• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

l.cutler

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    738

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by l.cutler

  1. l.cutler
    Nope, all those are large date.
  2. l.cutler
    OK, I guess the smaller picture in the album is just blurry. Either way, it is a zinc cent worth face value.
  3. l.cutler
    OK, the smaller picture is a bit blurry making it look like a large date, regardless. It is a zinc cent worth face value.
  4. l.cutler
    Which is exactly what I said in my first response, the first coin is a large date, the second is a small date zinc.
  5. l.cutler
    Slow down, you show at least 3 different coins, which are you talking about? In the album are a large date 1982 D and a 1983. The coin with the magnified picture is clearly a small date zinc.
  6. l.cutler
    Nice attitude, you'll last real long here. The small date coin you pictured is a zinc cent, not copper. The zinc bubbles are all over it.
  7. l.cutler
    Just one cent. The first coin is a zinc small date, it is only the copper 1982 D small date that is valuable.
  8. l.cutler
    The first coin in the album is a large date, the second is a small date zinc. Both are just worth face value.
  9. l.cutler
    That one is a large date as well.
  10. l.cutler
    That coin looks like it has been cleaned. Notice the shadowing around the lettering and devices, this is where the cleaning could not reach.
  11. l.cutler
    The circle is damage from a coin rolling machine. Where are you seeing the doubling?
  12. l.cutler
    They are just identifying it as a Memorial reverse, as opposed to a wheat reverse Lincoln cent.
  13. l.cutler
    Very clearly a close AM.
  14. l.cutler
    Highly unlikely. The only valuable one is the proof that was accidentally minted without an S mintmark. These only came in proof sets. There were millions of Philadelphia minted dimes without mintmarks made for circulation.
  15. l.cutler
    Sorry, but it is not real. It does look a little better than the usual replicas, the lettering is a bit clearer. Compare it to the genuine varieties though and you will see it just doesn't match up to any of them. Welcome to the forum though.
  16. l.cutler
    That coin is just badly worn, most likely intentionally.
  17. l.cutler
    Also think of the direction, what you see as an eagles head is facing the wrong direction from what a clash would. This is also a question for those more informed on clashes thatn I am, would a clash reach the recess of the die?
  18. l.cutler
    No not rare. It is, of course, a novelty type fake.
  19. l.cutler
    Yep, that is a dug coin.
  20. l.cutler
    It is your call and your money, so have it authenticated if you want. I personally would not as there is virtually no chance that they are silver. I would look for someone else to check them, or just forget about it.
  21. l.cutler
    Acetone won't hurt the coin. It may remove the foreign substance, depending on what it is though.
  22. l.cutler
    Looks like a normal nickel. Ice melting doesn't mean much, it could just mean the nickel was very warm when you did it. What other test did it pass?
  23. l.cutler
    Totally agree with the others, glue and plain old circulation.
  24. l.cutler
    If you are talking about the bump behind Washington's head, that is a bubble caused by high heat. Not a mint error, just damage. Just noticed, this is your first post. Welcome to the forum!
  25. l.cutler
    Even the blurry photos show it to be nowhere near 70. Quite a few small nicks.