• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Yarm

Member
  • Posts

    719
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by Yarm

  1. This bis business sent me running to my online D&H.

     

    "Bis became a kind of cataloguing panacea for Dalton and Hamer. They used the term in several different circumstances, in each of which there is a relationship

    between a token already assigned a number and the discovery token. However, the connection between the two is stronger in some cases and weaker in others.

    For example, one can find “bis” tokens that could have any of the following features:

    1) Minor differences in one die or the other, i.e., a slight shift in a certain feature, or the addition or removal of a period [Middlesex 235 – 235 bis II]

    2) Share one die in common and have a different reverse or obverse (sometimes blank, as with uniface die trials) [Middlesex 289 bis and Warwickshire 43 bis]

    3) Share no dies in common but the design or concept is similar to a catalogued token [Middlesex 213 – 213 bis II; Middlesex 1052 bis]"

     

    I'm thinking Midd 583 bis falls into category 3.

  2. I noticed the Yorkshire 13d, Beverley pawn broker token in Marshall 2 as one that I had been offered before. There's some oddness here.

     

    Yorkshire 13d

     

    1) Notwithstanding Heritage's description below, the token was struck on a Foundling Fields halfpenny, probably Midd 305,

    with the lettering clear on both sides. I like my MS65's a bit "cleaner" and without an inked collector number.

     

    "Yorkshire. Beverley 1/2 Penny Token 1797 MS65 Brown NGC, DH-13d. E: \\\. Struck over an earlier anti-slavery type..."

     

    2) Jon Lusk's system for designating a Conder token as a Genuine Trade Token has swept in Yorkshire 13 (barely),

    this despite a disqualifying condition "Not made in bulk" if less than 480 halfpenny tokens were produced. I'll take the under.

     

    3) D&H includes several RRR edge varieties for Yorkshire 13 with the notation that "These were struck over other tokens and,

    in many cases show portions of the old inscription". So, a Yorkshire 13 token struck over a Foundling Fields token with milled edge

    becomes the RRR Yorkshire 13d with milled edge but a Yorkshire 13 token struck over a North Wales 12 stays Yorkshire 13

    because both had a plain edge.

     

    Only 308 more tokens to look through. ;)

     

    http://i110.photobucket.com/albums/n89/rwyarmch/Message%20board%2015/MergedYorkshire13vsNoWales122.jpg[/img]York 13 struck over North Wales 12

     

    yarm

     

     

     

  3. Compared to Conder tokens (which were saved in quantity), it's tougher to find uncirculated examples of the "industrial" British tokens of 1811-12

    as catalogued by Withers. Most were used in commerce and were not produced or imitated to cater to token collectors. Here's an example

    of a twopence (Withers-910) in decent condition from a recent Eric P. Newman sale.

     

    lf72.jpg

    lf82.jpg

  4. While researching this penny token by John Milton (Middlesex 24), I came across a 1903 article by S. Hamer in the British Numismatic Journal

    regarding the background and mintages of many of the private tokens within the Conder series. The first token in the article (Middlesex 309)

    is an example of a token with a reported mintage (24 in copper) that seems at odds with the number of auction appearances and availability

    of the token in dealer inventories. Perhaps there were follow-up orders after the original strikings.

     

    Hamer-Private tokens

     

     

     

    00924q002.jpg