-
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
-
Posts
327 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
NGC Journals
Gallery
Events
Store
Downloads
Posts posted by FlyingAl
-
-
-
I'm working on a research project, and it involves 1936-1942 Cameo Proofs specifically. Specifically, I'm looking to expand the images of these coins in a die catalog. My work on this has been in progress for some time, but I'm trying to get images of as many of these as possible.
Here's what I'm asking for - I need owners of these coins to send them to me for imaging. I will be prepared to offer my photographic services for free, and a little bonus for their efforts. I am prepared to offer images of the Cameo Proof and five other coins in addition to that coin for free. The images will be obverse and reverse and whatever other shots I take and edit. My standard image rules will apply, and I will of course need to use the images for my research. PCGS/NGC graded CAMs are preferred. If you have a near-CAM coin, feel free to reach out too.
The only caveat is this - the owner of the coin will pay shipping due to how costs vary based on the desires of each member. I will, however, offer a stipend in the form of images of three extra coins ($30 in trade). If this is not enough, please reach out and we can see what we can work out. My goal is to make this as beneficial to those who are willing to help as possible, but I realistically don't have the ability to shell out hundreds of dollars in shipping fees, so I need to use my services as a sort of trade.
Feel free to PM if you any questions. Lurkers can reach out to flyingalphoto@gmail.com if they'd like to inquire.
-
- Popular Post
1941 No AW Proof Walkers are generally represented in about a quarter of the graded population. It was an extremely common reverse die, and as such the coins are pretty low quality. They are generally discounted as such by specialists, but non-avid collectors of these may see them as novelty items.
Long term value on these is very weak. Coins with full details are much much rarer and desirable to specialists.
-
On 2/15/2024 at 7:53 AM, Just Bob said:
I see the answers to some of the questions have been changed. I will not belabor the points here, but will just wait for the finished article. Should be really interesting.
Yes. I don't want my replies here to affect how people will receive the finished article. None of the previous or now edited posts really put that in jeopardy, but these posts have much less context than the full article, and could be misinterpreted.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
On 2/12/2024 at 1:15 PM, Just Bob said:Hold on. Are you saying that the die pair was used to strike only a dozen or so examples (or how ever many were sent to the Smithsonian plus the ones allegedly belonging to the Eva Adams estate) and then retired? If that is the case, this story just got a lot more interesting. I am really looking forward to the results of your research.
This was not fully documented. The dies could have been used in service long after the Smithsonian coins were struck.
-
On 2/10/2024 at 6:16 PM, Sandon said:
Were the dies then used to strike coins for circulation, which could result in hundreds of thousands of regular pieces having the same die markers?
This was not confirmed, but it is possible, though unlikely.
-
On 2/10/2024 at 5:38 PM, Sandon said:
As it so happens, I had just posted a response to a member who purported to have a so-called 1964 "SMS" half dollar based on "die markers". See https://boards.ngccoin.com/topic/432733-1964-sms-kennedy-half-dollar. We have to deal with such claims with some frequency.
I hope that your research will resolve once and for all where these coins came from so that we can definitively answer the question whether it is possible that more of them may be found "in the wild". A definitive description of their characteristics would also be helpful.
The characteristics are all the same - struck once on a toggle press from fresh dies and handled individually. They will all share the same die markers, which doesn't stop those who have dreams of striking it rich from imagining the die markers on their coins.
- Sandon and Henri Charriere
- 1
- 1
-
On 2/10/2024 at 5:27 PM, J P M said:
Ok from my understanding the SMS coins were not even thought of until 1966. When the mint got tired of listening to the collectors complaining about no proofs being struck. And the only years were 1965,66 and 67 anything in 1964 would have been a Special Strike not a Special Mint Set. Is that a good start, FlyingAL
Even special strike would be a stretch. The name as it stands at "SMS" will probably never change, even though the coins bear no resemblance to such coins.
- Moxie15 and Henri Charriere
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
OP has tried this over at PCGS and got the same answer. This is not a so called "SMS" coin.
- Coinbuf, J P M and GoldFinger1969
- 3
-
-
-
On 1/16/2024 at 7:50 AM, Just Bob said:
You have a good eye, young man!
Congrats on your score in the grading contest, too.
Thank you!
-
On 1/15/2024 at 8:38 PM, Just Bob said:
What were the die markers that convinced you that yours was indeed a proof?
Surfaces, strike, rims, sheen, edges, VAM 1H.
For these, that's about as good as you can get.
-
-
-
-
There should be 10 images of two Peace dollars.
-
- Popular Post
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Thanks all for the comments!
-
Disagree.
However, I think the statement could be like this: "In order to maximize the potential value of your coin, you should get it professionally graded."
-
On 11/1/2023 at 6:03 PM, VKurtB said:
The lighting prevents me from seeing what I would want to in order to see a matte proof, but what I CAN SEE is some really nice inner rims that dive almost vertically down into the fields. I do think Flying Al might be drinking to excess if he thinks it’s a 58. There is no wear, only the typical slight weakness on the large O in ONE, which is because it is opposite the high point on Lincoln’s shoulder. For those with less experience, look at these O’s. This is the reason they’re less than sharp.
Kurt, there is a slight color change on the beard and cheekbone, highly indicative of wear. Again, angles will make this one appear far better than it is. Regardless, there is no chance at all it's a 68.
-
On 11/1/2023 at 4:52 PM, Mike Meenderink said:
This coin has NO circulation wear present at ALL.. the bow tie obv is as struck and the wheat stalks rev are perfect. Disagree with your assessment.
Excellent, please feel free to. I wonder if you hadn't gotten so lucky and won the coin, and then sent it in, and then received a grade of AU58, what you would have done?
Disagreed with the TPG?
-
This thread is ridiculous. I sure hope Kurt is joking.
The coin would likely grade out at AU58RB due to the wear on the obverse. The PCGS Price Guide does not list values for AU58s, as they are effecting worthless beyond a few dollars.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I went ahead and took the plunge at got the set graded - it was the best choice to preserve the coins themselves and their value, both monetary and historical. Here are the results, and I would post images but they're a pain to do here. You can visit my thread over at Collectors Universe if you wish to see them again. This is now, to my knowledge, the finest original set from the 1936-1942 era.
Half - PCGS PR68
Quarter - PCGS PR67+
Dime - PCGS PR67+
Nickel - PCGS PR67
Cent - PCGS PR66RD
- Artifiction, zadok, rrantique and 1 other
- 4
Comprehensive Research on the So Called 1964 "SMS" Coins Is In the Works - What Questions Do Members Here Have About these Coins?
in US, World, and Ancient Coins
Posted
Thanks guys!