coinstudentdeadeye

Well it would also depend on the bulk of coins you bought, how would you know whats worthy to submit if you don't examine them. I bought 20 1923 peace dollars BU and i would only submit one thought to be in MS65 or higher maybe 64 on the other hand i bought 20 1971-1976 Eisenhower halves  40% silver proofs in beautiful condition and I wouldn’t submit any due to cost vs value. Hope that helps 

9 minutes ago, Hoghead515 said:

These guys are trying to help you and your acting like a jerk to them. I guarantee they know what they are talking about. They been in this hobby for years. And by your post your giving them a little bit of a tone because they are telling you it is impossible to be an RPM. if your the expert coin grader then why even ask here. 

Well to be honest with you i would have never asked if it wasn't because of getting the coin graded i just wanted some feedback im constantly learning and i never learn anything here but i said hell ill ask and to be honest i feel like the first answers i gave were not rude. It wasnt until other people stepped in and thought they were something to be afraid of. Anyway have a good day. All i need are professional graders and coins, the rest is all smoke and mirrors to me.  

13 minutes ago, Just Bob said:

I have not yet put forth an opinion in this thread. I have, however stated seven facts. (Nine, if you count these last two.) I would still like for you to explain to me how the above statement concerning doubled die obverses on Anthony dollars relates to a repunched mint mark on  a 2005 Roosevelt dime. I am not blind, as you suggest. I am more than willing to listen to your explanation.

In 96 the denver mint started using single squeeze hubbing process for cents quarters and in between, which eliminated alot of double dies. So then everyone starts using it year by year. Then 99 comes and the US mint needs to push out colllector proof sets and what do they do? They use the old equipment to dish it out. The results, a bunch on nice doubled dies on obverse proof sets. So my point is just because technology improved doesn't mean they cant be in a situation where they might have to use old machinery for whatever reason. And if thats a scenario then how do we know there cant be others. All im saying is i keep an open mind this isn’t about being right or wrong for me. Its about seeking my own results and yes that involves asking for opinions. That doesn't mean I have to take that opinion and run with it. What he said were facts and i never disagreed with him on the contrary i asked him a question to better my knowledge. I also stated my opinion while never saying I was right. I said im getting the coin graded so i can know for sure what may or may not have happened. That decision was made before even asking the question i just wanted some feedback. 
 

2 minutes ago, Morpheus1967 said:

what's next, your momma jokes?

Fixed it for you.  

“Momma” you corrected me with an informal word. 😂 don’t quit your day job. 

1 minute ago, Morpheus1967 said:

Looks like *you've yet to learn.  

 

Fixed it for you.  

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Applause you must feel so accomplished with your high school rhetoric whats next your mama jokes. 

1 minute ago, Morpheus1967 said:

I know  a new user who thinks he has the next rare find.  Get them all the time here.  It's what the ignore button is for.  

Looks like your yet to learn how to use it if your wasting your time on this thread. 

Just now, Morpheus1967 said:

Do you even realize who Mr. Lange is?  Take a look under his user name.  If that doesn't help, take a look at this link.  Scroll down a bit.  And then maybe re-think your attitude.

David Lange

Do you even read what i write or just see what you wanna see. 

2 minutes ago, bsshog40 said:

It's actually funny that you know soo much about coins but you are asking if your coin was an RPM. Hand punching mint marks ended in 1989. Your coin is a 2005 which was made with a die!

So your not ignoring just yet, make up your mind. 

6 minutes ago, JT2 said:

Well I would not call us volunteers.  We are collectors and hobiest for some of us quite a few years.  However mister Lange IS a Professional and this is his job to know these type things.  Thanks for asking and you are welcome for the very many years of expirence that a few of these memeber have givin you.

And just so you dont put words in my mouth i never went against Mr. Lange or said he was wrong. I asked him a question and then explained my route towards finding my answer. The reason for my question was for an opinion that and only that. It was you and whomever they are that came and wanted to stir up controversy. 

2 minutes ago, JT2 said:

Well I would not call us volunteers.  We are collectors and hobiest for some of us quite a few years.  However mister Lange IS a Professional and this is his job to know these type things.  Thanks for asking and you are welcome for the very many years of expirence that a few of these memeber have givin you.

Maybe they should work on being more open minded and not just think robotically and impose their opinions upon the ones who simply want different opinions which is the point and basis of a thread. As oppose to hearing one person and closing out every other possibility and stop thinking for yourself. No thank you. 

Just now, bsshog40 said:

Well another NEWBIE to put on my ignore list!! LMAO

Says the one who literally just came to the thread to be a comedian, not even at volunteering can you crack it. Please do so. 

1 minute ago, Just Bob said:

Please explain to me how this relates to the possibility of a coin minted in 2005 having a re-punched mint mark.

Well if you don’t see a correlation then it would be a waste of time trying to explain it. You cannot make the blind see. Nor do i try im not a volunteer. I had one question about a coin and this is the end result. If i was NGC i would really consider what to do about these type of atmospheres that really seem toxic. Its a shame you and your buddys think this forum is their personal playground to dictate opinions. Ill leave it at that. 

3 minutes ago, bsshog40 said:

It's soo funny that newbies come here to ask opinions, don't care to listen to the opinions and then preach to everyone about how they know more about coins than the people they are asking opinions from!!

Whats funny is that you think your opinion is more than it actually is it states your a volunteer not a professional grader. This forum might be a big part of your life than it could ever possibly be for me, so i understand your need to preserve your status here or for your buddies or whom ever. Thats the real joke here, volunteer 😂

5 minutes ago, coinstudentdeadeye said:

How bout you digress a bit. These are mint sets, so i asked him, even on mint sets? He did not reply so how could you even possibly know what im referring too when i say opinion, do you even have a clue if this coin existed before i posted it and you wanna tell me what to think about it. Stop playing with me man. 

1999 – The U.S. Mint used the old hubbing equipment to create the SBA dollar coins needed late in the year and for collector proof sets. A couple of nice doubled die obverses are known for the 1999-P proof SBA.

these are the type of things that play a factor we cannot just accept someone elses thruth we must seek our own even if you turn out to be wrong. So i sent it to get graded boo hoo. And just to let you know i do my research more than you could ever imagine. So please dont over state your thoughts on me please. 

2 minutes ago, Just Bob said:

Mr Lange's statement is not an opinion. It is a fact. It isn't a point of view. It is the result of actually learning about the coining process. Do some research into how dies are made, especially how the process was changed in 1990/91, and again in 1994, for circulation strikes - including mint set coins. If you read up on it, you will understand why your coin could not have a Re-Punched Mint mark. It could be a doubled die, but the pictures are too fuzzy to make that call.

How bout you digress a bit. These are mint sets, so i asked him, even on mint sets? He did not reply so how could you even possibly know what im referring too when i say opinion, do you even have a clue if this coin existed before i posted it and you wanna tell me what to think about it. Stop playing with me man. 

7 minutes ago, JT2 said:

You should listen to DW what you are probably seeing is die deterioration....

Thats why i hardly seek opinions in forums people always think your some rookie that should have to listen. I know enough to know everyone is just giving their own point of view on these mint errors, that is all . 

Just now, JT2 said:

You should listen to DW what you are probably seeing is die deterioration....

I am not saying he is wrong nor i am right im simply saying my coins resemble doubling around the mintmarks and i sent one to get graded by a professional to see what the results may be. I shouldn’t have to take opinion as fact. He could very well be right id just rather get it graded considering i have about 12 more. 

They all show mint mark on top of mintmark one way or another. Very underrated coin btw not too many people know about it. Oh and some of em are partly missing the 5 probably strike error, not blurry. 

1 hour ago, DWLange said:

There are no RPMs on United States coins after 1990, because the mintmarks have been included in the master dies for each mint since that time. Any doubling on the mintmark would be the result of a DDO, but the photos are too blurry to determine that.

Even for mint sets? I have about ten of these Dimes. They all show doubling on the mint, only this one shows that ghost D. Anyway i sent it to get graded we shall see. 

2 hours ago, B.C said:

It won't pass a DD as for rpm I can't tell from your photo need more of a straight on shot 

I was wondering if this could pass as both an RPM and a Double D. 
thanks. 

Found this today in my coin stockpile. Let me know what you guys think. 

Sometimes you find what is called a counter stamp when someone stamps something on after the mint, those can still be collectible depending on your taste. This looks to be engraved or scratched on.