• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

robec1347

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    5,033
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    23

Everything posted by robec1347

  1. That is not true. While PCGS does uses SP on SMS and Specimen coins, they don’t consider SMS coins as Specimen. The SP on SMS coins is for Special, as in Special Mint Set, not Specimen. In fact they describe Specimen coins as such: Specimen Term used to indicate special coins struck at the Mint from 1792-1816 that display many characteristics of the later Proof coinage. Prior to 1817, the minting equipment and technology was limited, so these coins do not have the “watery” surfaces of later Proofs nor the evenness of strike of the close collar Proofs. PCGS designates these coins SP. Nowhere in their description do they state SMS coins are Specimen strikes. Special Mint Set A set of special coins-neither business strikes nor Proofs-first struck in limited quantities in 1965 and officially released in 1966-1967- to replace Proof sets, which were discontinued as part of the U.S. Mint’s efforts to stop coin hoarding. The quality of many of the 1965 coins was not much better than that of business strikes-but by 1967, some Special Mint Set (SMS) coins resembled Proofs. In fact, the government admitted as much when it revealed how the 1967 issues were struck. In 1968, Proof coinage resume. There have been similar issues since; the 1994 and 1997 Matte-finish Jefferson nickels, for example, are frosted SMS-type coins. There also are a few known 1964 SMS coins, these likely struck as tests in late 1964 for the new 1965 SMS strikings. Do you see Specimen Strike on any of the SMS coins?
  2. No, those were well out of my range. This was from a Legend auction a couple of weeks ago.
  3. I was gifted this by a former CU and NGC forum member, Curly. It will of course never receive a good grade, but it’s a keeper for me until it’s passed on to a new custodian.
  4. My first thought were adjustment marks, though these are more than normally seen.
  5. Yes, the only ones I didn’t get that were being offered are any bulk handled or those that may have been made during his open houses.
  6. Someone else thought of an earring, especially with the way the die breaks look around the ear.
  7. A couple of new coppers. Following the Lincoln cent is a Braided large cent with a good sized strike through under the ear and a couple of die cracks on the reverse.
  8. I’m in the same boat as you. With the exception of my wife there are no heirs. I’ve been talking about some sort of dispersal for a couple of years, but it’s all talk and I keep adding to the disease. I’m at a loss where to start as well as how to start when I’m still in the gathering mode.
  9. I do like die polish. I was going through part of a roll of 1959 Lincoln’s I shared with another collector. Out of the 20 coin I had I found matching polish lines from 4 different dies. These are 3 of 4 coins from one of the dies. From another die pair