- Popular Post
-
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
blinewalker
-
Posts
45 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
NGC Journals
Gallery
Events
Store
Downloads
Posts posted by blinewalker
-
-
-
EagleRJO, the 1919 Mercury dime wasn't discovered until the early 80's and wasn't published until 2015, so it doesnt seem out of the ordinary that a 46 year old coin would just be found
-
-
-
-
Curious about this VAM it's seems like some really good doubling on the profile, and tripling on the motto, to not be recognized. I'm just looking for some insight on how let's say a 1891-P VAM-02 is on the top 100 list and this isn't.
-
-
I've posted several times but thanks for the reminder, If I hadn't already identified the VAM I probably would have followed the "rules" set forth. I wasn't asking for which VAM just a simple why no love for it.
-
Ok so I have to ask why no love for the 1892-P VAM-5, compared to other VAMS I've looked at this one is far better than a double ear, low mintage, triple moto, doubling on the profile. Is it because this is a common VAM? I'm just trying to understand the thought process behind the listing
-
The E R T Y in liberty isn't doubled? They display splitting in the serifs on the uppers
-
-
-
Hello, looking for opinions on this one, when I first seen it I thought for sure post mint damage but the more I looked at it the more I've convinced myself that it may not be IDK. What do you guys think? The way the lines start and stop is what has me questioning it, the way the scratches don't cut through the whole design in some places is what I'm questioning. Thanks
-
Thank you sir and to answer your questions earlier I looked at all the usual suspects VV WEX, CHERRY, so if it turns out I'll let ya know
-
I sure will, I'll be sending it to Wexlers this week. Thank you
-
On 7/4/2022 at 3:08 PM, Coinbuf said:
OMG the glare and lighting, sorry couldn't help myself. The split serifs are interesting, and I want to say yes but I'm thinking it could be some die erosion effects. VV has no listing for any DDO for this date, have you tried posting this on the CONECA forum to get feedback there?
Lol got me on that one. I checked VV Wexlers, and anything else I could find. Coneca was my next stop.
-
On 7/3/2022 at 10:14 PM, Hoghead515 said:
It sure looks good to me. More qualified people will be on here soon to confirm it or deny it. But I really think it is one myself. But Ive been wrong before. Nice find if it is. Did you check anywhere else to see if theres any more found to compare it to?
Thanks for the reply
-
-
-
Thank you for the info on this Conder
-
I believe I answered my own question lol. The coin I have looks to have the reverse of a 1802 and not the 1800 so yep pretty positive its a fake.
-
-
Yes I realize Variety didn't look at the coin and say yep that's it, I guess a better way to say it would be, Variety Vista has this 1962 proof quarter that looks almost identical to mine, but with no die markers or descriptions available I'm assuming this.
-
http://varietyvista.com/09b WQ Vol 2/1962 Photos/1962PDDO007a I.jpg. According to Variety Vista it's the DDO-007
1950-D penny RPM
in Newbie Coin Collecting Questions
Posted
Welcome to the hobby that tells one to ask any question you'd like than almost beats you down for not knowing what it is you have. I'm not for sure if you've used Coppercoins.com or not but its an awesome place to look for anything doing with Lincoln Cents. its close to RPM-002, and 003 sort of depends on which picture you look at and what die stage the picture was taken. Good luck on your path of coin collecting and I'm glad to see your in it for the collecting and educating yourself and not just for making $$$$$$.