

Thanks for all the compliments on the imaging. Believe me, the images are only a fraction of how good they looked in hand. They were incredible.

[bsshog40]

Thanks for all the compliments on the imaging. Believe me, the images are only a fraction of how good they looked in hand. They were incredible.

 

I can only imagine Bob, and thanks for clearing up the slab issues for me. I looked closer and started to think this was the issues I was seeing.

[WinstonWare]

Lovely coins (thumbs u

[Keigwin]

Stunning! Amazing, really.

 

So what's with the many fine, vertical "scratch" lines on the reverse of the '79S and '80S (also in Parts Two and Three of this thread). They don't look like slab scratches. They look like rubbing marks. I would have guessed it was from improper cleaning. No? I know they aren't all graded & slabbed. Are these?

[robec1347]

Stunning! Amazing, really.

 

So what's with the many fine, vertical "scratch" lines on the reverse of the '79S and '80S (also in Parts Two and Three of this thread). They don't look like slab scratches. They look like rubbing marks. I would have guessed it was from improper cleaning. No? I know they aren't all graded & slabbed. Are these?

 

10 of the 12 are PCGS slabbed, 1 is Anacs and 1 is IGC. The 1900 and the 1883-O were the non-PCGS coins.

[toneddollars]

Die polish lines for sure